What's new

India's shameful kowtowing to china.

Shabz Nist

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
744
Reaction score
1
Country
India
Location
Belgium
Mihir S Sharma: Our shameful kowtow
Mihir S Sharma / Mar 31, 2012, 00:18 IST

The awe-inspiring leadership of the People’s Republic of China probably doesn’t concern itself much about public opinion among those people not fortunate enough to be born Chinese. But they certainly scored a pretty impressive own-goal during the BRICS summit in New Delhi last week, efficiently aided by India’s timorous leadership. It isn’t just that the Chinese delegation at the Oberoi ate all the mutton chops at the lunch buffet (true) or that they shut off all traffic around Khan market at lunchtime (also true) — although a power that carelessly antagonises Lutyens’ Delhi lunchers is unwisely overconfident.

It was, of course, what millions of Delhiites saw that will have turned them off China-sympathy: Tibetans being rounded up, made to squat in the sun; the ever-sensitive Delhi Police indulging in the worst sort of racial profiling, demanding that people who look even vaguely Tibetan prove their credentials or be locked up. People of Manipuri descent wondered why they left home without their passports. Those living in dozens of Tibetan-dominated areas were cordoned off from the rest of the city like Palestinians on the West Bank. The Tibetan poet, Tenzin Tsundue, was bundled offstage by the cops after an academic discussion at the India Habitat Centre, and sent to Tihar.

Was there, perhaps, an even minimally credible threat to the life of Our Glorious Leader, Hu Jintao? No. Because the Tibetan movement has always been resolutely non-violent. Indeed, that has been India’s price for the grudging asylum we have provided them. In spite of that, the Chinese government had the gall to issue a statement thanking India for cracking down on Tibetans and finally recognising the “troubles” that they present. Given that any real law-and-order threat only exists in the deceitful newspeak of a totalitarian party, why has India’s craven government undermined its pretensions to democracy – and its only real argument for running a better state than China’s – by beating up and jailing its own, non-violent citizens?

Because heaven forfend the Chinese dictator see a Tibetan flag hanging limply somewhere. Man! It would be 1962 all over again. As it is, he almost had an aneurysm when watching the original cut of “Sadda Haq” from Rockstar. Thank heavens the Censor Board prevented an all-fronts invasion that time by forcing the blurring of “Free Tibet” posters in the video.

The Indian government cannot afford people to start looking more closely at its continued kowtowing to China. (Kowtow: verb, meaning to kneel and touch the ground with the forehead in submission, as to the Chinese emperor.) It should fear its citizens waking up to this, because far too much of its foreign policy is predicated on placating the Chinese. This comes about because of an odd political coalition between a government and prime minister too eager to crash a “world stage” without any apparent understanding of what global power entails; and an elite that is capable of any sort of intellectual dishonesty in the service of an ingrained anti-Americanism.

Consider the organisation that caused New Delhi to be graced by the presence of President Hu. (And three other leaders, none of which expected people to be rounded up as sacrifices to herald their arrival.) India preferred the India-Brazil-South Africa (IBSA) grouping, but because the Chinese and the Russians wanted a forum in which they could denounce the West, India assented to the BRICS idea. For India’s leaders, the more summits they have to prepare for, the better. No matter that the BRICS have nothing whatsoever in common, and have spectacularly failed in any sort of international coordination.

India has gone further, helping to derail climate-change talks by allowing itself to be bracketed with China in the world’s eyes, although China pollutes much more per capita than India does. It has stood with China at trade talks in spite of the fact that China is the world’s worst trade offender and, it has been persuasively argued, is dumping goods in India that could destroy our manufacturing base. But it doesn’t matter; international photo-ops are what matter on Raisina Hill, a reminder to our restive population that its unpopular government is so beloved in the chancelleries of the world. Dr Singh and Mr Krishna need a reminder perhaps: Beijing doesn’t have a vote in India — except one or two indirectly, one surmises, in the Rajya Sabha.

India’s government has been allowed to get away with this because it has not been held to account. This is because some of India’s best policy minds are in thrall to the idea that India must, of necessity, benefit most in a world in which China has greater power. Why? Because, in their confused notion of how global power equations work, that means that America has less. And America, as we all know, is Bad. It persecutes Muslims — no mention of Xinjiang, please, and so what if Barack Obama thankfully didn’t expect Indians who looked Muslim to be locked up when he arrived in town. (Can you imagine the articulate protests from our now-silent “independent thinkers” if he had?)

This policy elite is firmly convinced that India has a moral imperative and historic destiny to help balance the scales against American power. If America is Bad, and China the only real challenger in sight, then a government suspected of not hating America enough will go unquestioned when it bends over backward to please China’s leaders. Position papers will argue for “rebalancing” and such. But don’t get fooled: it’s just another word for kowtowing.

Mihir S Sharma: Our shameful kowtow


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Its really discouraging to see our present government bending over backwards to appease everyone. My only hope is that our establishment has some actual strategy in place when all this hits the fan. That being said, i am appreciative of our efforts in Afghanistan, Tajikistan, African continent and in international forums to improve India's image.
 
. . .
Mihir S Sharma: Our shameful kowtow
Mihir S Sharma / Mar 31, 2012, 00:18 IST

The awe-inspiring leadership of the People’s Republic of China probably doesn’t concern itself much about public opinion among those people not fortunate enough to be born Chinese. But they certainly scored a pretty impressive own-goal during the BRICS summit in New Delhi last week, efficiently aided by India’s timorous leadership. It isn’t just that the Chinese delegation at the Oberoi ate all the mutton chops at the lunch buffet (true) or that they shut off all traffic around Khan market at lunchtime (also true) — although a power that carelessly antagonises Lutyens’ Delhi lunchers is unwisely overconfident.

It was, of course, what millions of Delhiites saw that will have turned them off China-sympathy: Tibetans being rounded up, made to squat in the sun; the ever-sensitive Delhi Police indulging in the worst sort of racial profiling, demanding that people who look even vaguely Tibetan prove their credentials or be locked up. People of Manipuri descent wondered why they left home without their passports. Those living in dozens of Tibetan-dominated areas were cordoned off from the rest of the city like Palestinians on the West Bank. The Tibetan poet, Tenzin Tsundue, was bundled offstage by the cops after an academic discussion at the India Habitat Centre, and sent to Tihar.

Was there, perhaps, an even minimally credible threat to the life of Our Glorious Leader, Hu Jintao? No. Because the Tibetan movement has always been resolutely non-violent. Indeed, that has been India’s price for the grudging asylum we have provided them. In spite of that, the Chinese government had the gall to issue a statement thanking India for cracking down on Tibetans and finally recognising the “troubles” that they present. Given that any real law-and-order threat only exists in the deceitful newspeak of a totalitarian party, why has India’s craven government undermined its pretensions to democracy – and its only real argument for running a better state than China’s – by beating up and jailing its own, non-violent citizens?

Because heaven forfend the Chinese dictator see a Tibetan flag hanging limply somewhere. Man! It would be 1962 all over again. As it is, he almost had an aneurysm when watching the original cut of “Sadda Haq” from Rockstar. Thank heavens the Censor Board prevented an all-fronts invasion that time by forcing the blurring of “Free Tibet” posters in the video.

The Indian government cannot afford people to start looking more closely at its continued kowtowing to China. (Kowtow: verb, meaning to kneel and touch the ground with the forehead in submission, as to the Chinese emperor.) It should fear its citizens waking up to this, because far too much of its foreign policy is predicated on placating the Chinese. This comes about because of an odd political coalition between a government and prime minister too eager to crash a “world stage” without any apparent understanding of what global power entails; and an elite that is capable of any sort of intellectual dishonesty in the service of an ingrained anti-Americanism.

Consider the organisation that caused New Delhi to be graced by the presence of President Hu. (And three other leaders, none of which expected people to be rounded up as sacrifices to herald their arrival.) India preferred the India-Brazil-South Africa (IBSA) grouping, but because the Chinese and the Russians wanted a forum in which they could denounce the West, India assented to the BRICS idea. For India’s leaders, the more summits they have to prepare for, the better. No matter that the BRICS have nothing whatsoever in common, and have spectacularly failed in any sort of international coordination.

India has gone further, helping to derail climate-change talks by allowing itself to be bracketed with China in the world’s eyes, although China pollutes much more per capita than India does. It has stood with China at trade talks in spite of the fact that China is the world’s worst trade offender and, it has been persuasively argued, is dumping goods in India that could destroy our manufacturing base. But it doesn’t matter; international photo-ops are what matter on Raisina Hill, a reminder to our restive population that its unpopular government is so beloved in the chancelleries of the world. Dr Singh and Mr Krishna need a reminder perhaps: Beijing doesn’t have a vote in India — except one or two indirectly, one surmises, in the Rajya Sabha.

India’s government has been allowed to get away with this because it has not been held to account. This is because some of India’s best policy minds are in thrall to the idea that India must, of necessity, benefit most in a world in which China has greater power. Why? Because, in their confused notion of how global power equations work, that means that America has less. And America, as we all know, is Bad. It persecutes Muslims — no mention of Xinjiang, please, and so what if Barack Obama thankfully didn’t expect Indians who looked Muslim to be locked up when he arrived in town. (Can you imagine the articulate protests from our now-silent “independent thinkers” if he had?)

This policy elite is firmly convinced that India has a moral imperative and historic destiny to help balance the scales against American power. If America is Bad, and China the only real challenger in sight, then a government suspected of not hating America enough will go unquestioned when it bends over backward to please China’s leaders. Position papers will argue for “rebalancing” and such. But don’t get fooled: it’s just another word for kowtowing.

Mihir S Sharma: Our shameful kowtow


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Its really discouraging to see our present government bending over backwards to appease everyone. My only hope is that our establishment has some actual strategy in place when all this hits the fan. That being said, i am appreciative of our efforts in Afghanistan, Tajikistan, African continent and in international forums to improve India's image.


Kowtowing ? with due respect Sir, it is called "making peace with an Adversary".
 
. .
To be honest i am with the people of Tibet. I even support a free and Independent Tibet within China where they are free to do what ever they want.

