anas_nurhafidz
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2014
- Messages
- 1,382
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Identify that missile if u can
Credit in pic
Credit in pic
Indonesia Defence Forum
- Thread starter nufix
- Start date
kaka404
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2015
- Messages
- 177
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
anas_nurhafidz
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2014
- Messages
- 1,382
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
@penkostrad
pr1v4t33r
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2014
- Messages
- 5,042
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
Hawk 209 TT-0214 back on duty after major servicing
Komandan Depohar 30 Kolonel Tek M. Yani Rudiansyah menyerahkan pesawat Hawk 200 TT-0214 usai menjalani perawatan Major Servicing 2.000 jam terbang kepada Letkol Pnb Adhi Safarul Akbar. Sumber gambar: Pen. Lanud Abdulrachman Saleh
http://angkasa.co.id/info/militer/a...puh-hawk-200-tni-au-ini-kembali-ke-sarangnya/
Komandan Depohar 30 Kolonel Tek M. Yani Rudiansyah menyerahkan pesawat Hawk 200 TT-0214 usai menjalani perawatan Major Servicing 2.000 jam terbang kepada Letkol Pnb Adhi Safarul Akbar. Sumber gambar: Pen. Lanud Abdulrachman Saleh
http://angkasa.co.id/info/militer/a...puh-hawk-200-tni-au-ini-kembali-ke-sarangnya/
Last edited:
satria
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2016
- Messages
- 19
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Nelayan china sampai ratusan masuk perairan malon saja dibiarin, memamg TLDM tak punya power & nyali, coba apa pernah pesawat malonjing intercept..
initial_d_mk2
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2016
- Messages
- 122
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Quit it guys, don't let this malaysian troll ruin our beloved indonesian thread and feed his sick inferiority ego, ignored him.
kaka404
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2015
- Messages
- 177
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
i think you've misunderstood the situation a little. the reason why any flight that passed by natuna air space don't have to report to jakarta flight controller is because of the fact that the airspace above natuna sea are manage by the singaporean flight controller. so any plane that are flying through that area must report to the singaporean flight control...
and it's not as "free" as you might've think. any flight that plan on flying trough that area still need to report, pay taxes and stuff, to the singaporean air traffic controller (of course indonesia also got a cut from that).
y'see indonesia have this flight information region treaty with singapore for that region... and singapore only, not with malaysian.
http://treaty.kemlu.go.id/uploads-pub/4286_SGP-1995-0020.pdf
ps: keep in mind that FIR is not equal to sovereignty. FIR is related to "aviation safety" issue. for example jakarta FIR also include australia's airsplace above the christmas island sector. it does not mean we have bought australian sovereignty over that island.
anas_nurhafidz
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2014
- Messages
- 1,382
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Penerbal
kaka404
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2015
- Messages
- 177
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
the following article is about US freedom of navigation. but i bought it up so that many can understand a little about indonesian sea territories.. which probably different with their own.
US freedom of navigation claims groundless
Since 2000, the US has included Indonesia in its report. Only one alleged excessive maritime claim by Indonesia is usually stated in the report, nonetheless since 2010, more than one claim have been filed against Indonesia. In fact, in 2014 there were three maritime claims listed.
The US is a signatory to the UN Convention on Law of the Sea ( UNCLOS ) but has not ratified the convention. On other hand, Indonesia has been cooperative in implementing UNCLOS since its inception in 1982. Furthermore, Indonesia has signed and ratified the instrument.
Now the question is whether the US unilateral act through publication of reports containing excessive maritime claims should be considered a concern by other states?
In my view, states should not consider this issue something urgent and rather table it through the bilateral track. Speaking of Indonesia, in the 2014 DoD report, Indonesia is alleged to have exercised excessive maritime claims in three aspects: partial designation of archipelagic sea lanes, prior notification required for foreign warships to enter the territorial sea and the archipelagic waters and restriction on stopping, dropping anchor, or cruising without legitimate reasons in seas adjoining the territorial sea.
Article 53 ( 1 ) UNCLOS regulates designation of archipelagic sea lane passage by archipelagic states. Indonesia, in accordance with Article 53 ( 9 ) has proposed the establishment of the Archipelagic Sea Lane Passage of Indonesia ( ALKI ) to the International Maritime Organization ( IMO ).
