What's new

Indradhanush 2015

ck.



Albeit, 1971 war is the only escape for you people but You will find we are discussing the air war scenarios.

61142_374334949312616_1147296092_n.jpg


i will admit that PAF had some edge in 1971 , but you have admit that you didnt gained anything in the wars against us and lost so many things were you had.:agree::D

:dance3:
16408.jpg
:lol::lol::lol:
 

Uptill now All RAF Challenge is Based on this Line"The RAF were "introducing them to the airspace",:lol::lol: And beaten Down 12-0 in the Process

No Wonder they are Pissed.And Brilliant Excuse

Another Source Another Excuse This time :lol::lol:Although Genuine Source

The RAF source also stressed that the Typhoons had effectively been fighting “with one arm behind their backs” as they did not make full use of their more advanced weapons systems.(Well then, that's why We call it a Training Exercise In First Place:rofl::rofl: ) So that's why they Lost 12-0 Real Excuse

Indian Air Force 'beats RAF 12-0 in training exercise' – using Russian-designed jets - Home News - UK - The Independent

Its Looks Like Funny now :D:Dthey sounding Like Usaf During Cope-india
 
Sources in the RAF are calling Indian claims of superiority in the air "comical" while ridiculing reports that the Indian pilots flying Sukhoi Su-30 MKI fighter aircraft defeated the RAF Typhoon aircraft not only in one-on-one combat, but also when pitted against two Typhoons.


A RAF source told The Independent that the claims cited in Indian media were clearly designed for the "domestic audience".

Meanwhile a spokesperson for the RAF said: "Our analysis does not match what has been reported, RAF pilots and the Typhoon performed well throughout the exercise with and against the Indian Air Force. Both [forces] learnt a great deal from the exercise and the RAF look forward to the next opportunity to train alongside the IAF."

Tony Osborne, the London bureau chief of Aviation Week, suggested the scores be viewed through the haze of pilot bravado and national pride, but acknowledged the Su-30MKI in the right hands "would present a potent challenge".
 
Well Even Kids Know this Simple Fact that Real War Scenarios are different
Facinating Fact is , When the RAF Chief, no less said in 2011, "Well they lost"...its the truth and holy grail..And Chest-thump. but when IAF says the same in 2015, it is lies, bravado, cricket scores etc etc..

Its Show How Insecure & Dubious Actually British Are

You have a lot to learn.
 
A RAF source told The Independent that the claims cited in Indian media were clearly designed for the "domestic audience".
Busted Again First they tell that NDTV Reports are comical And Designed For domestic Audience

In Next Line they Say "Even the Indian pilot admitted the SU-30s were “less successful” in the longer-range combat exercises "
Quoting Same Article As a Gospel Truth Changing there Statements


After that this Excuse

Uptill now All RAF Challenge is Based on this Line"The RAF were "introducing them to the airspace",:lol::lol: And beaten Down 12-0 in the Process

Another Source Another Excuse This time :lol::lol:Although Genuine Source


The RAF source also stressed that the Typhoons had effectively been fighting “with one arm behind their backs” as they did not make full use of their more advanced weapons systems.(Well then that's why We call it a Training Exercise In First Place:rofl::rofl: ) So that's why they Lost 12-0 Second Excuse

Indian Air Force 'beats RAF 12-0 in training exercise' – using Russian-designed jets - Home News - UK - The Independent

Its Looks Like Funny now :D:Dthey sounding Like Usaf During Cope-india

PS: In Both the Article The RAF Pilots Won't Dare to Contradict IAF Claims Accept Making Excuses Posted Above

You have a lot to learn.
So did You Waiting For you on Other Technical Threads Lets See you How Much You Technically Contribute than Trolling threads
 
So did You Waiting For you on Other Technical Threads Lets See you How Much You Technically Contribute than Trolling threads

The only troll here is you. If you cannot type in a proper manner then it is better you don't type at all. Posting in super bold letters does not mask your genetic stupidity.

Did any IAF officer claim victory or was it the media?

What was the engagement, BVR or WVR?

Were AWACs used?

What weapons were employed?

What were the restrictions enforced? Because a dumb troll like you would not know that such exercises are not conducted like in a real war.

Do you know anything of the above or are you here just to run your mouth like a silly troll?
 
tum karo toh chamtkaar, saala hum kare toh balatkaar????:o:
we have been saving British asses since ages.......now that we have turned the table upside down and replaced them with 4 most powerful country....they feel heart broken.....:eek:, but sorry queen u are to old now:sarcastic:

there is an old saying in urdu ,,..... JO MUKKA LARAI HAAR JANNE KE BAAD YAAD AYE USSE APNE HI MU PER MARNA CHAHIYE :sarcastic:
guru bhai chaa gye aap toh!!!!!:yahoo:
 
What was the engagement, BVR or WVR?
Typical Amateur Comment I Suspected From You Typical from Posters Like you who Jump into the battle Without Knowing Full Facts of the Issue

here is the Full Interview
Indian Air Force Sukhois Dominate UK Fighter Jets in Combat Exercises

After reading Full Facts on the Detail Interview Conducted of IAF Air Marshall & Aircrew By Vishnu Som Who there At Indradhanush exercises.
Then Return To debate Further on this thread
 
It's beyond pathetic when people start posting as if they are professionals in their field. Take the above highlighted part for example, even if that was true, do you realise what you are pointing out. PAF was able to fly all the way into India and give you a bloody nose on your home ground, on the contrary, recall how the Indian striking force was decimated when they tried to attack PAF bases on 7th September, now commemorated as Air-force day.
1971, IAF did well in the Eastern sector simply because of overwhelming numerical superiority of 10:1.... a single PAF squadron of F-86s facing ten IAF units of MiG-21s, SU-7s, Gnat and Hunters. ... where's pride in that.
In the West it was a different story, by IAF's own admission, most of air battles took place over Indian territory, which alone explains how PAF again took war to your country.
During Kargil hostilities, all the fighting remained on the Indian side, where the IAF conducted it's missions, as soon as Indian aircraft ventured on the Pakistani side, they became toast.
You should also focus on the more recent history, commonly known as the 2002 stand off and aftermath of Mumbai attack, both time the mighty IAF lost appetite for battle and was forced to stand down.

2008 air alert
After the 2008 Mumbai attacks, PAF was put on high alert. It deployed to all its wartime locations and started combat air patrols. The speed and intensity of the deployment and PAF's readiness took the Indian Army High Command by surprise and later reports suggest was the main factor in the Indian decision of not going for cross border raids inside Pakistan.[44][45]PAF was issued a Standing Order to launch an immediate counter-attack in case of an air attack from India, after a call from the Indian Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee to the Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari
In 2008,not PAF ur nuclear weapons stoped the chance for full scale war.I fear in future 26/11 type attack also will not ignite a war due to this nuclear factor.

The Falnkers of IAF were forbidden to use Radars in earlier excersies, according to sources.

Jara guartalab is par bhi farmaiye.

@Capt.Popeye @sancho @XiNiX



PAF has no heavy AWACs, No Jet Fuel Tankers, No Long Range fighters and its macth for IAF?

Plus we have P 8Is and Tu 142.
In maritime air patrol scenario we have clear cut advantage.
But in AWACS scenario they were in a commendable position whan compared to IAF,there AWACS may not be as powerful and capable as ours but they have numerical superiority( remember they have far less area to patrol,yet having large number of AWACS compared to IAF which currently having only 3 in inventory).also they are operating 4 IL78 tankers.pretty good number when compared to the total size if PAF.
 
In an interview with Indian television, group Captain Ashu Srivastav praised his pilots as exceptional but refused to quantify the results.

Again A stupid Reaction Bother to Read Full Interview before Posting Half quote Lines
The TalK is here about In subsequent
Large Force Exercises (LFE) which featured combined Eurofighter Typhoon and Su-30 formations, the IAF jets were somewhat less successful but consistently held an edge over the Typhoon.

Asked about the performance of IAF pilots in these Large Force Engagements, Group Captain Srivastav told NDTV his pilots performed "fairly well" though "quantifying [the results] is difficult".

NDTV Article Clearly States Only Insecure Blind Pakistanis Posters Who don't See It

In some of the most intense international air combat exercises ever featuring the Indian Air Force, IAF pilots flying
Sukhoi Su-30 MKI fighters had a resounding 12-0 scoreline in their favour against Royal Air Force Typhoon jets in Within Visual Range (WVR) dogfighting operations.


Desperation and Hate to Show IAF wrong of Some Fanboys Forcing them to Avoid Basic Analytical Facts :disagree::disagree::disagree:
 
Back
Top Bottom