Indo-Israeli LR-SAM will challenge Chinese Navy in the Indian Ocean: Chinese Military specialist

[MULUBJA]

And HQ-9, HQ-29 (comparable to US SM-3) and YJ-18 is not a threat for IN in Indian ocean

is not a threat for IN in Indian ocean (?)

 

[Ultima Thule]

Good LRSAM and Brahmos 800 will be two very potent weapons

HQ-9

YJ-18

is much better system than your BRAHMOUSE and BLAH BLAH BLAH -8

 

[MULUBJA]

i am simly saying you that they have better system than yours in the for of HQ-9/26/29 that all i you say you blind @MULUBJA

Ya they have better system and that is why they are buying S400 from Russia. They have fifth generation planes still they buy 4th generation plane from Russia. They have world beating submarines still they are buying 2 submarines from Russia. I agree with you that they have better systems. Whole world know that Hq 9 is better than LRSAM except that chinese expert. We need to educate them. There are many chinese experts here who can educate that chinese scientist why LRSAM is no threat to chinese ships.

 

[MULUBJA]

please explain it why @MULUBJA because IN has a cloaking device that can hide all IN asset from enemy sensors totally invisible/invincible to all enemy weapons and sensors
Gay shupa dupa powa Hind @MULUBJA

Why do you ask me these questions. I already praised the chinese system which are much better than anything in the world. I agree with you. I know that that so called chinese expert has no knowledge of this and that is why he is unnecessarily showing his concern for this missile.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Ya they have better system and that is why they are buying S400 from Russia. They have fifth generation planes still they buy 4th generation plane from Russia. They have world beating submarines still they are buying 2 submarines from Russia. I agree with you that they have better systems. Whole world know that Hq 9 is better than LRSAM except that chinese expert. We need to educate them. There are many chinese experts here who can educate that chinese scientist why LRSAM is no threat to chinese ships.

for trade balance with Russia, how many system they bought just 2 to 3 system of S-400 main AD system remain HQ-9 and its version for China and how many Su--35 is inventory in China just 24 main AD jet is and will be remain J-11, J-10 series, and submarine is bought by China From Russia and what world class expert says it one of the best LRSAM @MULUBJA

 

[MULUBJA]

for trade balance with Russia, how many system they bought just 2 to 3 system of S-400 main AD system remain HQ-9 and its version for China and how many Su--35 is inventory in China just 24 main AD jet is and will be remain J-11, J-10 series, and submarine is bought by China From Russia and what world class expert says it one of the best LRSAM @MULUBJA

We both agree on chinese superiority of weapons. What this unnecessary discussion? HQ 9 is a great system (Which is rejected by Turkey). I agree with you.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Why do you ask me these questions. I already praised the chinese system which are much better than anything in the world. I agree with you. I know that that so called chinese expert has no knowledge of this and that is why he is unnecessarily showing his concern for this missile.

Not better but Comparable to S-300, PAC-3, SM-3 he is not spoken person for Chinese armed forces, he just arguing his random thought @MULUBJA

 

[MULUBJA]

HQ-9
View attachment 451539 View attachment 451541
YJ-18
View attachment 451544
is much better system than your BRAHMOUSE and BLAH BLAH BLAH -8

Yes I agree. Chinese systems are always best (Atleast on PDF)

 

[Ultima Thule]

We both agree on chinese superiority of weapons. What this unnecessary discussion? HQ 9 is a great system (Which is rejected by Turkey). I agree with you.

because of US EU pressure not concern over the capabilities of HQ-9 read the history first @MULUBJA

 

[MULUBJA]

Comparable to S-300, PAC-3, SM-3

Ohhh is it? S 300 can shoot down a flying object (Planes primarily and not missile) at 300 km. What is the range of HQ9?

PAC has shotdown many incoming missiles in gulf war. HQ 9? Hq 9 is not even considered a BMD system. Do you know that?

because of US EU pressure not concern over the capabilities of HQ-9 read the history first @MULUBJA

Ohhhhhh is it? They cancelled Chinese system under EU pressure and they are now buying Russian one. Great logic.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Yes I agree. Chinese systems are always best (Atleast on PDF)

And Indian system is out of this universe 100000000000 gen ahead from rest of the world like RAFALE, FGFA, and Tej@$$and now LRSAM @MULUBJA

 

[MULUBJA]

And Indian system is out of this universe 100000000000 gen ahead from rest of the world like RAFALE, FGFA, and Tej@$$and now LRSAM @MULUBJA

We do not claim that. If you believe that, i thank you for that.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Ohhhhhh is it? They cancelled Chinese system under EU pressure and they are now buying Russian one. Great logic.

Remember dude, turkey is a nato member and nato and US has a arm embargo on China, which you can't sell and purchase arm to/from china think @MULUBJA

Ohhh is it? S 300 can shoot down a flying object (Planes primarily and not missile) at 300 km. What is the range of HQ9?

PAC has shotdown many incoming missiles in gulf war. HQ 9? Hq 9 is not even considered a BMD system. Do you know that?

Both have limited anti BM capability against short range BM, HQ-9 range is 200-250 KM

We do not claim that. If you believe that, i thank you for that.

that shows your mentality of 4 year old kid you're the biggest arms importer of the world and why you guys always think that your import weapons is better than manufacturing country weapons, its alway sell you slighty degraed weapons to importers think @MULUBJA

 

[MULUBJA]

Remember dude, turkey is a nato member and nato and US has a arm embargo on China, which you can't sell and purchase arm to/from china think @MULUBJA

I asked you a simple question. They can not buy it from china but can they buy from Russia?

that shows your mentality of 4 year old kid you're the biggest arms importer of the world and why you guys always think that your import weapons is better than manufacturing country weapons, its alway sell you slighty degraed weapons to importers think @MULUBJA

Not only we believe they are better but others also believe. We can buy weapons from US, Russia, France, UK or any other country which produces weapons. We do not have the restriction like china or pakistan so we shall buy only the best. Now suppose we buy S 400 form russia. If it is not good than why china bought it inspite of having Hq9? Why china bought Su 30 and Su 35 in spite of having 5th generation plane (So called)? You problem is that when you or CHina buys something, it is great. When India buys it, it is bad. When Pakistan bought T80, it was most lethal tank but when India bought T90, it was an ordinary tank.

 

[MimophantSlayer]

Barak 8 Interception.