What's new

Indus valley is tamil Civilization

dafuq are you on about? First you talk about fingerprinting, then about saliva swab. And what would that prove unless we have DNA extracted from IVC skeletons to see what they were like
Finally the answer from the Specialized Scientist has been received, which I am pasting as under:toast_sign:

"Different companies use different methods... some use the Y-chromosome, which will only trace back the male side of the family tree, while others use mitochondrial DNA, which is maternally inherited and so traces the female side (mitochondrial DNA is also what was originally used to determine the "Out of Africa" hypothesis,
(i.e. that humans originated from Africa).

DNA fingerprinting is more for forensics... like, to establish relationships between existing family members, such as paternity tests, etc"

https://shop.nationalgeographic.com/product/genographic-2.0-kits/geno-2.0-next-generation-genographic-dna-ancestry-kit--international-delivery

I can get mine done ,but because I don't have a Y-chromosome it won't reveal much about my ancient paternal history
Actually, maybe I can have a kit sent to BD for you through someone traveling there this summer. In that case you would have to mail the samples (saliva/ cheek swab) from BD to the US.
 
. .
Tamil civilisation formed the basis for Indian civilisation. Tamils culture spread all over India according to S.A. Taylor and other researchers. Tamils from the south migrated north when Kumari Kandam that is the southern tip of India was eroded by the sea.


These people settled around the banks of the Sindu river and over the years were responsible for the creation of Indus Valley civilisation according to Hendry Heras, a christian priest, who did research about that era. The Indus Valley is one of the world’s earliest urban civilizations, along with its contemporaries, Mesopotamia and Ancient Egypt. Among the settlements were the major urban centres of Harappa, Mohenjo-daro (UNESCO World Heritage Site), Ganweriwala, Dholavira, and Rakhigarhi.
and so is egyption and the atlantis 1 ;)
human race started from north africa/palestine fertile crescent.............. fact
and if u look in globe indus valley is much closer to it then tamil nadu so most logically people from indus civilization moved towards tamil nadu and colonized it or now new indian rearch would also point out that humanity evolved in tamil nadu :)
btw did that priest on whose reseach this ground breaking historic fact is based also found arc of covinent or immortal cup/golden chalis ???????????????? :)
 
.
This maybe not true.
They build part of Indian culture. The aryan people build the biggest part and it becomes the main stream.
Both this post and the one it sought to answer are terribly flawed.

Aryan, and Dravidian (NOT Tamil, or Thamizh), are language groups, not ethnic groups (unless you are a disciple of the triple distilled idiot, Tarun Vijay).

The same ethnic group might speak several languages, depending on the context; the Mughals, and other Turkish families, spoke Turkish within their families and among each other. They used Persian, an Indo-Aryan language, when dealing with administrative matters, Urdu (also Indo-Aryan) with the common folk.

The discussion earlier was truly excruciating.
 
.
Both this post and the one it sought to answer are terribly flawed.

Aryan, and Dravidian (NOT Tamil, or Thamizh), are language groups, not ethnic groups (unless you are a disciple of the triple distilled idiot, Tarun Vijay).

The same ethnic group might speak several languages, depending on the context; the Mughals, and other Turkish families, spoke Turkish within their families and among each other. They used Persian, an Indo-Aryan language, when dealing with administrative matters, Urdu (also Indo- with the common folk.

Aryan)

So what's your theory on the IVC chief?
 
. .
That could mean several different things.

Are you asking how the culture came to its evolved state? The state where popular imagination has placed it?

Are you asking what language tho7. people

I'm asking who you think they were.

What happened to them.

Did they survive.

Where did they go.
 
. . . .
Both this post and the one it sought to answer are terribly flawed.

Aryan, and Dravidian (NOT Tamil, or Thamizh), are language groups, not ethnic groups (unless you are a disciple of the triple distilled idiot, Tarun Vijay).

The same ethnic group might speak several languages, depending on the context; the Mughals, and other Turkish families, spoke Turkish within their families and among each other. They used Persian, an Indo-Aryan language, when dealing with administrative matters, Urdu (also Indo-Aryan) with the common folk.

The discussion earlier was truly excruciating.


It seems you didn't understand the question.

You could tell from skin color that there are different human races in India.
Tamil lives on the south, which shows that they were driven to that area.
 
.
It seems you didn't understand the question.

You could tell from skin color that there are different human races in India.
Tamil lives on the south, which shows that they were driven to that area.
Skin colour does not define race.

That a contiguous group of people living in the South of India speak Tamil does not mean they were driven there from anywhere else.
 
. .
It seems you didn't understand the question.

You could tell from skin color that there are different human races in India.
Tamil lives on the south, which shows that they were driven to that area.

I did not understand the logic.

I might have if you found a pocket of similar looking people geographically separated somewhere else, with some link traits or linguistics or ancient theology.
 
.
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom