Interceptor spot on, though without blast: DRDO

[he-man]

IF that is the case why are you even on a Pakistani Defence Forum?

Stop wasting ur and my time dude.
Introspect what pakistan has got.

I have no time to even critisize pakistanis

 

[OrionHunter]

I'm definitely not born in the dirt poor India that for sure, **** the rest of your mumbo jumbo on IR seeker not mean to explode a big load of dog cum, your missile interceptor fail to destroy the incoming missile and call it a partial success. Even the US missile interceptor can only successive kill off the missile 3 out of ten tried, I don't think your Indian engineering a world class scientist that can have a better odd to killed every missiles with their missiles interceptor trail test compare to the US DoD they been working on the missile interceptor for over 20 yrs.

Indian stroke their ego with a success of the function with the tracking device on their missiles interceptor if that actually even work, probably the system couldn't explode in midair because of curry was used in place of the explosive, who the **** ever know.

You're in the US but I couldn't understand a word you said! How'd they allow you in?

 

[Omega007]

I am sorry yaar.
Normally I counter properly but I am currently operating from a cellphone so its impossible to search properly.

But its a fact that even the green pine radar used in bmd is israeli.
I am not sure about the l-star of aew&c.

Once again am sorry,i just can't search and counter nowadays

Oh I see.And don't feel sorry brother.I say you sorry if I offended you,it was not my intention.
Okay,take a look at their A 50 AWACS - it's primary sensor is a mechanically steered antenna housed inside a rotodome.
On the other hand,DRDO has already developed the S band radar for the Emb 145 AEW&CS.

Besides,most of the Russian ground radars, although quite high powered are still based on PESA technology.
On the other hand,we are moving ahead with AESA radars both domestic (look at the Defexpo 2014 LRDE posters) and Israeli ones.Now I'm not implying that an AESA is better than PESA but still you can not deny the fact that an AESA radar will always have better growth potentials compared to mechanical or passive electronic radars.

And we no longer are using the original Green Pine which by now has become a dated design.The sensor network for exoatmospheric interception leg of our BMD system is based around the Sword Fish LRTR which is far more bigger and has greater power output.It's TRMMs has been totally indigenised by LRDE.Infact LRDE had patented its first working solid state GaAs TRMMs,both S band and L band way back in early 90s.

And coming to canisterisation,it's not that big a problem since L&T already produces a variety of canisters for different missiles like Brahmos,Nirbhay,Prahaar and K 15 Shaurya to name a few.

 

[newdelhinsa]

@Oscar Despite repeatedly explaining the details involved it seems that the thread will not remain clean. It is frankly a rather tiring thing, to have to educate each and every poster individually. Not that the thread requires clean up, yet.

You shouldn't have wasted time on these trolls. The partial success story in media is deliberate attempt to downplay the success and let these constipated Chinamen live in their own fools paradise where every thing Chinese do is great and rest a failure.

 

[Indus Falcon]

Introspect what pakistan has got.

Alhumdullilah what Pakistan has, you can never have!

 

[SrNair]

Sometimes I like DRDO .They will not claim a full success when there is some minor glitches in test.They will admit the truth Either success or failure.

 

[he-man]

Oh I see.And don't feel sorry brother.I say you sorry if I offended you,it was not my intention.
Okay,take a look at their A 50 AWACS - it's primary sensor is a mechanically steered antenna housed inside a rotodome.
On the other hand,DRDO has already developed the S band radar for the Emb 145 AEW&CS.

Besides,most of the Russian ground radars, although quite high powered are still based on PESA technology.
On the other hand,we are moving ahead with AESA radars both domestic (look at the Defexpo 2014 LRDE posters) and Israeli ones.Now I'm not implying that an AESA is better than PESA but still you can not deny the fact that an AESA radar will always have better growth potentials compared to mechanical or passive electronic radars.

And we no longer are using the original Green Pine which by now has become a dated design.The sensor network for exoatmospheric interception leg of our BMD system is based around the Sword Fish LRTR which is far more bigger and has greater power output.It's TRMMs has been totally indigenised by LRDE.Infact LRDE had patented its first working solid state GaAs TRMMs,both S band and L band way back in early 90s.

And coming to canisterisation,it's not that big a problem since L&T already produces a variety of canisters for different missiles like Brahmos,Nirbhay,Prahaar and K 15 Shaurya to name a few.

Its impossible to compare the two systems with details as the exact details of our abm are not known vs s-300 pmu 3 or s-400

I was reading about that and all the info points that s-400 is unparallaled in tracking aircrafts with kill ratio of 85 to 93 pc.

Cruise missiles-40 to 80 pc

But as its ceiling is just 30 km so its not ideal for abm role.


On radars,we are at least 10 years away from russian levels.
They can install an aesa today in their systems but they have no money for that.
We on the other hand haven't developed even a fighter jet pulse doppler radar.

On a-50 u need to look at newer variant that will have an aesa and it would be arguably be better than l-star as russian experience outstrips us by many times,its inevitable.

We need at least 10-15 years to arrive at their level and maybe even 5-10 years to china's level.

 

[proud_indian]

Alhumdullilah what Pakistan has, you can never have!

you are talking about this!

 

[gslv mk3]

Alhumdullilah what Pakistan has, you can never have!

What is that ?

 

[Indo-guy]

What is that ?

Begging bowl ...

 

[OrionHunter]

DRDO Zindabad!

Umair bhai! WTF is soooo funny that you're all over the floor laughing your *** off?

Alhumdullilah what Pakistan has, you can never have!

What is that ?

You didn't know? Hafiz Saeed and Co plus Dawood the dodo!

 

[proud_indian]

What is that ?

Begging bowl ...

kashkol

 

[Agent_47]

Well it's a moot point,ain't it??I mean the BMD itself is quite self-explanatory.BMDS or Ballistic Missile Defence System.So obviously it would need specialised heavier high speed interceptors with higher target interception altitudes.The radars also have to have a higher lookout/detection altitudes due to the very high apogee and extremely fast re-entry velocity of Ballistic Missile RVs.

And due to these reasons,a dedicated BMD won't do any good against inbound LACM which employs totally different flight trajectory and can use terrain hugging/masking flight profiles to fool the radars.So for setting up a Cruise Missile Defence system,one has to deploy more AWACS and low level surveillance radars along with totally different kinds of interceptors.For this purpose,one needs deploy quick reaction ESHORADS which have to be mounted on highly mobile platforms,missile rounds have to be smaller,lighter and has to be able to sustain a much greater lateral acceleration than a Ballistic Missile interceptor.

And farther more,for a CMDS to be effective,one has to deploy a very sensitive surveillance infrastructure on ground and deploying just radars won't cut it.One also has to deploy a series combined passive Radar and Laser fact fingerprinting devices like Divya Dristi or Vera E to be able to pick up returns from radar/laser altimeters used in LACMs for their TERCOM and terrain collision avoidance system.

 

[Butchcassidy]

This is what you have quoted in your first post here:

You can read English sentences, but cannot understand the import of said sentences. I'm wondering if that makes you a failure or partial success.

That last paragraph, sir, was a beauty. Still cant stop laughing