What's new

India's violation of IWT would set a dangerous precedent: Aizaz

When did pakistan bombed KPK ? Any evidence or its usual indian varbel diarrhea
North waziristan

No PR145/2014-ISPR Dated: June 25, 2014
Rawalpindi - June 25, 2014:
UPDATE ZARB-E-AZB
25 June 24, 2014


  1. 5 x Terrorist’s hideouts were destroyed by PAF jet aircrafts this afternoon around Mirali killing 13 x terrorists.
  2. 12 x Terrorists surrendered to security forces in North Waziristan Agency.
-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-
 
.
North waziristan

No PR145/2014-ISPR Dated: June 25, 2014
Rawalpindi - June 25, 2014:
UPDATE ZARB-E-AZB
25 June 24, 2014


  1. 5 x Terrorist’s hideouts were destroyed by PAF jet aircrafts this afternoon around Mirali killing 13 x terrorists.
  2. 12 x Terrorists surrendered to security forces in North Waziristan Agency.
-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-
These areas were evacuated before start of zarb-e-azb...:o::o:though it is stupid to argue with an indian :o::o::o:
 
.
North waziristan

No PR145/2014-ISPR Dated: June 25, 2014
Rawalpindi - June 25, 2014:
UPDATE ZARB-E-AZB
25 June 24, 2014


  1. 5 x Terrorist’s hideouts were destroyed by PAF jet aircrafts this afternoon around Mirali killing 13 x terrorists.
  2. 12 x Terrorists surrendered to security forces in North Waziristan Agency.
-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-

my dear fata is not inclusive in KPK its tribal area which u are talking about now reply me again where did paf bombed kpk ?
 
.
high time scrap a treaty,what ever we give should be a reward for something and not as someones birth right..scrap it or renegotiate it.we are 7 times bigger nation and get our share accordingly...water should be for everyone.
 
.
Some would argue that sending terrorists across LOC was also equivalent to 'setting a dangerous precedent' which has now lead India to retaliate

Lol, If India breaches the water treaty, it will lose Kashmir. It is no laughing matter, a war will ensue that will change the map of India and crush the cow piss drinkers and their poodles once and for all.
 
.
Our water is for our people first , cry you want old man
 
.
Lol, If India breaches the water treaty, it will lose Kashmir. It is no laughing matter, a war will ensue that will change the map of India and crush the cow piss drinkers and their poodles once and for all.

The smaller power threatening the bigger power, strange??? Yes of course the map will change in case of war, maps have been changed in previous wars too, guess which way?
 
Last edited:
.
Foreign Secretary Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry said India's violation of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) would set a dangerous precedent for other countries to behave similarly, but remained hopeful that India would refrain from such actions.

"Contravention of the treaty or its unilateral abrogation by India will not only violate the IWT, but also set a precedent providing other countries a possible justification to undertake similar actions," Chaudhry said while speaking to Russian news agency Sputnik.

The IWT was signed in 1960 and allocated the three eastern rivers of the Indus basin — the Ravi, Beas and Sutlej — to India, while 80 per cent of the three western ones — the Indus, Jhelum and Chenab — were allotted to Pakistan.

It was reported earlier this week that India is stepping up efforts to maximise its use of the western rivers of the Indus basin, a move that involves building large storage facilities and canals.

India has maintained that it has not fully utilised its 20pc share of the Indus waters and that the proposed water projects would not be in violation of the treaty. Pakistan has disputed these claims.

Chaudhry said that issues such as extremism have damaged the relationship between India and Pakistan. He reiterated the need for both countries to hold bilateral talks focused on these important issues.

“Relations between Pakistan and India have not been very good and the reason is that Pakistan and India are not having any dialogue," he said.

He added that lack of such dialogue had allowed the relationship between the two countries to deteriorate.

"We also believe that it is for the [best for] our two counties to sit at the table and share each other's perspectives,” Chaudhry said.

However, he added that the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), a group dominated by Russia and China, was not the correct platform to hold bilateral dialogue.

Pakistan and India's full membership to the powerful SCO was approved by its Council of Heads of State at its 15th Summit last year. In July, Pakistan signed the Memorandum of Obligations (MoO) with the objective of obtaining full membership of the organisation.

Chaudhry described the SCO as "a good forum to work for maintenance of regional peace, security and stability, economy and trade."

UN's role in Kashmir
Chaudhry said the role of the UN Monitoring Observer Group in India and Pakistan was critical to peace between Pakistan and India.

"The Group can also independently monitor ceasefire violations," Chaudhry said, alleging that India had violated the ceasefire agreement 310 times since September.

He said the international community, too, should play its role in ensuring that India respects its international obligations and commitments.

http://www.dawn.com/news/1304964/indias-violation-of-iwt-would-set-a-dangerous-precedent-aizaz

@war&peace @Khafee @SherDil007 @I S I

Pakistan should be aware that India is one of the few states that has respected riparian rights of downstream states, Even your friends like China and Turkey do not
 
.
Some would argue that sending terrorists across LOC was also equivalent to 'setting a dangerous precedent' which has now lead India to retaliate

Exactly!

Pakistanis didn't think about setting a "dangerous precedent" when they occupied Kargil heights and enforced war that killed thousands, or when Pakistanis attacked Indian Parliament itself or when Pakistanis killed hundreds of innocent civilians in Mumbai.

But when India, believing in age-old tradition of nonviolence, tries to 'right' the historic wrongs of IWT in a non-violent way, suddenly there is risk of setting a "dangerous precedent"?

So Pakistanis will decide what will set a "dangerous precedent"?
 
.
But then some would also argue that Killing and blinding kashmiris was also equivalent to 'setting a dangerous precedent' which has now lead mujahideen to retaliate.

That was setting a "powerful precedent" which rings bells deep down the guts of terrorists.
No innocent civilian was hurt. Only the pigs which came to streets and threw stones and bottles were taught a lesson.
Now for those who got blinded by pellet guns it will set a powerful reminder till his third generation on consequences of sedition against an elected government.

Lol, If India breaches the water treaty, it will lose Kashmir. It is no laughing matter, a war will ensue that will change the map of India and crush the cow piss drinkers and their poodles once and for all.

No BS.
Pakistan will implode in the ensuing water crisis.
Clean work without spending a bullet.
 
.
I've been asking this Q for long but no one has been able to reply so far.

Can ANYONE name one treaty/agreement (except IWT, obviously) in the whole wide world that gives 80% of the water to the lower riparian?

IWT is dead. The GoI has decided. The execution will probably take a decade or so. Pakistanis (the Pakistani Army) should now make peace with the folks who give it water. No shame in it.
 
.
Some would argue that sending terrorists across LOC was also equivalent to 'setting a dangerous precedent' which has now lead India to retaliate
Stop sending your rats from Afghanistan WE know the ugly face of your so don't act like saint.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom