W.11
BANNED

- Joined
- Jan 20, 2011
- Messages
- 15,031
- Reaction score
- -32
- Country
- Location
The more recent scholars such as JM Kenoyer has tried refuting the notion that the Indus valley civilization died, and rather went through a phase of localization.
Even though earlier, the scholars argued a lot about the death of the Indus Valley civilization, recent archaeological discoveries ar severely challenging this theory.
lack of Urbanization is given as one reason for the death of IVC, but sites such as Dwarka, daimabad, even Bara culture are sited as the sites who remained urbanized in the region, the bronze age collapse is used as a justification for the death of indus civilization which not only affected the Indus plain but also mesopotamia, this bronze age collapse reorganized the societies in a new manner, but on one hand the mesoptamia persists but indus valley civilization vanishes.
The periodization of IVC claims that the mature phase was not the same as early harappan phase, during which many sites which had developed early vanished and new sites emerged in the indus valley.
Early Harappan phase
Mature Harappan phase
localized phase
Some scholars such as JM Kenoyer have elaborated on parallel traditions along with the Indus valley civilization
What seems troubling here is, we see expansion of settlements through out south asian region instead of shrinkage
shortly afterwards, i-e 1300 or erhaps overlapping the late harappan phase is the Nothern Black polished ware phase
the recent archaeological discoveries have pushed back the second urban phase which is estimated based on NBPW period t 13th or 14th century BC
Tamil Nadu has revealed what seem to be harappan writing in one of the artifacts
this questions the very basic understanding of Indus valley civilization and its death
Hereis another piece i found which may provide answers to the what happened to the IVC during localization era, the evidence surprisingly comes from tamil nadu
chola coin (four spoked wheel ideogram)
IVC seal which same four spoked wheel ideogram
Pandya coin with a fish symbol reverse
indus seal with the identical ideogram/character
regards
Even though earlier, the scholars argued a lot about the death of the Indus Valley civilization, recent archaeological discoveries ar severely challenging this theory.
lack of Urbanization is given as one reason for the death of IVC, but sites such as Dwarka, daimabad, even Bara culture are sited as the sites who remained urbanized in the region, the bronze age collapse is used as a justification for the death of indus civilization which not only affected the Indus plain but also mesopotamia, this bronze age collapse reorganized the societies in a new manner, but on one hand the mesoptamia persists but indus valley civilization vanishes.
The periodization of IVC claims that the mature phase was not the same as early harappan phase, during which many sites which had developed early vanished and new sites emerged in the indus valley.
Early Harappan phase

Mature Harappan phase

localized phase

Some scholars such as JM Kenoyer have elaborated on parallel traditions along with the Indus valley civilization
What seems troubling here is, we see expansion of settlements through out south asian region instead of shrinkage
shortly afterwards, i-e 1300 or erhaps overlapping the late harappan phase is the Nothern Black polished ware phase

the recent archaeological discoveries have pushed back the second urban phase which is estimated based on NBPW period t 13th or 14th century BC
Tamil Nadu has revealed what seem to be harappan writing in one of the artifacts
this questions the very basic understanding of Indus valley civilization and its death
Hereis another piece i found which may provide answers to the what happened to the IVC during localization era, the evidence surprisingly comes from tamil nadu
chola coin (four spoked wheel ideogram)
IVC seal which same four spoked wheel ideogram
Pandya coin with a fish symbol reverse
indus seal with the identical ideogram/character
regards