Iran directly enters to the warr against Israel's genocide

This statement reflects a strong and uncompromising stance by the Islamic Republic of Iran against perceived aggressions, particularly referring to "Zionist terrorists," which typically points to Israel in the language used by Iranian officials. Such rhetoric underscores the heightened tensions between Iran and Israel, which have long been adversaries in the Middle East.

If this escalates into a conflict, it could have significant implications for regional stability, potentially drawing in multiple actors from across the region and beyond. The statement highlights Iran's willingness to retaliate forcefully, reinforcing its position as a central figure in the broader geopolitical struggles in the Middle East, particularly in relation to Israel and its allies.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1841742936859361726

 

[AbdulQadir7]

The Israeli cabinet has reportedly decided to launch another military strike against Iran following a recent drone attack that targeted Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's residence. This decision comes after a meeting of Israel's Security Cabinet, where officials discussed the escalating situation and the need for a robust response.

Key Details:​

• Drone Attack Context: The drone attack occurred on October 19, when a drone launched from Lebanon struck near Netanyahu's home, hitting a bedroom window. Fortunately, neither Netanyahu nor his family were present at the time.
• Cabinet Discussions: During the cabinet meeting, security officials indicated that Israel's previous responses did not include retaliation for this specific drone strike, suggesting that further military action is being considered. The cabinet is expected to make a decision soon regarding the nature and timing of the potential strike.
• Recent Military Operations: Prior to this discussion, Israel conducted airstrikes targeting Iranian military infrastructure, including missile production facilities and air defense systems. These strikes were characterized as retaliation for earlier missile attacks launched by Iran against Israeli territory.
• Escalating Tensions: The ongoing conflict has seen increased military operations from both sides, with fears that the situation could escalate into a broader regional conflict involving various militant groups supported by Iran, such as Hezbollah and Hamas.
• Iran's Response: Iranian officials have vowed to retaliate against Israeli strikes, stating that their response will correspond to the nature of the attacks. This has raised concerns about further military engagements in the region.

This development highlights the precarious security situation in the Middle East, where military actions by Israel and Iran are closely intertwined with broader geopolitical dynamics and ongoing conflicts involving various non-state actors.

 

[AbdulQadir7]

There are currently no verified reports confirming that Israel has launched a large-scale attack on Iran, despite claims made by General Amir Mokhtari regarding missile strikes and the purported success of Iranian defenses.

Key Points:​

• Recent Developments: On October 26, Israel did conduct airstrikes targeting military sites within Iran, described as retaliation for earlier Iranian missile attacks. These strikes were focused on missile production facilities and air defense systems, but reports indicate that they did not escalate to the level of a comprehensive military operation.
• Claims of Defense Success: General Mokhtari's statements about the effectiveness of Iranian defenses during these strikes lack corroboration from credible sources. While Iran acknowledged the attacks, it claimed that the damage was limited and that its air defense systems intercepted some missiles.
• Tensions Remain High: The ongoing rivalry between Israel and Iran continues to escalate, particularly following recent military actions and retaliatory statements from both sides. However, substantial military engagements would likely attract widespread media coverage and international attention, which has not been the case for this situation.
• Need for Verification: Given the tight control both countries maintain over information related to military actions, claims regarding large-scale attacks or significant military successes should be approached with caution until verified by reliable sources.

This context highlights the complexities of the Israel-Iran conflict, where information can be scarce and often politically charged, necessitating careful scrutiny of all claims made by either side.

 

[AbdulQadir7]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1851188625339191492

 

[HaiderAfan]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1851188625339191492

IRGC Deputy Coordinator Sardar Mohammad Reza Naqdihas stated that Iran will launch more deadly attacks on the "Zionist regime" in the coming days. This declaration reflects the heightened tensions between Iran and Israel, particularly following recent military confrontations and provocations.

Key Points:​

• Threat of Retaliation: Naqdi's comments indicate Iran's intent to escalate its military responses against Israel, which it views as a primary adversary. This rhetoric is consistent with Iran's longstanding position of opposing Israeli actions in the region, particularly those perceived as aggressive or threatening to Iranian interests.
• Context of Tensions: The statement comes amid ongoing hostilities, including missile strikes and air operations between both nations. Iran has been vocal about its commitment to retaliate against Israeli military actions, especially in light of recent attacks that have targeted Iranian assets and personnel.
• Historical Precedent: The IRGC has a history of engaging in proxy warfare and direct military actions against Israel, often through affiliated groups in Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza. Naqdi's remarks may signal an increase in such activities as Iran seeks to assert its influence and deterrence capabilities.
• International Reactions: The international community is closely monitoring these developments, as any significant military escalation could have broader implications for regional stability and security. Increased Iranian military activity may provoke further Israeli strikes or responses from allied nations.

This situation underscores the fragile security dynamics in the Middle East, where statements from military leaders can foreshadow significant military engagements and heighten tensions between rival states.

 

[Akbar26]

The Secretary General of the Arab Islamic Council declares: "I swear to you that the Israeli army will attack Iran's nuclear facilities - the decision has already been made"Iran must bolsters its air defences around the sites, and sought urgent help from Russia and China.

 

[sidkhan2]

In a significant escalation of rhetoric, Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khameneihas ordered the military to prepare for a retaliatory attack against Israel following recent Israeli airstrikes. This directive comes in the context of heightened tensions and ongoing military confrontations between Iran and Israel.

Key Developments:​

• Military Readiness: Khamenei's orders emphasize the need for Iran to demonstrate its military capabilities in response to perceived aggressions from Israel. He has called for a measured yet decisive reaction, ensuring that Iran's strength is recognized while maintaining credibility on the global stage.
• Operation True Promise-3: Iranian officials have indicated that plans for Operation True Promise-3 are underway, which aims to target Israeli interests in retaliation for recent attacks that resulted in casualties among Iranian forces. This operation is seen as a continuation of previous retaliatory actions taken by Iran.
• Context of Tensions: The situation escalated after Israeli airstrikes reportedly killed two Iranian soldiers and damaged military installations. These strikes were part of Israel's broader strategy to counter Iranian influence in the region and prevent attacks on its territory.
• Political Discourse: Within Iran, there is a growing call for a strong military response. Hardliners are advocating for immediate action, arguing that Israel's incursions into Iranian sovereignty must be met with force to restore deterrence and national pride.
• International Reactions: The potential for an Iranian retaliatory strike raises concerns about regional stability. Observers fear that such actions could lead to a broader conflict involving multiple actors, including Hezbollah and other Iranian-aligned groups in the region.

Implications​

Khamenei's orders signal a pivotal moment in Iran-Israel relations, with both sides bracing for possible military confrontations. The call for military readiness underscores the precarious balance of power in the Middle East and highlights the risks associated with escalating hostilities. As tensions continue to rise, diplomatic efforts will be crucial in preventing further escalation and ensuring regional stability.

 

[AbdulQadir7]

In a significant escalation of rhetoric, Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khameneihas ordered the military to prepare for a retaliatory attack against Israel following recent Israeli airstrikes. This directive comes in the context of heightened tensions and ongoing military confrontations between Iran and Israel.

Key Developments:​

• Military Readiness: Khamenei's orders emphasize the need for Iran to demonstrate its military capabilities in response to perceived aggressions from Israel. He has called for a measured yet decisive reaction, ensuring that Iran's strength is recognized while maintaining credibility on the global stage.
• Operation True Promise-3: Iranian officials have indicated that plans for Operation True Promise-3 are underway, which aims to target Israeli interests in retaliation for recent attacks that resulted in casualties among Iranian forces. This operation is seen as a continuation of previous retaliatory actions taken by Iran.
• Context of Tensions: The situation escalated after Israeli airstrikes reportedly killed two Iranian soldiers and damaged military installations. These strikes were part of Israel's broader strategy to counter Iranian influence in the region and prevent attacks on its territory.
• Political Discourse: Within Iran, there is a growing call for a strong military response. Hardliners are advocating for immediate action, arguing that Israel's incursions into Iranian sovereignty must be met with force to restore deterrence and national pride.
• International Reactions: The potential for an Iranian retaliatory strike raises concerns about regional stability. Observers fear that such actions could lead to a broader conflict involving multiple actors, including Hezbollah and other Iranian-aligned groups in the region.

Implications​

Khamenei's orders signal a pivotal moment in Iran-Israel relations, with both sides bracing for possible military confrontations. The call for military readiness underscores the precarious balance of power in the Middle East and highlights the risks associated with escalating hostilities. As tensions continue to rise, diplomatic efforts will be crucial in preventing further escalation and ensuring regional stability.

View attachment 1033603

https://twitter.com/x/status/1851224708907520495

 

[HaiderAfan]

Israel is set to enhance its missile defense capabilities with the introduction of a new laser interception system known as Iron Beam. This development comes as part of Israel's ongoing efforts to counter increasing threats from rockets, drones, and other aerial attacks, particularly amid the current conflict dynamics in the region.

Key Features of Iron Beam:​

• Cost-Effective Defense: Unlike traditional missile interceptors, which can cost tens of thousands of dollars per unit (around $100,000 for Iron Dome interceptors), Iron Beam operates at a fraction of that cost, with each interception costing approximately $2. This significant reduction in operational costs is expected to revolutionize air defense strategies.
• Operational Mechanism: Iron Beam utilizes high-energy lasers to disable incoming threats by heating them until they are rendered ineffective. This method allows for rapid engagement of multiple targets without the logistical challenges associated with missile resupply.
• Integration with Existing Systems: The Iron Beam system is designed to complement Israel's existing multi-layered air defense network, including the Iron Dome. It will provide an additional layer of protection against short-range threats, enhancing overall defensive capabilities against a variety of aerial attacks.
• Expected Deployment: The Israeli Ministry of Defense has indicated that Iron Beam is projected to become operational within the next year. A recent agreement worth approximately $500 million has been signed to accelerate its production and deployment.

