"Supportive of Islamic Revolution and of Iran". Now that's contradictory because Nika and other protesters who were killed by the mullah forces and those who agitate against the mullah forces are Irani as well. Or did they transfer two months from Mars or North Korea ?
I was referring to the Iranian nation-state.
There's no evidence that Shahkarami was killed by Iranian law enforcement. That's what NATO regimes and their media mouthpieces pretend, I see you're rehashing their accusations uncritically.
Also those rioters you refer to as protesters, who murdered over 60 law enforcement personnel, may be Iranians but they're objectively acting against the stability and safety of their nation, whether they realize it or not.
And who are this Free Masons that some keep talking about ? I am a secular, so were Nasser, Muammar, Lenin, Marx, Castro and yes, Bashar you keep using as a positive point but are we all under mind control of these Free Masons ? Where might I have found their gatherings in India to become influenced by them ? And books produced by them ? Websites ?
You may conduct some research to find out more. Masonry being a secret society, does not mean it doesn't exist.
I did not incriminate any of the leaders you mentioned. But it doesn't imply masonry isn't promoting secularism as well.
Also President Bashar al-Assad of Syria definitely doesn't share your ideas about Islamic Iran, nor did his late father and predecessor Hafez al-Assad. Hence why Syria entered a strategic relationship with Tehran. Cuba has also had very constructive mutual relations with the Islamic Republic, featuring delightful episodes such as Iran jamming USA satellite signals from Cuban soil.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/media-july-dec03-jamming_07-17
Contemplate the radiant countenances. What fantastic sight. Is it not high time to act like those leaders and embrace the staunchly anti-imperialist, anti-zionist revolutionary government of Iran, the one and only bulwark against zio-American domination of West Asia?
Has NATO or its local enforcer, Israel government, ever bombed Irani government nuclear facilities the same way that they did against Iraq in 1981 and Syria in 2007 ?
They sabotaged Iran's nuclear facilities with explosive materials, namely the centrifuge assembly hall at Natanz. They murdered several Iranian nuclear scientists. They sanctioned Islamic Iran under the nuclear pretext. Which of course makes your definition of "support" rather bizarre.
As for direct military aggression, I addressed this already: Iran has sufficient deterrence power to make any such move by NATO or the zionist regime too costly for the latter. Syria and Iraq did not benefit from such a capability. Hence why Syria relied on significant Iranian and Russian assistance for survival, and why Iraq was dependent on full fledged support from both global power blocs of the time to be able to attack Iran.
By the way, Isra"el" isn't simply NATO's local enforcer. The zionists largely dominate western regimes through their networks of influence.
In fact it was the Irani mullah government which supplied an Irani government man who guided Israeli planes towards the Iraqi reactor.
This is a fabrication.
But the collaboration of Iran mullah regime and Israel government was
quite early :
Every mullah regime or movement was seeded by NATO and that includes the Iran one.
Untrue as well. Note that the source is a zionist regime official, I'm at a loss as to how it could be deemed credible. Moreover the USA-based author citing the zionist official is known to be close to the western-absolving reformist faction in Iran.
Also, something of this nature (Isra"el"i planes landing in Iran) would not have gone unnoticed. It's gibberish.
A proxy war erupted between Iran and the zionist entity with the 1979 Islamic Revolution, since the new government in Iran immediately began backing Palestinian Resistance factions. The Islamic Revolution is of anti-zionist orientation through and through. Imam Khomeini (rA.a.) had consistently denounced the relationship between the toppled monarchy and the zionist occupation regime. This was in fact one of the main reasons behind the 15th Khordad uprising of 1963, when the Imam (rA.a.) openly denounced the western-backed shah as an illegitimate ruler and called for his overthrow.
Other than taking over the USA's so-called embassy and arresting the spies it was housing - with the exception of females and Black Americans though, who were permitted to leave, Iran also shut down the diplomatic representation the shah had allowed Tel Aviv to operate in Tehran. It was replaced with a Palestinian embassy. Isra"el"is present on Iranian soil proceeded to flee head over heals (one of the slogans of Islamic revolutionaries was: "if you see a Jew, protect them. If you see a zionist, kill them"). The head of the local zionist network, Habibollah Elqanian, was sentenced to capital punishment and executed.
The Islamic Republic and the zionist occupation regime were and have always been unreconcilable enemies.
1. Can you give more details of these NATO-allied leftists please ?
Where should I start?
Let's go back all the way to Leon Trotsky himself. After being banished from the USSR and settling in Mexico, he deposed before the House Un-American activities against the leaders of the Communist Party of the United States of America, namely Earl Browder and William Foster. Ever since, Troskyism spawned various NATO-aligned elements. Including the Trotskyist opposition to the revolutionary government of Venezuela.
www.revolutionarydemocracy.org
The Sino-American strategic cooperation consecutive to the Sino-Soviet split offers another set of examples. Washington and Beijing were then aligned for some time on their Southeast Asian policy, not least in their joint backing of Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge of Cambodia.
A third set of cases is that of the CIA's promotion of so-called "cultural Marxism" and "Freudo-Marxist" currents, in line with capitalism's tilt towards societal liberalism post-WW2 and especially since the late 1960's. In reality, the 1968 student movements served the interests of capital and thus of its political super-structure, NATO. As Michel Clouscard masterfully demonstrated, capitalism's continued expansion after WW2 presupposed the propagation of an ideology of desire.
Feminism falls under the same category. Which is why certain feminist figures did not shy away from admitting to their cooperation with the CIA:
This whole issue is well understood by what I'd describe as the authentic, intelligent left. It realizes how the CIA has been cultivating a fake left in pursuit of its agenda. Imperialist powers have a long history of engineering fake opposition with the aim of delegitimizing actual opposition in the eyes of whomever it might attract. This kind of subversion was explicitly theorized by a British military officer in the context of the UK regime's attempts at squashing the anti-colonialist Mau Mau rebellion in Kenya.
And since the talk was about Iran, let us top the list by adding these supposed "warriors against NATO", the leftist MKO terrorist cult:
Just eight months ago, John Bolton told members of a cult-like Iranian exile group that "before 2019" they would be ruling Iran.
theintercept.com
Even though the MKO leadership has ceased believing in a coherent ideology, they have their roots on the left, still indoctrinate their rank and file with "Marxist" theory and continue to be classified as a radical left wing organization.
And here's a prominent Iranian feminist propagandist, known for the campaign she launched - out of an upscale mansion in Washington D.C. acquired thanks to funds she receives from the USA regime, inciting female Iranians to violate the dress code and remove their hejab in public. Admire yet another wonderful "progressivist frontline fighter against NATO":
https://www.rfi.fr/en/international...n-rights-activists-praises-women-s-revolution
U.S. President Joe Biden on Thursday vowed to "free" Iran, and said that demonstrators working against the country's government would soon succeed in freeing themselves.
www.reuters.com
I should add, every one of the Iranian communist micro-grouplets in exile is based in the west, and they too are on the payroll of NATO regimes, as the entire opposition to the Islamic Republic.
But of course, the NATO proxy "is the Islamic Republic", whilst its opponents are "resisting NATO" - in friendly photo shoots and meetings with NATO officials in which they plot how to overthrow the Islamic Republic, that is!
Given the above, you just re-defined the terms friend and foe.
2. So you mean the antagonism between USA government and USSR was fake ? That the thousands of nuclear weapons pointed at each other and prepared to be dropped at each other were water balloons ?
Is this what I claimed?
3. I have met co-leftists in my city and they have been heavily anti-NATO and anti-Capitalism.
Meet up with any of the above mentioned leftist elements and ask them why they accept aid from NATO regimes.
OTOH those movements who forcibly takeover countries and designate them "Islamic Republic of..." are always NATO-seeded or NATO-enabled, whether this be Khomenei's regime or the Taliban.
The Islamic Republic of Iran resulted from a popular revolution. The Iranian people overwhelmingly voted for the Islamic Republic in a referendum. Its constitution was also legitimized by a referendum. There's was no forcible takeover, therefore.
The Islamic Revolution under the leadership of Imam Khomeini (rA.a.) toppled the very archetype of a USA vassal regime, that of the last shah Mohammad-Reza Pahlavi, who owed his throne to the 1953 CIA coup against then Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadeq. In 1979 however, the Americans were booted out of Iran, their spy den (so-called embassy) was neutralized, their businesses shut down, their military advisers expelled and so on. Their never ending, rabid rage against Iran is due to the fact that the Islamic Revolution shook off the American yoke and restored Iran's independence, sovereignty and self-determination.
Your contention is literally inverting historic reality. And it's a baseless claim, not substantiated by any evidence.
But Indos, it is so disappointing to see you convert into a superstition-believing mullah like it is my disappointment with @SalarHaqq who has also turned into a mullah and is supporting the Irani terrorist mullah regime which is being defended by NATO ( and I will reply soon to Salar's replies to me ).
