Iran "Dezfoul" missile revealed

[TheImmortal]

They should have some equipped with EMPs and electronic warfare weapons.

The longer the range of the EMP and other weapons, the better.

Most Western equipment is EMP proof, so you need more advanced types of electronic warfare.

This is how the future of weapons will be undefeatable lasers. Missiles will eventually prove to be useless, unless they are in a faraday cage and AI run.

Actually most western equipment is NOT EMP proof especially power station components. You could knockout the US eastern power grid and some components could take 6 months to 2 years to rebuild and install, effectively paralyzing your opponent economic operations.

Also how would Iran create an EMP based weapon without gamma rays? Which currently come from thermonuclear explosions.

Do you know of a way to create an electromagnetic field so powerful that it sends a burst of radiation that neutralizes nearby electronics without detonating a nuke?

I have heard of the threat of an EMP, but yet to see a how a military can create a large scale one without a nuclear detonation.

 

[Draco.IMF]

Dezful Reentry Vehicle

 

[Persian Gulf 1906]

Another missile for Yemeni houthi.
Iran being the Persian zorastrian empire is out to avenge the demise of their Persian empire by the hands of Arab Muslims Hence their hate for Arabs

this racist sectarianism post is tolerated on this website?

@Deino @AgNoStiC MuSliM @waz

 

[Sineva]

Dezful Reentry Vehicle

You can really see how they`ve redesigned the layout of the guidance section and warhead.It looks like they`ve increased the taper on the guidance section and elongated it,the fins have also been moved right to the back of the guidance section plus the warhead now appears to be fastened to it with bolts/screws.Effectively they`ve lengthened the nose.
Check it out compared to the zulfiqar

 

[SubWater]

Hello,
Today I was thinking about anti ship version of Dezful missile, so I draw below map.
It is clear with good number of Dezful anti ship version missiles we can push American navy far from our borders till gulf of Aden then American go out of different options to hit Iran main land. Their Tomahawks must fly around 2500 kilometer directly without any maneuvers to reach Tehran or other Iran big cities in North.
the drones and submarines search sea and send location of ships to missiles units, after that missiles units fire several missiles to all possible options and routs of ship to increase chance of direct hit.

Then I think what if Attack come from Mediterranean sea, so I draw another map and amazingly, iran can cover both Stria and Lebanon coasts with Dezful variant of anti ship. The Units in Lebanon or Syria coast can send positions to Iran and again missiles come from Iran to hit ships.

Also Dezful mobin variant and anti radiation and radar variants like Hormuz anti radar ballistic missiles are good solutions to increase chance of direct hit from 1000 km away in sea.

also I must mention that our western provinces are high in altitude in compare to Mediterranean sea, and that also probably increase range of missile deeper in sea.

 

[GWXP]

At that range anti-ship variant of Dezfoul if hardly possible because you will have problems finding and tracking the target.

For example Chinese DF-21 anti-ship missile is not just a missile----it is a system with satellites in space that try to find and identify US Navy vessels, over the horizon radars, AWACS airplanes, drones with searching ability, and all this information is gathered, analyzed and transfered to DF-21 missile which is fired at the target.

At the same time the target moves ---and all this search and track infrastructure provide the missile warhead with the information about the location of the vessel in real time

 

[skyshadow]

At that range anti-ship variant of Dezfoul if hardly possible because you will have problems finding and tracking the target.

For example Chinese DF-21 anti-ship missile is not just a missile----it is a system with satellites in space that try to find and identify US Navy vessels, over the horizon radars, AWACS airplanes, drones with searching ability, and all this information is gathered, analyzed and transfered to DF-21 missile which is fired at the target.

At the same time the target moves ---and all this search and track infrastructure provide the missile warhead with the information about the location of the vessel in real time

Iran already said it has 700 km anti-ship missile soo 1000 km is not that far we know Iran use satellite for guidance Iran have the over the horizon radar and drones too. im not sure about the AWACS

 

[Mithridates]

Iran already said it has 700 km anti-ship missile soo 1000 km is not that far we know Iran use satellite for guidance Iran have the over the horizon radar and drones too. im not sure about the AWACS

we need satellite for that otherwise the targeted ship could be anywhere when the missile reaches it's previous position

 

[skyshadow]

we need satellite for that otherwise the targeted ship could be anywhere when the missile reaches it's previous position

agreed 1000%

 

[TheImmortal]

DF-21 is also going to be optionally equipped with nuclear warhead. So even if it doesn’t directly strike the supercarrier it will wipe out the entire carrier strike group.

Can’t compare the DF-21 supercarrier killer to any of the PG missiles.

 

[Hack-Hook]

DF-21 is also going to be optionally equipped with nuclear warhead. So even if it doesn’t directly strike the supercarrier it will wipe out the entire carrier strike group.

Can’t compare the DF-21 supercarrier killer to any of the PG missiles.

Well don't you think if anybody want he can change 500kg warhead of Fatah family missiles with nuke?

 

[SubWater]

DF-21 is also going to be optionally equipped with nuclear warhead. So even if it doesn’t directly strike the supercarrier it will wipe out the entire carrier strike group.

Can’t compare the DF-21 supercarrier killer to any of the PG missiles.

always, there is smart solutions to solve problems.
you don't need to destroy enemy ships and kill many soldiers to win war.
Cancelling enemy missions is winning a war.
we are mature enough in the missile tech to do not follow others. we find and create our own solutions. also soon or later we'll have our sat in sky, so we can not stop our developments for that day to come.

I told firing several missiles to all possible direction of ships; for these anti ship missiles we just need to fire missiles to area that we guess ship is there. the final search and navigation is by missiles itself.

I didn't speak about warheads here, warheads can be nuclear or usual explosive but these two are not all options, we can have other warheads as well with these warheads we can polluted one big area of sea as result ship must go to our open channel to continue it's mission or cancel it's mission.

 

[Ich]

Maybe the ballistic carrier killer use a system like tercom. Wheras the topview of different carriers is in the database and an electro optic system scan the target area for this topviews. If there is a match, a calculater device calculates the new course lets say every 10 seconds and the incoming missile adapt this new course continously till impact. This wont be voodoo tech since a carrier isnt faster than 100 km/h.

 

[TheImmortal]

Maybe the ballistic carrier killer use a system like tercom. Wheras the topview of different carriers is in the database and an electro optic system scan the target area for this topviews. If there is a match, a calculater device calculates the new course lets say every 10 seconds and the incoming missile adapt this new course continously till impact. This wont be voodoo tech since a carrier isnt faster than 100 km/h.

Already done.

Early versions of PG missile used EO to look for heat of target vs cooler background of water and hone in on target.

There is even video of the seeker while in terminal phase on the web.

Then Iran created the Mobin version which Had a seeker that can be used on land targets.

 

[GWXP]

Maybe the ballistic carrier killer use a system like tercom. Wheras the topview of different carriers is in the database and an electro optic system scan the target area for this topviews. If there is a match, a calculater device calculates the new course lets say every 10 seconds and the incoming missile adapt this new course continously till impact. This wont be voodoo tech since a carrier isnt faster than 100 km/h.

Still SM-6 can take it out...so multiple missiles must be launched at the target

Persian Gulf missile is especially effective against Saudi oil tankers