Strategic Implications:​

• Enhanced Defense Against Multiple Threats: The introduction of Iron Beam is particularly timely given the ongoing hostilities involving Iranian proxies and other militant groups capable of launching rocket attacks against Israel. The laser system aims to provide a more efficient response to these threats.
• Shift in Military Strategy: The move towards laser-based defense systems reflects a broader trend in military technology where nations are increasingly looking for innovative solutions to counter asymmetric warfare tactics employed by adversaries.
• Long-Term Cost Savings: By reducing reliance on expensive missile interceptors, Israel aims to create a more sustainable defense posture that can adapt to evolving threats without incurring prohibitive costs.

Conclusion​

The development and upcoming deployment of the Iron Beam laser defense system represent a significant advancement in Israel's military capabilities. With its cost-effective approach and ability to integrate seamlessly into existing defense frameworks, Iron Beam is poised to play a crucial role in enhancing Israel's security amid ongoing regional tensions. As military technologies evolve, such innovations will likely shape future conflict dynamics and defense strategies globally.

 

[HaiderAfan]

BREAKING:
Iran's Defense Minister says Iran will respond to Israel, adding that even if Israel had fired a single bullet into a desert, it would not be tolerated.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1851562070564548652

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

Khamenei's orders emphasize the need for Iran to demonstrate its military capabilities in response to perceived aggressions from Israel. He has called for a measured yet decisive reaction, ensuring that Iran's strength is recognized while maintaining credibility on the global stage.

This is the main goal of Iran, establishing and maintaining regional and global stature. There is no negotiating point. Israel has no negotiating point either and does not care about ceasefire. That is worrisome because it can end in uncontrolled escalation. I guess Iran and Israel taking time to retaliate is a form of brake to uncontrolled escalation, however it has no effect on Israel's actions against Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria.

 

[Pakistan Space Agency]

One thing is for sure that the Iranian Air Force has proven to be incompetent and no match for the Zionist Air Force.

I don't think the Iranian Navy has much of a reach either and I heavily doubt it they're going to try and sail through the Suez Canal again as a show of force like Iran did previously.

That just leaves Iran's ballistic missiles and rockets arsenal as well as the proxy groups in Lebanon and Yemen.

Considering how heavily Iran is under sanctions and it's commitment to supply weapons to Syria, Russia, Lebanon and Yemen, isn't Iran overstretching?

No doubt Zion sees this opportunity to finally hit Iran directly and openly with great pleasure and they're likely to outlast Iran in a war of attrition.

Let's see if True Promise 3 is something that has a real and imposing psychological effect on Zion or just another showy promise.

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

One thing is for sure that the Iranian Air Force has proven to be incompetent and no match for the Zionist Air Force.

I don't think the Iranian Navy has much of a reach either and I heavily doubt it they're going to try and sail through the Suez Canal again as a show of force like Iran did previously.

That just leaves Iran's ballistic missiles and rockets arsenal as well as the proxy groups in Lebanon and Yemen.

Considering how heavily Iran is under sanctions and it's commitment to supply weapons to Syria, Russia, Lebanon and Yemen, isn't Iran overstretching?

No doubt Zion sees this opportunity to finally hit Iran directly and openly with great pleasure and they're likely to outlast Iran in a war of attrition.

Let's see if True Promise 3 is something that has a real and imposing psychological effect on Zion or just another showy promise.

Iran does not have much of an airforce. Iran navy sailed to Red Sea, not through Suez Canal, which needs Egyptian permit. Iranian missiles and drones are much cheaper than Israeli equipment and probably their radars too. I think Iran can last in a war of attrition with Israel, but not with US. That is why Israel wants US to attack Iran, which makes Saudi Arabia to pretend to be friendly with Iran. A serious attack on Iran, even by Israel, will have bad consequences for GCC and the world. Atleast during Covid, price of oil was cheap.

 

[Akbar26]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1851701228914553053

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

Iran's direct attacks against Israel has not deterred Israel from destroying and genociding Palestine and Lebanon, or seeking a ceasefire and negotiations.

 

[Akbar26]

Israel attacked Iran in three phases.The first phase involved a subphase destroying a radar site in Syria and suppressing ISR in Iraq, that worked. The next subphase involved launching a drone swarm and SEAD missiles at Tehran, from Jordanian airspace. That failed, everything was shot down -- 100% shoot down rate. The second phase repeated this attack, with greater saturation, it also failed, though a AD site (MIM23 Hawk) exploded for unknown reasons, likely malfunction, killing its operators.The third phase was an attack that came from Azerbaijan. This attack involved low-observability cruise missiles. This was the only attack phase that worked, but it seems their target identification failed -- all the buildings were already emptied.Overall, the attack was a complete failure. Iran didn't even use its best air or highest tier air-defense, but its coordination was perfect. At no time did Israeli fighter jets penetrate or even get NEAR Iranian airspace.Israelis are clownishly pretending they destroyed Iranian AD. If that were the case, there wouldn't just be 3 phases, but an infinite number of phases, they would be bombing Iran RIGHT NOW.