As a result, Indonesia has set ALKI as mandated by Article 53 ( 1 ) UNCLOS and regulated it into national law through Government Decree No. 37/2002.
Determination of ALKI is based on the 69th Maritime Safety Committee ( MSC ) held in London on May 11-20, 1998. Nonetheless, in its decision, the MSC awarded partial designation of ALKI.
One of its considerations was that ALKI had not included an East-West route. This is why the US has alleged Indonesia of exercising excessive maritime claims.
To accommodate various views of foreign states that have not fully accepted the designation awarded by the IMO, Indonesia has reached an agreement with the US and Australia in providing the right of innocent passage over archipelagic waters, known as “19 Rules Agreed by the US, Australia and Indonesia on the exercise on archipelagic sea lanes passage”.
Furthermore, in accordance with Article 53 ( 12 ), even though Indonesia has not designated an East-West route, the right of archipelagic sea lanes passage may still be exercised through the routes normally used for international navigation.
Government Decree No. 8/1962 required prior notification for warships entering the territorial sea and archipelagic waters of Indonesia.
The decree was then replaced by Government Decree No. 37/2002 on the rights and obligations of foreign ships and aircraft in implementing the rights of archipelagic Sea lane passage through designated archipelagic sea lanes, which scraps the provision on prior notification.
Notifications are only required for foreign warships intending to stop at Indonesian ports.
Pursuant to the third maritime excessive claim, Indonesia has never set any restriction as such in seas adjoining its territorial waters. The marine area adjoining the territorial sea is the contiguous zone, which is also part of Economic Exclusive Zone ( EEZ ).
As stipulated in Article 33 of UNCLOS, in the contiguous zone, states are authorized to conduct necessary coastal surveillance in order to prevent violations of laws and regulations, customs, fiscal and immigration.
There is no provision in the contiguous zone regime that specifically prohibits foreign ships to stop, anchor and cruise without any reason in the contiguous zone.
In the EEZ, as stipulated in section 5 UNCLOS ( articles 55-75 ), a coastal state has sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring and exploiting, conserving and managing the natural resources, whether living or non-living, of the waters superjacent to the seabed and of the seabed and its subsoil, and with regard to other activities for the economic exploitation and exploration of the zone.
Article 73 of UNCLOS, which regulates law enforcement in the EEZ, says coastal states may take such measures, including boarding, inspection, arrest and judicial proceedings, as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the laws and regulations that was determined in accordance with the provisions of UNCLOS.
In the EEZ regime, there is no specific arrangement that prohibits foreign ships to stop, anchor or cruise without legitimate reason.
Nonetheless, coastal states may take action as stipulated in Article 73 UNCLOS in such circumstances where foreign vessels violate the national laws governing its sovereign rights in the EEZ.
In conclusion, the three claims directed against Indonesia by the US should not be included in its report as they do not represent the prevailing Indonesian legal provisions governing maritime area.
This unilateral act should not continue.
The allegations should instead be discussed with the states mentioned on the list. Bilateral forums are more appropriate and effective in addressing and resolving allegations of excessive maritime claims of states.
***
The author is writing a PhD thesis on maritime security challenges in Southeast Asia at the Australian National Center for Ocean Resources and Security, University of Wollongong, Australia.
http://www.thejakartapost.com/academia/2016/06/03/us-freedom-of-navigation-claims-groundless.html
so if you have a ship and wanna cross indonesia, please do so. we've provided indonesian archipelagic sea lane just for that... wanna stop by and anchor, go on. but don't exploit our natural resource. and if the authorities wanna inspect your ship don't run away, it just make you look more suspicious. if you're on a warship, however, obviously you need to report first.
foreign ships entering indonesian water does not mean they've "trampled" indonesian sovereignty. it only mean that indonesia, as one of the vary few archipelagic state in this world, has uphold its right and done its responsibility accordingly.
US freedom of navigation claims groundless
- Ahmad Almaududy Amri
Since 2000, the US has included Indonesia in its report. Only one alleged excessive maritime claim by Indonesia is usually stated in the report, nonetheless since 2010, more than one claim have been filed against Indonesia. In fact, in 2014 there were three maritime claims listed.
