First of all, required take off thrust depends on the ambient conditions.
That's correct.
And second, "reduced thrust take off" are not "standard procedures" to any airliners.
For all intents and purpose, they are. Unless your ambient conditions involve operating in monsoon or icing conditions on a daily basis which few airlines do
Ignorant?I'm guessing you know that already, so you should stop being ignorant and start explaining things to people more politely.
Pardon me for brevity but I did not want to bog down a lay person with technical terms and go into too much depth with regards to airbus flex thrust and Boeing's assumed temperature methods.
As for ignorance (contradiction on your part, perhaps you meant arrogance?) I recall it was me who first introduced you to the derate/assumed temperature procedures and explained the FAA certification criteria for Accelerate stop distances, in which case you should be cutting me some slack.
Lastly, I've just pulled up the computed take off performance figures for Pakistan International 777s over the past two weeks. In almost 100 take offs, less than 5% were performed at Maximum thrust. In addition to the SOP doc below, seems like a pretty standard operating procedure to me
This is what PIA SOP state: