I doubt you really want to learn our perspective because you continue to repeat the same accusations like a recorded message, but here's our perspective:
1- Even if we assume that people who revolted in Syria were actually Syrian protestors (which is not true), we do not believe that every revolution should be respected. If today the Germans make a revolution and try to bring to power another person like Hitler, their neighbors will surely intervene and stop it. If today someone in Pakistan wants to raise to power that believes people of other faiths should be killed or sent to other countries, expect intervention from others. It's just a fact.
2- We do not know how many Syrians support the Assad regime inside the country. And we do not know how the Syrian Civil War has changed their views towards him. History proves that leaders in our region that were toppled were later admired and missed because the promises that had been given to their people turned out to be false and fake. Ghaddafi wasn't a popular leader, but as soon as he was killed, people realized how his presence had positively changed Libya and how his absence led to chaos, long-lasting destruction and foreign meddling. Saddam was possibly one of the most brutal dictators in the region, but Iraqis lived better under his rule as it was mentioned in this thread.
3- The Syrian Civil War was never peaceful, nor Syrian. Other Arab nationalities were involved in the protests from the first day and they were armed. It was a coordinated semi-coup. The point of the Syrian Civil War was to weaken Syria and change the balance of power in the region in favor of Israel (which was achieved thanks to the Arabs that have now befriended Israel), not to bring a democratic regime to Syria. The Syrian regime was and continues to be one of the most progressive and democratic systems in the Arab world, particularly compared to other Arab nations in the region.
4- I don't see you cry for the thousands of truly peaceful (and truly unarmed) Bahraini protestors that were crushed and tortured in Bahrain when Saudi Arabia intervened in there with tanks and armored vehicles. Sectarian much?
5- The best proof for what happened Syria, is the fest of terrorist groups during the war like Al-Qaeda and ISIS. We all witnessed how Saudi Arabia and Qatar exposed each other for supporting terrorism in Syria when their relations soured.
6- We believe that people who started the Syrian Civil War and caused all this mess and misery for the Syrians, solely for their regional interests, are to blame. Not the ones who tried to end it and bring order to the country again. We strongly and truly believe that we are on the right side of history in this war.
7- As for your other accusations, the Syrian Army did a fine and accurate job of fighting against terrorists and like any professional army, they focused their power and resources only on killing armed people, not civilians. Most civilians that were killed in the war were actually killed by the innocent Sunnis you try to support for sectarian reasons in hideous ways that sent the worst image of Muslims and Middle Easterners to the world. If by innocent Sunnis, you mean the people who wanted to establish an Islamic caliphate and preyed on minorities like Kurds, Armenians, Alawites and others, then we have very different views of innocence and war crimes.
8- I am an atheist/agnostic and I don't really care much for any of this sectarian stuff on either side. I am against the strong presence of Islam in the Middle Eastern culture.
And I am not really interested in discussing the matter, particularly on this thread which is off-topic, but I shared our perspective with you as you requested. You can discuss the matter in the Syrian Civil War thread in the Middle East section of the forums.