The US is a signatory to the UN Convention on Law of the Sea ( UNCLOS ) but has not ratified the convention. On other hand, Indonesia has been cooperative in implementing UNCLOS since its inception in 1982. Furthermore, Indonesia has signed and ratified the instrument.
Now the question is whether the US unilateral act through publication of reports containing excessive maritime claims should be considered a concern by other states?
In my view, states should not consider this issue something urgent and rather table it through the bilateral track. Speaking of Indonesia, in the 2014 DoD report, Indonesia is alleged to have exercised excessive maritime claims in three aspects: partial designation of archipelagic sea lanes, prior notification required for foreign warships to enter the territorial sea and the archipelagic waters and restriction on stopping, dropping anchor, or cruising without legitimate reasons in seas adjoining the territorial sea.
Article 53 ( 1 ) UNCLOS regulates designation of archipelagic sea lane passage by archipelagic states. Indonesia, in accordance with Article 53 ( 9 ) has proposed the establishment of the Archipelagic Sea Lane Passage of Indonesia ( ALKI ) to the International Maritime Organization ( IMO ).
As a result, Indonesia has set ALKI as mandated by Article 53 ( 1 ) UNCLOS and regulated it into national law through Government Decree No. 37/2002.
Determination of ALKI is based on the 69th Maritime Safety Committee ( MSC ) held in London on May 11-20, 1998. Nonetheless, in its decision, the MSC awarded partial designation of ALKI.
One of its considerations was that ALKI had not included an East-West route. This is why the US has alleged Indonesia of exercising excessive maritime claims.
To accommodate various views of foreign states that have not fully accepted the designation awarded by the IMO, Indonesia has reached an agreement with the US and Australia in providing the right of innocent passage over archipelagic waters, known as “19 Rules Agreed by the US, Australia and Indonesia on the exercise on archipelagic sea lanes passage”.
Furthermore, in accordance with Article 53 ( 12 ), even though Indonesia has not designated an East-West route, the right of archipelagic sea lanes passage may still be exercised through the routes normally used for international navigation.
Government Decree No. 8/1962 required prior notification for warships entering the territorial sea and archipelagic waters of Indonesia.
The decree was then replaced by Government Decree No. 37/2002 on the rights and obligations of foreign ships and aircraft in implementing the rights of archipelagic Sea lane passage through designated archipelagic sea lanes, which scraps the provision on prior notification.
Notifications are only required for foreign warships intending to stop at Indonesian ports.
Pursuant to the third maritime excessive claim, Indonesia has never set any restriction as such in seas adjoining its territorial waters. The marine area adjoining the territorial sea is the contiguous zone, which is also part of Economic Exclusive Zone ( EEZ ).
As stipulated in Article 33 of UNCLOS, in the contiguous zone, states are authorized to conduct necessary coastal surveillance in order to prevent violations of laws and regulations, customs, fiscal and immigration.
There is no provision in the contiguous zone regime that specifically prohibits foreign ships to stop, anchor and cruise without any reason in the contiguous zone.
In the EEZ, as stipulated in section 5 UNCLOS ( articles 55-75 ), a coastal state has sovereign rights for the purpose of exploring and exploiting, conserving and managing the natural resources, whether living or non-living, of the waters superjacent to the seabed and of the seabed and its subsoil, and with regard to other activities for the economic exploitation and exploration of the zone.
Article 73 of UNCLOS, which regulates law enforcement in the EEZ, says coastal states may take such measures, including boarding, inspection, arrest and judicial proceedings, as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the laws and regulations that was determined in accordance with the provisions of UNCLOS.
In the EEZ regime, there is no specific arrangement that prohibits foreign ships to stop, anchor or cruise without legitimate reason.
Nonetheless, coastal states may take action as stipulated in Article 73 UNCLOS in such circumstances where foreign vessels violate the national laws governing its sovereign rights in the EEZ.
In conclusion, the three claims directed against Indonesia by the US should not be included in its report as they do not represent the prevailing Indonesian legal provisions governing maritime area.
