Indus Valley Civilization, bronze age info thread

[W.11]

Your indian goddess figurine has much bigger waist, much bigger than indus one. Jewelry is different than indus one. its completely different. Jewelery wise, people have eyes, let them decide. Indus has jewelry very similar to Iraqi one. other than you everyone can see which jewelry is similar to which one. Only indian can't see that. whole world has pearl like or wooden pearl based jewelry. You raised no points at all. There is nothing to answer except answering your delusions.

im an indian, a hardliner one, im a ghaddar.

i think that nationalists would ever doubt my intentions, but what about Dr Mark Kenoyer an imminent archaeologist who points to hindu, buddhist, jain features in IVC arts or the other way around?

@56:50

the thing with nationalists is they are simply in denial, if you think that IVC is so similar to mesopotamia, why is it labelled as a diff civilization compared to mesopotamia, why the minoans on the other hand are not recognised as a separate entity despite being in europe rather than asia?

regards

 

[baajey]

I don't have time now, nor this dicussion is worth our time. But there is a conflict of opinion whether proto-iranian was the common origin of Avestan and Sanskrit.

Or whether, the earlier forms of avestan language itself morphed into Sanskrit after religious differences arose between dividing groups of priests. that is when they started to change the terms say for God to devil and devil to God in opposition to each other, among other things and slowly languages diverged.

History is not that linear. Even later exchanges between sanskrit and avestan influenced each other.

whatever was the past, does not matter. You are welcome to believe. For me these details matter less in this post.

I just had it with this sometime hindu attacking, sometime Pakistan attacking w.11. I was just sick of this person's cherry picked details in an attempts misguide others.

Most of what I said, I probably did not even mean it. I just felt overwhelmed by this person and his use of little little details to make up big things and draw strange unrelated big conclusions.

So I just kept on typing, without thinking much at all.

dont worry, i am used to it.
u r right when u said the earlier forms of language can be "defined" from a perspective of a single or multiple sources. they are all subject to theories put forward by some learned specialists.