What's new

Iran 'could halt' India oil supplies

On the contrary, India has been a strong diplomatic ally for Iran, even going so far as to defend it's right for development of Nuclear power. Recently under US pressure the ties had appeared strained but even now India looks to circumvent the US agenda of the economic blockade of Iran.
As far as selling to China goes, the only route Iran could use was the Asian Clearing Union (ACU) which even India was using. The US recently blocked that as well. India is looking for other ways to ensure that these ties are not broken. Only India, China and Russia can pull this kind of stunt off.

if indian central bank wants to do problem will be solved in a day
 
.
Half of Irans problems will be over if they stop sabre rattling and threatening the Israelis.....

Israel is not Irans problem and shares no border or a tangible issue that should invite the Iranians to go rabid at the thought of Israel.....

And to the poster defending the current Iraninan policy towards Israel because they dont deal with "murderers and people who occupy others lands"...
All major nations including China and Russia that have a closer reltionship with Iran have been involved in occupying lands and murdering people....(Muslims or otherwise)...why only Israel then?
 
. .
lossing a customer is better than transferring free oil, India needs an independent supplier too

It is trade that helps fuel your sanction laden economy and allows your people to thrive even though you are surrounded by enemies....

Its also trade that gives your leaders the guts to snarl at the US....

Why would you choose to amputate the only leg you stand on? Of course not taking into account pissing of your customer and traditional friend India?
 
.
Half of Irans problems will be over if they stop sabre rattling and threatening the Israelis.....

Israel is not Irans problem and shares no border or a tangible issue that should invite the Iranians to go rabid at the thought of Israel.....

And to the poster defending the current Iraninan policy towards Israel because they dont deal with "murderers and people who occupy others lands"...
All major nations including China and Russia that have a closer reltionship with Iran have been involved in occupying lands and murdering people....(Muslims or otherwise)...why only Israel then?

Simple. It's indigenous inhabitants have been mainly replaced from imports from other parts of the world. That makes it uniquely illegitimate in the eyes of some.
 
.
Simple. It's indigenous inhabitants have been mainly replaced from imports from other parts of the world. That makes it uniquely illegitimate in the eyes of some.

I can site Tibet as an example.....Why is love lost for tibetans?
 
. .
Tibetans have not been driven out of Tibet in the millions.


I think we both know the answer.....Its because Palestinians are Muslims while Tibetians are not....

The point Im trying to make here is.....Muslims should be muslims for themselves...NOT for other muslims...

If Iran minds its own business...half the battle is won...Why are they fighting someone else's battle?
It wasnt the Iranians that sold their land to the Jews....In fact Iran has no need to be part of this mess....simple!

The right thing to do is step away....
About the US....I agree with Irans stand....they have the right to pursue nuclear energy....But remove the rabid hatred for Israel...and the need for nukes or to be suspected of building nukes is lost right there....
 
.
First the NIOC shoots a letter threatening Indian companies of blocking the oil supply if arrears are not paid quickly.

Next, India shows its helplessness in facilitating the transactions, so now it is Iran's turn to do what it threatened of...

... instead the NIOC quickly changes the stance to say the oil will keep flowing without any problems.

Who's the prostitute here, who's the pimp, and where's the client? lol

Most importantly, where's the pride?

It is really funny to watch people bringing up the matter of pride in international affairs :lol:

LOL The world doesn't work like that
 
. .
Yes they have.....Dalai Lama and his exile govt are not vacationing in India sire!

Dalai Lama and his minions are not "millions". The Chinese have not systematically driven most of the Tibetan population out of their ancestral home to make way for ethnic han Chinese.

You have lost by trying to be clever so please stop making yourself look foolish.

There is no comparison of Israel with any other state in the modern world.
 
.
Dalai Lama and his minions are not "millions". The Chinese have not systematically driven most of the Tibetan population out of their ancestral home to make way for ethnic han Chinese.

You have lost by trying to be clever so please stop making yourself look foolish.

There is no comparison of Israel with any other state in the modern world.

A murder is a murder...an occupation of land and displacement of people does not change definitions based on the scale of the crime...

So stop trying to justify your hypocrisy Bengali....

Unlike some of you on this forum....I do not look at situations through the prism of religion....
 
.
A murder is a murder...an occupation of land and displacement of people does not change definitions based on the scale of the crime...

So stop trying to justify your hypocrisy Bengali....

Unlike some of you on this forum....I do not look at situations through the prism of religion....

You would have been doing better if you just not replied.

In what way is what China is doing in Tibet anything remotely comparable to what has befallen the Palestinians?

Please give me evidence of millions of Tibetans that have been thrown out of Tibet. You cannot as you tried to use Tibet as a comparison with Palestine and I picked that ridiculous analogy apart.

And, am I proud that Bangladesh does not recognise a state that was created by the wholesale ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. I would like to think that even if the Palestinians were Christians/Buddhists/Hindus etc that BD would still not recognise any state created in that part of the world, but you and I could never know the answer to that question of course.

Now I am done with trying to make you see sense so I bid you good day.
 
.
All major nations including China and Russia that have a closer reltionship with Iran have been involved in occupying lands and murdering people....(Muslims or otherwise)...why only Israel then?

It is INDIA that has been banned from the OIC, for occupying Kashmir, and murdering the Kashmiri people.

Such hypocrisy.
 
.
It is INDIA that has been banned from the OIC, for occupying Kashmir, and murdering the Kashmiri people.

Such hypocrisy.

Actually there are members that support India's bid to join the OIC. The only thing in the way is pakistan. India, which has the world's third largest Muslim population, has shown an interest in joining the OIC as an observer nation. While India's candidacy is supported by some OIC members including Saudi Arabia, pakistan's strong opposition and threat to boycott the OIC have led to India's inclusion into the OIC being blocked. The pakistan Foreign Office argued that India's inclusion in OIC would be against the rules of OIC, which state that an aspirant should not have an ongoing conflict with a member state
 
.
Back
Top Bottom