This unilateral act should not continue.
The allegations should instead be discussed with the states mentioned on the list. Bilateral forums are more appropriate and effective in addressing and resolving allegations of excessive maritime claims of states.
***
The author is writing a PhD thesis on maritime security challenges in Southeast Asia at the Australian National Center for Ocean Resources and Security, University of Wollongong, Australia.
http://www.thejakartapost.com/academia/2016/06/03/us-freedom-of-navigation-claims-groundless.html
so if you have a ship and wanna cross indonesia, please do so. we've provided indonesian archipelagic sea lane just for that... wanna stop by and anchor, go on. but don't exploit our natural resource. and if the authorities wanna inspect your ship don't run away, it just make you look more suspicious. if you're on a warship, however, obviously you need to report first.
foreign ships entering indonesian water does not mean they've "trampled" indonesian sovereignty. it only mean that indonesia, as one of the vary few archipelagic state in this world, has uphold its right and done its responsibility accordingly.
Last edited:
katarabhumi
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2013
- Messages
- 908
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
The new troll wannabe, I don't think he's a malay at all. Ignore him.
Star Bugs
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2016
- Messages
- 152
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
The origin of the name 'Malaysia'.
The name Malaysia comes from the word 'mal-Asia' or 'malasia' with the prefix mal-. Google to any dictionaries, and you will find the prefix mal- means "bad or badly; wrong or wrongly; imperfect or defective."
You may know words like malnutrition, malfunction, malpractice, and so forth. So malasia means "wrong Asia", "bad Asia" or " defective Asia".
So that's a little historical truth about the the name 'Malaysia' which originated from the word mal-Asia, a defective Asian country.
The name Malaysia comes from the word 'mal-Asia' or 'malasia' with the prefix mal-. Google to any dictionaries, and you will find the prefix mal- means "bad or badly; wrong or wrongly; imperfect or defective."
You may know words like malnutrition, malfunction, malpractice, and so forth. So malasia means "wrong Asia", "bad Asia" or " defective Asia".
So that's a little historical truth about the the name 'Malaysia' which originated from the word mal-Asia, a defective Asian country.
faries
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2015
- Messages
- 427
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
agree with you, his comment fluently in bahasa indonesia, different with native malaysian speaker usually do...Actually I dont like to confront with Malaysian because I have many relatives there, and they really good...just different with their government and some ultranationalist troller in their forum.
Nike
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2013
- Messages
- 13,867
- Reaction score
- 24
- Country
- Location
Tougher Antiterrorism Law Expected to Be Completed in October
Jakarta. A government-proposed bill that seeks to give the authorities more powers to act against alleged terrorists and suspects, is expected to be completed in three months, a lawmaker said on Friday (22/07).
Revisions to the 2003 Antiterrorism Law are being deliberated by the House of Representatives, which has been inviting various members of the community, ranging from security experts to rights activists and Islamic scholars, to provide input.
"We're still gathering inputs from related bodies as well as various elements of the public for now," said Arsul Sani, a member of the special committee in the House that is dealing with the bill.
The revisions include longer periods of detention without trial, which has prompted activists to warn that it could undermine human rights.
The maximum period authorities will be allowed to hold an alleged terrorist following an arrest will be increased to 30 days from seven days stipulated in the existing law and the 24 hours under the criminal code.
The maximum period of detention of terror suspects without trial will also increase to 450 days from 180 days at present, as the bill seeks to extend preventive detention, which currently allows the authorities to keep alleged terrorists in specified locations for up to six months.
These moves have been opposed by rights activists, who allege that torture by law enforcers have been rampant in custody.
Experts have meanwhile called for counter-narrative measures against extremist ideologies alongside the revisions, while humanitarian workers have warned against neglecting the rights of terror victims.
"After those hearings, party factions will draw up problem inventory lists before handing them over in early August at the latest," Arsul told the Jakarta Globe.
"It is provisionally scheduled for conclusion in late October," the United Development Party (PPP) lawmaker added.
The government moved to revise the existing antiterrorism law in January, when attacks by Islamic State sympathizers in downtown Jakarta killed eight people.
Alert over terror threats has been heightened since the incident, which followed five other major attacks, the deadliest of which was the Bali bombing of 2002 that killed more than 200 people and injured 300.
http://jakartaglobe.beritasatu.com/news/tougher-antiterrorism-law-expected-completed-october/
Bhayangkara
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- May 2, 2015
- Messages
- 234
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Damn, I don't even think if they've contain such a prefix meaning
Well that's enough, just let him go queitly to their habitat
Nike
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2013
- Messages
- 13,867
- Reaction score
- 24
- Country
- Location
PERKUAT UNSUR KOARMATIM, EMPAT KAL DISAMBUT PANGARMATIM
Panglima Komando Armada RI Kawasan Timur (Pangarmatim) Laksamana Muda (Laksda) TNI Darwanto, S.H, M.A.P., dalam upacara penyambutan, menerima kedatangan Empat Kapal Angkatan Laut (KAL) Jenis Kapal Patroli yang akan memperkuat unsur Jajaran Komando Armada RI Kawasan Timur (Koarmatim), bertempat di dermaga F Koarmatim, Ujung, Surabaya, Selasa (5/7/2016).
Keempat KAL tersebut terdiri dari KAL Bawean dengan nomor lambung I-2, KAL Wayag 1-14-10, KAL Tidore 1-14-11, dan KAL Kelambau 1-13-49. Kapal-kapal buatan anak bangsa Indonesia ini merupakan bagian dari rencana strategis (renstra) TNI Angkatan Laut dalam upaya mewujudkan kekuatan Pokok Minimum TNI Angkatan Laut Tahun 2010 sampai dengan 2024.
Kedatangan KAL ditandai dengan laporan kedatangan oleh Komandan KAL Bawean yaitu Kapten Laut (P) Eska Yosef Wiratama kepada Pangarmatim, kemudian dilanjutkan peninjauan ke empat KAL oleh Pangarmatim yang di ikuti oleh seluruh Para Pejabat Utama Koarmatim dan Komandan Satuan Koarmatim serta Komandan Unsur yang berada di Pangkalan.
Dalam Admiral Inspection, Pangarmatim didampingi oleh Kepala Staf Koarmatim Laksamana Pertama (Laksma) TNI Mintoro Yulianto, S.Sos.,M.Si., meninjau langsung fisik kapal, fasilitas, dan berbagai kemampuan yang dimilikinya. Saat onboard di KAL Bawean, Pangarmatim menyampaikan pengarahan kepada para Komandan Kapal beserta Anak Buah Kapal (ABK), agar selalu menjaga kesiapsiagaan saat melaksanakan tugas sebagai salah satu unsur Koarmatim, dengan mengutamakan keselamatan personil maupun meteriil. Selain itu, Pangarmatim berpesan untuk selalu merawat kapal dengan baik, menjaga kekompakan antar ABK, serta menjaga kebersihan kapal, dan menghindari penyebab terjadinya kebakaran atau kerusakan yang lain.
Untuk KAL Bawean I-2 merupakan jenis PC-P (PC 32) dengan Komandan Kapal yaitu Kapten Laut (P) Eska Yosef Wiratama. Memiliki panjang max kapal 36,8 meter dan lebar max kapal 6,5 meter, kapal ini di buat pada tahun 2015 dan resmi bergabung dengan TNI AL pada 16 Juni 2016. KAL Bawean dipercaya bergabung dan memperkuat jajaran Satuan Kapal Bantu (Satban) Koarmatim.
Adapun ketiga kapal lainnya yaitu, KAL Wayag 1-14-10, KAL Kelambau 1-13-49 dan KAL Tidore 1-14-11 merupakan jenis Kapal Patroli Cepat type 28 yang di buat oleh PT. Karimun Anugerah sejati. Selanjutnya, KAL Wayag 1-14-10 dipercaya bergabung untuk memperkuat Lantamal XIV, Sorong dengan Komandan Kapal Kapten Laut (P) Eko Hadi Suwarno. Sedangkan KAL Kelambau 1-13-49 akan memperkuat jajaran Unsur Lanal Kota Baru di bawah pimpinan Komandan Kapal Kapten Laut (P) Mauludin. Dan KAL Tidore 1-14-11 dipercaya bergabung memperkuat Lanal Ternate dengan Komandan Kapal Kapten Laut (P) Habiby Achmad.
(Dispenarmatim)
http://www.tnial.mil.id/News/Operas...Type/ArticleView/articleId/30016/Default.aspx
Panglima Komando Armada RI Kawasan Timur (Pangarmatim) Laksamana Muda (Laksda) TNI Darwanto, S.H, M.A.P., dalam upacara penyambutan, menerima kedatangan Empat Kapal Angkatan Laut (KAL) Jenis Kapal Patroli yang akan memperkuat unsur Jajaran Komando Armada RI Kawasan Timur (Koarmatim), bertempat di dermaga F Koarmatim, Ujung, Surabaya, Selasa (5/7/2016).
Keempat KAL tersebut terdiri dari KAL Bawean dengan nomor lambung I-2, KAL Wayag 1-14-10, KAL Tidore 1-14-11, dan KAL Kelambau 1-13-49. Kapal-kapal buatan anak bangsa Indonesia ini merupakan bagian dari rencana strategis (renstra) TNI Angkatan Laut dalam upaya mewujudkan kekuatan Pokok Minimum TNI Angkatan Laut Tahun 2010 sampai dengan 2024.
Kedatangan KAL ditandai dengan laporan kedatangan oleh Komandan KAL Bawean yaitu Kapten Laut (P) Eska Yosef Wiratama kepada Pangarmatim, kemudian dilanjutkan peninjauan ke empat KAL oleh Pangarmatim yang di ikuti oleh seluruh Para Pejabat Utama Koarmatim dan Komandan Satuan Koarmatim serta Komandan Unsur yang berada di Pangkalan.
Dalam Admiral Inspection, Pangarmatim didampingi oleh Kepala Staf Koarmatim Laksamana Pertama (Laksma) TNI Mintoro Yulianto, S.Sos.,M.Si., meninjau langsung fisik kapal, fasilitas, dan berbagai kemampuan yang dimilikinya. Saat onboard di KAL Bawean, Pangarmatim menyampaikan pengarahan kepada para Komandan Kapal beserta Anak Buah Kapal (ABK), agar selalu menjaga kesiapsiagaan saat melaksanakan tugas sebagai salah satu unsur Koarmatim, dengan mengutamakan keselamatan personil maupun meteriil. Selain itu, Pangarmatim berpesan untuk selalu merawat kapal dengan baik, menjaga kekompakan antar ABK, serta menjaga kebersihan kapal, dan menghindari penyebab terjadinya kebakaran atau kerusakan yang lain.
Untuk KAL Bawean I-2 merupakan jenis PC-P (PC 32) dengan Komandan Kapal yaitu Kapten Laut (P) Eska Yosef Wiratama. Memiliki panjang max kapal 36,8 meter dan lebar max kapal 6,5 meter, kapal ini di buat pada tahun 2015 dan resmi bergabung dengan TNI AL pada 16 Juni 2016. KAL Bawean dipercaya bergabung dan memperkuat jajaran Satuan Kapal Bantu (Satban) Koarmatim.
Adapun ketiga kapal lainnya yaitu, KAL Wayag 1-14-10, KAL Kelambau 1-13-49 dan KAL Tidore 1-14-11 merupakan jenis Kapal Patroli Cepat type 28 yang di buat oleh PT. Karimun Anugerah sejati. Selanjutnya, KAL Wayag 1-14-10 dipercaya bergabung untuk memperkuat Lantamal XIV, Sorong dengan Komandan Kapal Kapten Laut (P) Eko Hadi Suwarno. Sedangkan KAL Kelambau 1-13-49 akan memperkuat jajaran Unsur Lanal Kota Baru di bawah pimpinan Komandan Kapal Kapten Laut (P) Mauludin. Dan KAL Tidore 1-14-11 dipercaya bergabung memperkuat Lanal Ternate dengan Komandan Kapal Kapten Laut (P) Habiby Achmad.
(Dispenarmatim)
http://www.tnial.mil.id/News/Operas...Type/ArticleView/articleId/30016/Default.aspx
Similar threads
