Hack-Hook
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2012
- Messages
- 19,448
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
well by making that choice they have shown they are mature and practical.Wha..??,actually it was rouhani and zarifs choice to do this not mine.
What they should have done was had the arms embargo lifted as part of the nuclear deal but rouhani and zarif couldnt seem to care less about acquiring very badly needed new weapons,instead they seem more concerned with buying western airliners than badly needed modern fighters.
you knew why USSR fall , they tried to match USA and NATO airplane to airplane , bombs to bombs , missile to missile tanks to tanks and they had no means to sustain that.
why you think we need fighter jets more than Airliners , why you think we cant wait until we made our own design ? then whats the use of spending so much on developing technologies and infrastructure needed for a new fighter .
look at India with its Hal-Tejas it uses a single 54kn engine and didn't we announced soon we will have a 50kn engine why not use the money on that engine and project like Shafaq and Qaher ?
you must ask yourself we want to use those Su-30 against whom ? KSA? USA? UAE? Israel ? you think for example how long those SU-30 can stand against USA F-22 or Israel and Turkey F-35?
what about Silent eagle that KSA is gonna get ? you see we have no unlimited fund if we buy something its for the next 30 years at least and for that we need something with at least some minimum stealth feature .the stop gap argument is useless if we wanted to buy SU-30 we must have bought it 15 years ago not now .right now we need something to be detected 40km away not 200km away ,believe me you don't want to try and dodge AIM-120 before you even beware of the presence of the enemy fighters in area
Last edited: