Capt.Popeye
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2010
- Messages
- 11,937
- Reaction score
- 12
You are realy dumb aren't you. No one here is is claiming simulated training missions are indicators of any superiority of platforms or tactics in a pre-defined engagment scenario.
The question is where is your reference for the engagement results you presented. you have not given a single credible source to backup your claim...
So it is quite safe to say that you being as false flag pakistani, just butt hurt about the results of the training exercises and making up these claims...
please prove it otherwise....and most likely you will run out of mental space and comeback with your ridiculous vedic rants.
@MilSpec; you seem to be indulging in a waste of breath (and bandwidth too), I came upon @Orangzaib quite early on in this forum.... in a discussion on the Pak-FA/FGFA/T-50 wherein he claimed that he (and some colleague) of his could assess weld quality visually at a hundred paces and guff like that.
I had occasion to discuss that sort of claim with erstwhile colleagues in LRQA and ABS Inspection Services, we had a belly-laugh.... though one said that he was gonna "head-hunt" such talents for his outfit. Just leave Orangzaib alone, he makes more sense; when he stands up for "the Stuffed Lion of Raiwand" against "the Starched Khakis of Pindi" on other threads on PDF.
Now in all the verbiage that has been turned out on this topic here; Vijainder Thakur seemed to have made the most sense when he explained the nuances that should be read into such Exercises and what they entail; along-side some factual information. All said and done, the Exercises are just that..... a kind of jousting, shadow-boxing and ballet dancing in the skies. Hardly warfare as we would like it to be.