What's new

India’s Rs 1.2 lakh crore nuclear submarine project closer to realisation

BL33D

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jul 4, 2019
Messages
1,491
Reaction score
-3
Country
India
Location
India
Ins_S62-1600x900.jpg


India is taking a crucial step for its Rs 1.2 lakh crore project to produce future nuclear-powered submarines, with top levels of the government processing clearances for the detailed design phase.

The plan to build six advanced attack submarines — to be nuclear powered but armed with conventional missiles and torpedoes — is being monitored closely and the first of the boats could roll out in a decade if things go as per plan.

Sources told ET that the initial design phase for the new boats has progressed successfully and more resources will now be deployed to move to the more complex detailed design and construction — to be undertaken by the Directorate of Naval Design (Submarine Design Group) with assistance from the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO).

sda.jpg


The timing of the critical clearances coincides with the pace of current work at the Ship Building Centre (SBC) in Visakhapatnam, where the Arihant class of nucleararmed submarines are being built. Major structural work on the fourth of the class is nearing completion and the centre would be able to take on work for the next generation of vessels as early as next year, if need be. Though this is unlikely as the developmental phase will take longer.

Sources said the second of the Arihant class — the slightly bigger and better-armed INS Arighat — is expected to be commissioned this year, adding teeth to India’s nuclear deterrence. Two follow-on boats after that are likely to enter service before 2024.

This would leave SBC with adequate space and resources to commence building the next generation of nuclear-attack submarines. While the Arihant project took over two decades to fructify, the next generation submarines are likely to progress at half the given time as adequate experience is now available, both in terms of design and construction of nuclear submarines.

As reported by ET, work on the submarine project gained pace last year with a defence public sector unit working on a special metal alloy for the hull and testing of a scale model as part of the design process. The plan to build six nuclear-powered attack submarines (SSNs) kicked off in 2015 when the NDA government gave a go ahead to a long-pending project for the Indian Navy.

India and Russia have also signed a $3 billion deal to lease an advanced nuclear attack submarine that will be fitted with indigenous communication systems and sensors. This submarine will fill in the gap and will be used for crew training before the indigenous boats are pressed into service.

Nuclear attack submarines — powered by a nuclear reactor but armed with conventional weapons — will give India a significant strike and area denial capability in the region. These vessels can remain underwater for months, making them almost impossible to detect and are a big deterrence for enemy vessels. The US Navy operates over 55 nuclear attack submarines. China has at least 10 in service and is rapidly expanding the fleet, including deployments in the Indian Ocean and several port calls to neighbouring nations.

The project will enter India to a select league of five nations that have such a capability. The last country to enter this club was China in 1974 with its Han class boats. Details are not known but a new, more powerful nuclear reactor is being designed for the programme as well by the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. The INS Arihant and Chakra (on lease from Russia) are the two nuclear-powered submarines currently in service with the navy.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...loser-to-realisation/articleshow/74234776.cms
 
What are the expected armament of these six submarines? I know tge article mentioned torpedos and conventional missiles. But which missiles and in what quantity.
No idea yet. Will update if I find something on it.
 
Why article is mentioned conventional missiles? Aren't our K series missiles nuclear? Maybe they don't want to mention word nuclear.....
Anyway great news.... IMHO we should scrap P75I and concentrate totally on homemade nuclear submarines..... Like UK, USA and France I believe our submarines fleet should be totally a nuclear submarine fleet.... No need for diesel SSK...
 
Why article is mentioned conventional missiles? Aren't our K series missiles nuclear? Maybe they don't want to mention word nuclear.....
Anyway great news.... IMHO we should scrap P75I and concentrate totally on homemade nuclear submarines..... Like UK, USA and France I believe our submarines fleet should be totally a nuclear submarine fleet.... No need for diesel SSK...

No more Aircraft carriers... IN to invest heavily on Submarines...
 
Look, I don't know what they have or not. But there are somethings in life which are below stupid. Forgetting to close hatch of a 1+ billion dollar boat while it dives is WAY up that list.
Do you really thing the incident was as simple as closing a hatch and no other complexities involved and you think such incidents dont happen elsewhere?

Why article is mentioned conventional missiles? Aren't our K series missiles nuclear? Maybe they don't want to mention word nuclear.....
Anyway great news.... IMHO we should scrap P75I and concentrate totally on homemade nuclear submarines..... Like UK, USA and France I believe our submarines fleet should be totally a nuclear submarine fleet.... No need for diesel SSK...
Because these are fast attack SSNs and they are used in targetting SSBNs, Aircraft Carrier Groups and other Naval Ships, So they need good torpedoes and short range missiles. The job of an SSN and SSBN are quite different.
 
Do you really thing the incident was as simple as closing a hatch and no other complexities involved and you think such incidents dont happen elsewhere?
When you are making a SSBN, you need to make sure that it does remain dry inside. Closing hatch irrespective of all the other complexity goes a long way ---I cann't believe I am explaining this. And in 2015 or so, this should not be an excuse at all.
 
When you are making a SSBN, you need to make sure that it does remain dry inside. Closing hatch irrespective of all the other complexity goes a long way ---I cann't believe I am explaining this. And in 2015 or so, this should not be an excuse at all.
I didnt know. Thanks for taking time to explain.
 
What are the expected armament of these six submarines? I know tge article mentioned torpedos and conventional missiles. But which missiles and in what quantity.
This is not a land attack submarine but ship attack submarine. So, the armament will be according to that requirement.

India will use Torpedoes and missiles like Brahmos and Nirbhay variant cruise missile to take out ships

Why article is mentioned conventional missiles? Aren't our K series missiles nuclear? Maybe they don't want to mention word nuclear.....
Anyway great news.... IMHO we should scrap P75I and concentrate totally on homemade nuclear submarines..... Like UK, USA and France I believe our submarines fleet should be totally a nuclear submarine fleet.... No need for diesel SSK...
We will have submarines to attack enemy ships and enemy submarines. We don't need nuclear warhead to take out enemy ships. Brahmos can penetrate any ship and disable it. Slower missiles like cruise missiles are unfit for nuclear warhead as they are too easy to intercept and we don't want to waste nuclear warheads. Also, nuclear torpedoes can be a serious problem if it detonates close to friendly submarine or ship as the shockwave created in water can damage the friendly submarine even it is at 1km distance from the enemy ship which was struck. We can use nuclear tipped missiles on SSN but it is not needed as these nuclear warheads are mainly to attack land sites and not smaller targets like ships.

No more Aircraft carriers... IN to invest heavily on Submarines...
Who said that? India will invest in all types of equipment- aircraft carrier and submarines. One is not at the expense of other. As India gets more technology, funds will also increase for defence. As if now, funds are low because India imports many items. When things become indigenous, the money will only circulate inside India and hence more funds to defence will only help in increasing GDP.

When you are making a SSBN, you need to make sure that it does remain dry inside. Closing hatch irrespective of all the other complexity goes a long way ---I cann't believe I am explaining this. And in 2015 or so, this should not be an excuse at all.
What nonsense. Do you think that it was a real news? Who verified it? Good luck thinking that India actually left the hatch open. What if it was a distraction to hide another submarine which India was making - Aridhaman? INS Aridhaman was being stated as 2nd submarine but suddenly it became Arighat. There is no news of Aridhaman at all. So, there is a chance that India is having more submarine that what it claims.
 
What nonsense. Do you think that it was a real news? Who verified it? Good luck thinking that India actually left the hatch open. What if it was a distraction to hide another submarine which India was making - Aridhaman? INS Aridhaman was being stated as 2nd submarine but suddenly it became Arighat. There is no news of Aridhaman at all. So, there is a chance that India is having more submarine that what it claims.
A number of major Indian media sources reported this incidence. I mean if you hear NY Times saying that USA had its missile arming code set to all 0s for 2 decades and you don't hear a refutation from US government you will believe it, right? I am yet to see a refutation of this by Indian government or navy.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom