Indo-Israeli LR-SAM will challenge Chinese Navy in the Indian Ocean: Chinese Military specialist

[$@rJen]

No way... It has only 80km coverage... Chinese dingdong can be fired from SCS to take out a IN ship in IOR like mentioned by Chinese Barak 8 is waste of money

for trade balance with Russia, how many system they bought just 2 to 3 system of S-400 main AD system remain HQ-9 and its version for China and how many Su--35 is inventory in China just 24 main AD jet is and will be remain J-11, J-10 series, and submarine is bought by China From Russia and what world class expert says it one of the best LRSAM @MULUBJA

For trade balance thy bought billions worth of defense products... And you want the world to believe it you failed the education or did the education fail you

 

[Ultima Thule]

No way... It has only 80km coverage... Chinese dingdong can be fired from SCS to take out a IN ship in IOR like mentioned by Chinese Barak 8 is waste of money

is so called you blah blah blah- 8 system are better system than SM-3, SM-6, Aster- 30, S-300 (naval version) HHQ-9 please answer me @$@rJen the world navies is stupid that they develop specific short range SAM like US RAM, Chinese FL-3000 and UK's CAMM for intercepting supersonic anti ship cruise missile, your blah blah blah-8 mainly anti aircraft missiles with limited against supersonic anti ship cruise missile think @$@rJen

No way... It has only 80km coverage... Chinese dingdong can be fired from SCS to take out a IN ship in IOR like mentioned by Chinese Barak 8 is waste of money

and Indian Dingdong aka BRAHMOUSE fire at Chinese ship and they will not able to defend Indian Sh!t dindong (BRAHMOUSE) they have better system than your blah blah blah -8 in the form FL-3000 specifically designed to intercept supersonic anti ship cruise missiles sorry to burst your bubble @$@rJen

For trade balance thy bought billions worth of defense products... And you want the world to believe it you failed the education or did the education fail you

how many S-400 they will get 3 -4 i am only trying to say that main AD system for China remains HQ-9 and its advance versions you stupid @$@rJen

 

[$@rJen]

is so called you blah blah blah- 8 system are better system than SM-3, SM-6, Aster- 30, S-300 (naval version) HHQ-9 please answer me @$@rJen the world navies is stupid that they develop specific short range SAM like US RAM, Chinese FL-3000 and UK's CAMM for intercepting supersonic anti ship cruise missile, your blah blah blah-8 mainly anti aircraft missiles with limited against supersonic anti ship cruise missile think

Lol.... I never mentioned it's better than the ones you mentioned... And to be specific it's developed specifically against supersonic AshM.... It's development was involved with brahmos...

and Indian Dingdong aka BRAHMOUSE fire at Chinese ship and they will not able to defend Indian Sh!t dindong (BRAHMOUSE) they have better system than your blah blah blah -8 in the form FL-3000 specifically designed to intercept supersonic anti ship cruise missiles sorry to burst your bubble @$@rJen

Kid... Never claimed as Chinese keyboard warriors claims and yes... Brahmos is currently one of the best anti shipping missiles... If within reach it has higher chance of hitting than firing a dingdong from SCS towards IOR to Target a INS

how many S-400 they will get 3 -4 i am only trying to say that main AD system for China remains HQ-9 and its advance versions you stupid @$@rJen

advance version

Lol... It's a copy of S series
Now lol... They'll use s400 to cover most sensitive targets as HQ is much inferior to S400.... Lol... Trade in balance was epic

 

[Ultima Thule]

Lol.... I never mentioned it's better than the ones you mentioned... And to be specific it's developed specifically against supersonic AshM.... It's development was involved with brahmos...

its a active guided SAM kid most of the world navies develop IR guided short range SAM system against supersonic anti ship missiles, are they stupid to develop IR short SAM system to counter supersonic AshM like US RAM, Chinese FL-3000 and UK CAMM, answer me for that question kid @$@rJen

Kid... Never claimed as Chinese keyboard warriors claims and yes... Brahmos is currently one of the best anti shipping missiles... If within reach it has higher chance of hitting than firing a dingdong from SCS towards IOR to Target a INS

Yeah yeah your BRAHMOUSE is out of this universe 10000000000 gen ahead from rest of the world kid main concern of world navies are not all supersonic AshM because they have big IR and RADR RCS that means they easliy detectable, track able, and engage-able with short range system like US RAM, FL-3000 and UK CAMM , You're again wrong main threat for western naval forces is not all supersonic supersonic ANTISHIP missiles because they have big IR and radar RCS which mean they are easily detectable,trackable and engageable from sophisticated short range SAM like US RAM,Chinese FL-3000 and UK CAMM, the main threats for western navies is Russian sizzlar type weapons (SUBSONIC AT CRUISE WITH TERMINAL SUPERSONIC DASH) because at subsonic cruise they very low radar and IR RCS and terminal Sprint to the target have less time reaction time to react even in 90s older sea sparrow of USN successfully intercepts supersonic ANTISHIP missiles in tests think think again you stupid @$@rJen and doens't have the multilayered SAM on their ship in the form of HHQ-9, HQ-16B and specifically designed against supersonic AshM FL-3000 what loser you're mr stupid @$@rJen

advance version

Lol... It's a copy of S series
Now lol... They'll use s400 to cover most sensitive targets as HQ is much inferior to S400.... Lol... Trade in balance was epic

take a look you insane
Variants[edit]

• FD-2000 - First revealed in the 8th Zhuhai Airshow, the export version of HQ-9, providing extra anti-stealth capability by incorporating YLC-20 passive radar sensor as an option.[16] FD-2000 made its name by once securing Turkish surface-to-air missile contract, later cancelled due to political reasons. FD2000's reaction time from radar contact to missile engagement is around 12–15 seconds. It covers an area of 49000 square kilometres. FD-2000 was on exhibition in Zhuhai Airshow 2014.[17]
• FT-2000 - Anti radiation version that was the first model of HQ-9 family being completed.

HQ-9 after the 70th anniversary of the end of WWII parade held in Beijing.

• HQ-9 - TVM version SAM.
• HHQ-9 — Naval version.[18]
• HQ-9A — Upgraded version, first tested in 1999 and service entry in 2001.[18] Chinese sources claim that the HQ-9 family of systems employ much newer computing technology than imported Russian S-300PMU/PMU1/PMU2 systems, because HQ-9 is developed more than a decade later, thus allowing it to incorporate advancement in microelectronics. Due to the superior computing capability for signal processing, data processing and guidance support, this missile can have an optional semi-active radar homing (SARH) mode, because more info can be processed on board the missile itself.

PLANS Changchun (150) equip HHQ-9.

• HHQ-9A — Ship-borne naval version of HQ-9A. Eight 6-cell vertical launch silos, of cylindrical shape and using "cold launch"method, mounted on the Type 052C destroyer (48 missiles in total).[19]
• HQ-9B — reportedly tested in February 2006.[18] According to Jane's Information Group, this missile has a dual seeker that incorporates both SARH & infrared homingmode [20]
• HQ-9C - Currently under development, incorporating active radar homingmode.
• HQ-19 - A vastly upgraded version of HQ-9 to counter ballistic missile and satellites on the lower end of Low Earth orbits, and it is the Chinese equivalent of THAAD.[21] HQ-19 is armed with a dual purpose exospherekinetic kill vehicle (kkv) warhead designed by a team led by Professor Zhou Jun (周军), which can be used against ballistic missile warheads or satellites.[22] Its first flight occurred in 2003; since then, the missile has conducted several other tests, including one on November 1, 2015.[23][24]
• SC-19 - HQ-19 derivative using Kaituozhe-1 space booster as engine instead of the original engine used in HQ-9/19. Due to the size difference of engines, SC-19 also has to adopt a new launcher/transporter designated as KT-409.[25] Like HQ-19, SC-19 can also be used to counter either ballistic missile or satellite on the lower end of low Earth orbits.
• HQ-26 - Chinese equivalent of SM-3 for naval deployment,[21] upgraded HQ-9/19 equipped with a dual pulse solid rocket motor for the final stage like SM-3.[26] Its certification is expected in 2015 at the earliest.[27]
• HQ-29 - Chinese equivalent of MIM-104F (PAC-3) (PAC-3), with engine upgrade for the final stage: instead of a single dual pulse solid rocket motor, HQ-29 is equipped with over a hundred tiny pulse solid rocket motors mounted in the forebody of the missile,[21] but the exact number remain unknown due to lack of publicized information. Its first flight was achieved in 2011 and it is expected to be deployed by the end of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan.[28] At least one additional test was conducted in 2013.

its hybrid b/w S-series and US patriots you retard head @$@rJen
yes they will use it along with HQ-9 @$@rJen
$@rJen if you have butthurt use this on your butts

its pain killer for you @$@rJen

 

[$@rJen]

its a active guided SAM kid most of the world navies develop IR guided short range SAM system against supersonic anti ship missiles, are they stupid to develop IR short SAM system to counter supersonic AshM like US RAM, Chinese FL-3000 and UK CAMM, answer me for that question kid @$@rJen

What type of moron are you!?? Barak-8 is medium to long range SAM why are you bringing point defense SAM here??

Yeah yeah your BRAHMOUSE is out of this universe 10000000000 gen ahead from rest of the world kid main concern of world navies are not all supersonic AshM because they have big IR and RADR RCS that means they easliy detectable, track able, and engage-able with short range system like US RAM, FL-3000 and UK CAMM , You're again wrong main threat for western naval forces is not all supersonic supersonic ANTISHIP missiles because they have big IR and radar RCS which mean they are easily detectable,trackable and engageable from sophisticated short range SAM like US RAM,Chinese FL-3000 and UK CAMM, the main threats for western navies is Russian sizzlar type weapons (SUBSONIC AT CRUISE WITH TERMINAL SUPERSONIC DASH) because at subsonic cruise they very low radar and IR RCS and terminal Sprint to the target have less time reaction time to react even in 90s older sea sparrow of USN successfully intercepts supersonic ANTISHIP missiles in tests think think again you stupid @$@rJen and doens't have the multilayered SAM on their ship in the form of HHQ-9, HQ-16B and specifically designed against supersonic AshM FL-3000 what loser you're mr stupid @$@rJen

What a farce !!!! Again and again you're bringing RAM... Do you know it's a point defense system with nearly 10km range?? So you expect to wait for the supersonic missiles to reach within 10km of your ship and take your chance??? Kid... You got the logic totally wrong, I don't even want to talk to you about it anymore...

We're talking about barak-8 but you are bringing point defense here ... You sound so stupid kiddo

take a look you insane
Variants[edit]

• FD-2000 - First revealed in the 8th Zhuhai Airshow, the export version of HQ-9, providing extra anti-stealth capability by incorporating YLC-20 passive radar sensor as an option.[16] FD-2000 made its name by once securing Turkish surface-to-air missile contract, later cancelled due to political reasons. FD2000's reaction time from radar contact to missile engagement is around 12–15 seconds. It covers an area of 49000 square kilometres. FD-2000 was on exhibition in Zhuhai Airshow 2014.[17]
• FT-2000 - Anti radiation version that was the first model of HQ-9 family being completed.

HQ-9 after the 70th anniversary of the end of WWII parade held in Beijing.

• HQ-9 - TVM version SAM.
• HHQ-9 — Naval version.[18]
• HQ-9A — Upgraded version, first tested in 1999 and service entry in 2001.[18] Chinese sources claim that the HQ-9 family of systems employ much newer computing technology than imported Russian S-300PMU/PMU1/PMU2 systems, because HQ-9 is developed more than a decade later, thus allowing it to incorporate advancement in microelectronics. Due to the superior computing capability for signal processing, data processing and guidance support, this missile can have an optional semi-active radar homing (SARH) mode, because more info can be processed on board the missile itself.

PLANS Changchun (150) equip HHQ-9.

• HHQ-9A — Ship-borne naval version of HQ-9A. Eight 6-cell vertical launch silos, of cylindrical shape and using "cold launch"method, mounted on the Type 052C destroyer (48 missiles in total).[19]
• HQ-9B — reportedly tested in February 2006.[18] According to Jane's Information Group, this missile has a dual seeker that incorporates both SARH & infrared homingmode [20]
• HQ-9C - Currently under development, incorporating active radar homingmode.
• HQ-19 - A vastly upgraded version of HQ-9 to counter ballistic missile and satellites on the lower end of Low Earth orbits, and it is the Chinese equivalent of THAAD.[21] HQ-19 is armed with a dual purpose exospherekinetic kill vehicle (kkv) warhead designed by a team led by Professor Zhou Jun (周军), which can be used against ballistic missile warheads or satellites.[22] Its first flight occurred in 2003; since then, the missile has conducted several other tests, including one on November 1, 2015.[23][24]
• SC-19 - HQ-19 derivative using Kaituozhe-1 space booster as engine instead of the original engine used in HQ-9/19. Due to the size difference of engines, SC-19 also has to adopt a new launcher/transporter designated as KT-409.[25] Like HQ-19, SC-19 can also be used to counter either ballistic missile or satellite on the lower end of low Earth orbits.
• HQ-26 - Chinese equivalent of SM-3 for naval deployment,[21] upgraded HQ-9/19 equipped with a dual pulse solid rocket motor for the final stage like SM-3.[26] Its certification is expected in 2015 at the earliest.[27]
• HQ-29 - Chinese equivalent of MIM-104F (PAC-3) (PAC-3), with engine upgrade for the final stage: instead of a single dual pulse solid rocket motor, HQ-29 is equipped with over a hundred tiny pulse solid rocket motors mounted in the forebody of the missile,[21] but the exact number remain unknown due to lack of publicized information. Its first flight was achieved in 2011 and it is expected to be deployed by the end of the Twelfth Five-Year Plan.[28] At least one additional test was conducted in 2013.

its hybrid b/w S-series and US patriots you retard head @$@rJen
yes they will use it along with HQ-9 @$@rJen
$@rJen if you have butthurt use this on your butts

You sound too too stupid kid.... Can you come out of your stupidity at once.... Read my comment again.... HQ itself a clone of S-300 ... Advanced version my @rse.. it's a damn system that's the reason they went with S400 in limited numbers and will reverse engineer as usual and claim it's andavced version then in future there'll be another order for S500 .....

Anyway... Trade in balance was epic

 

[Ultima Thule]

What type of moron are you!?? Barak-8 is medium to long range SAM why are you bringing point defense SAM

Because medium range active radar homing SAM has a less chance to intercept supersonic ANTISHIP missiles than IR point defense SAM educate yourself kid you guys always lives in delusions kids why USA developed RAM kid please answer my question you retard head @$@rJen

What a farce !!!! Again and again you're bringing RAM... Do you know it's a point defense system with nearly 10km range?? So you expect to wait for the supersonic missiles to reach within 10km of your ship and take your chance??? Kid... You got the logic totally wrong, I don't even want to talk to you about it anymore...

We're talking about barak-8 but you are bringing point defense here ... You sound so stupid kiddo

Because RAM has a better chance to intercept supersonic ANTISHIP missiles then your blah blah blah-8 kid, US RAM is specifically design to intercept supersonic ANTISHIP missiles you brain fart IR homing short range SAM has better chance to intercept supersonic ANTISHIP missiles than your active radar blah blah blah-8 you brain fart @$@rJen

You sound too too stupid kid.... Can you come out of your stupidity at once.... Read my comment again.... HQ itself a clone of S-300 ... Advanced version my @rse.. it's a damn system that's the reason they went with S400 in limited numbers and will reverse engineer as usual and claim it's andavced version then in future there'll be another order for S500 .....

You have just faces saving nothing else it uses tech from s300 and US some tech from patriot like track via missile can you copy blah blah blah-8 and first make your out of this universe cowpiss vedic 100000000 gen tej@$$ make your indigenous product kid and first 5 versions of HQ-9 is already operational kid if you have a butthurt use burnol kid its a pain killer kid you guys always lives in delusions you brain fart @$@rJen

 

[$@rJen]

Because medium range active radar homing SAM has a less chance to intercept supersonic ANTISHIP missiles than IR point defense SAM educate yourself kid you guys always lives in delusions kids why USA developed RAM kid please answer my question you retard head @$@rJen

where did you get your education?!!?

Dumbo.... RAM was developed in the time when Supersonic missiles were not there... Kid... Lol... Your so called advanced HQ9 itself uses active radar homing..... let's tell the Chinese to throw them away

Because RAM has a better chance to intercept supersonic ANTISHIP missiles then your blah blah blah-8 kid, US RAM is specifically design to intercept supersonic ANTISHIP missiles you brain fart IR homing short range SAM has better chance to intercept supersonic ANTISHIP missiles than your active radar blah blah blah-8 you brain fart @$@rJen

Who?? You professor told you?!!!
The commander at USN should get a heart attack now by seeing your reply... At 10km for a supersonic missile to get to the target is some seconds... You're going to rely on a point defense to take down a super Sonic missile

So tell me the concept of deploying IR and Active seekers on missiles.. you seems to be expert... I'm not.... Let's hear it from Mr.X looking professor

You have just faces saving nothing else it uses tech from s300 and US some tech from patriot like track via missile can you copy blah blah blah-8 and first make your out of this universe cowpiss vedic 100000000 gen tej@$$ make your indigenous product kid and first 5 versions of HQ-9 is already operational kid if you have a butthurt use burnol kid its a pain killer kid you guys always lives in delusions you brain fart @$@rJen

So lol when a kid can't answer he goes around.... It's ironic... Did you really think adding some smiles to your rant will make any difference?? yes operational that doesn't explain why the Chinese need S400...

Any way.. the trade in balance was epic

 

[Ultima Thule]

where did you get your education?!!?

Dumbo.... RAM was developed in the time when Supersonic missiles were not there... Kid... Lol... Your so called advanced HQ9 itself uses active radar homing..... let's tell the Chinese to throw them away

Read the history kid Soviet's/Russian developing supersonic ANTISHIP ship missiles since 60, kid do you about sunburn, ship wreck on oscar class ssgn and Chinese are not claiming their hq-9 as supersonic ANTISHIP missiles interceptor but anti aircraft with a limited ABM CAPABILITIES you stubborn @$@rJen their supersonic ANTISHIP missiles interceptor is FL-3000N you stubborn @$@rJen

 

[Basel]

And HQ-9, HQ-29 (comparable to US SM-3) and YJ-18 is not a threat for IN in Indian ocean

Include YJ-100/12 & AShBMs in that equation too.

http://www.deagel.com/Offensive-Weapons/YJ-100_a002939001.aspx

 

[Ultima Thule]

Who?? You professor told you?!!!
The commander at USN should get a heart attack now by seeing your reply... At 10km for a supersonic missile to get to the target is some seconds... You're going to rely on a point defense to take down a super Sonic missile

So tell me the concept of deploying IR and Active seekers on missiles.. you seems to be expert... I'm not.... Let's hear it from Mr.X looking professor

Look yourself kid what a mission for RAM you stubborn @$@rJen
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RIM-116_Rolling_Airframe_Missile

So lol when a kid can't answer he goes around.... It's ironic... Did you really think adding some smiles to your rant will make any difference?? yes operational that doesn't explain why the Chinese need S400...

And you're not ranting, and then tell me why guys you think that your blah blah blah-8 intercept supersonic ANTISHIP missiles but their hq-16b/fl-3000n can't intercept your out of this universe1000000000 gen ahead from rest of the world BRAHMOUSE you stubborn @$@rJen ever heard a layered sam systems you stubborn @$@rJen

 

[Ultima Thule]

Hey stubborn @$@rJen why you're runing like a chicken give me a answer to my questions may be you don't have a answer for my questions
Gay shupa dupa powa HIND you stubborn @$@rJen

 

[MULUBJA]

Yes i knows that but i am trying to they have both concepts western and Russian they are willing to merge both concepts to develop something new to merge those tech to produce design from scratch think @MULUBJA

CHina can not make new design. If they make, it will be like J20 whose designer was scrapped.

n any china vs india scenario, the top of the line PLA equipment will be used against India.

Which 5th generation plane. Our air marshal said that it is not stealth and we can detect it at a great distance.

Which includes stealth jets, AIP subs, nuclear submarines with remote missile launch, anti ship ballistic missile, latest MBT etc

Those noisy subs were detected from a long long distance and torpedo will be released even before chinese subs could detect anything.

The older equipment is meant for china's weaker neighbours.

Russin expert said that your equipment are of 70 era Russian equipment l;ike noisy nuke subs etc.

In any case, china may not take on indian navy in the indian ocean especially on surface warfare, because its challenging for their logistics capability and a risk to trade.

Chinese surface ships may not even have air cover since J-31 navalised version is not out yet.

I agree

Guess chinese subs will always threaten india

We have world's best equipment to detect most noisy subs of china. We can detect and destroy them whenever we want.

 

[Ultima Thule]

CHina can not make new design. If they make, it will be like J20 whose designer was scrapped.

Why please explain @MULUBJA