Free Tibet :cheers:

I think the ppl of China should voice the concerns of Tibetans and give them their freedom. Let there be one China but give them their freedom.

Let them be happy now and one day they themselves will be proud to be a part of China.

free-tibet-map.jpg
 
.
We welcome India's rise as a responsible stakeholder in the international system.

China is controlled by a communist regime with state policy of repression and curbing of public freedom. How do you suppose a democratic entity like India would ever find common ground with a dissimilar entity like China ?

Kowtowing ? with due respect Sir, it is called "making peace with an Adversary".

Peace is good. But letting go of genuine national interest is not the right way to go about it. The current government with its policy of appeasement no longer enjoys public support. I await eagerly for a new administration to take charge.
 
.
China is controlled by a communist regime with state policy of repression and curbing of public freedom. How do you suppose a democratic entity like India would ever find common ground with a dissimilar entity like China ?



Peace is good. But letting go of genuine national interest is not the right way to go about it. The current government with its policy of appeasement no longer enjoys public support. I await eagerly for a new administration to take charge.

India is controlled by a monarchy that starves its people in a mad North Korea style quest to gain "military parity" with a country 5 times larger in economy and 30% larger in population. Bringing politics into this topic never helps you. It just makes you look stupid.
 
.
India is controlled by a monarchy that starves its people in a mad North Korea style quest to gain "military parity" with a country 5 times larger in economy and 30% larger in population. Bringing politics into this topic never helps you. It just makes you look stupid.

I'm sorry if my post came across as flame-bait. However, can you ever deny that your government is a communist regime ? Can you deny that restriction on public media exists ? Can you also deny that open criticism of ruling party is strongly discouraged and often shut down violently ? The list really is endless. India; even considering its galaxy of flaws; still allows its citizens to carve out their own future and have a say in the administration. Or even criticize it, if one so wishes. Also, I am amused that you think India is controlled by a "monarchy". I would be much obliged if you would enlighten us about this "monarchy".
 
.
I'm sorry if my post came across as flame-bait. However, can you ever deny that your government is a communist regime ? Can you deny that restriction on public media exists ? Can you also deny that open criticism of ruling party is strongly discouraged and often shut down violently ? The list really is endless. India; even considering its galaxy of flaws; still allows its citizens to carve out their own future and have a say in the administration. Or even criticize it, if one so wishes. Also, I am amused that you think India is controlled by a "monarchy". I would be much obliged if you would enlighten us about this "monarchy".

How many blood related leaders of India were there? How many blood related leaders of China were there? Thanks.
 
.
How many blood related leaders of India were there? How many blood related leaders of China were there? Thanks.
If you are saying PMs

Nehru-Indira-Rajiv. 3 in 65 years
In states it's roller coaster. Everybody has atleast a turn. Yes there are dynasties in Indian politics but that's not only leadership in India. But it's too high to call it monarcy. They belong to the party which fabricated the Indian struggle Movement. Indians are patient people plus they don't have that capable party who can handle the country right now. It's more of respect than monarcy. It was proven to Mrs. Indira Gandhi in emergency.

And there are many example of people getting out of power for miss using it. Top from PM to low to corporaters. NOT scoring point but this can't be done in China
 
. .
It was, of course, what millions of Delhiites saw that will have turned them off China-sympathy: Tibetans being rounded up, made to squat in the sun; the ever-sensitive Delhi Police indulging in the worst sort of racial profiling, demanding that people who look even vaguely Tibetan prove their credentials or be locked up. People of Manipuri descent wondered why they left home without their passports. Those living in dozens of Tibetan-dominated areas were cordoned off from the rest of the city like Palestinians on the West Bank. The Tibetan poet, Tenzin Tsundue, was bundled offstage by the cops after an academic discussion at the India Habitat Centre, and sent to Tihar.

This is like a slap in the face of Mr Dilemia...He sure knows that Indian sympathy towards him and his followers is for India's own confidence crisis vis a vis China. And I assume he sure knows one day, he and his followers will be thrown out like a garbage they are when India does not see them as potential bargaining chips anymore or they become determinable to India's own national interests.
 
.
This is like a slap in the face of Mr Dilemia...He sure knows that Indian sympathy towards him and his followers is for India's own confidence crisis vis a vis China. And I assume he sure knows one day, he and his followers will be thrown out like a garbage they are when India does not see them as potential bargaining chips anymore or they become determinable to India's own national interests.

Well there comes the advantage with democracy....you simply cannot go against the people..or else be ready to loose the power...belive if that happens the ruling Govt wont last...this is nopt a communist dictatorship that only Govt decides whom to throw out and what to do.
 
.
This is like a slap in the face of Mr Dilemia...He sure knows that Indian sympathy towards him and his followers is for India's own confidence crisis vis a vis China. And I assume he sure knows one day, he and his followers will be thrown out like a garbage they are when India does not see them as potential bargaining chips anymore or they become determinable to India's own national interests.

That is idiotic to be used. what if we "Throw" Kashmiries away and take everything. Just because Tibetans doesnt have an army doesnt mean that they have no human rights.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom