Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You do know that ANTRIX which markets launch capabilities of ISRO actually makes profit, don't you?On the other hand, Pakistan didn't waste their talent on 27 useless papers or $70M on a orbiter but rather invested the talent, time and money into some other useful projects.
You do know that ANTRIX which markets launch capabilities of ISRO actually makes profit, don't you?
Even if I put 70 million dollars as their marketing budget, they are still net positive at 45 million dollars profit.
By the numbers, ISRO has done way more than most of the Indian departments.
Why not?$45M profit for launching a $70M orbiter? Show me the math please....with a source. It's hard to believe someone on PDF without a source.
Why not?
https://www.antrix.co.in/sites/default/files/Annual report 2018-19.pdf (Page 36) Profit of INR 26552.86 Lakh (After taxes)
https://www.antrix.co.in/sites/default/files/ar-2017-18-eng_0.pdf Page 29. Profit of INR 21,152.00 Lakh (After taxes).
You do know that ANTRIX which markets launch capabilities of ISRO actually makes profit, don't you?
Even if I put 70 million dollars as their marketing budget, they are still net positive at 45 million dollars profit.
By the numbers, ISRO has done way more than most of the Indian departments.
BTW, Arianspace, the commerical arm of ESA, earns a profit or mere 4 million euros at a budget of 1.43 billion euros. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arianespace
Just to put the things in prospective.
Well, if making Euro 4 MILLION on a budget of 1.5 BILLION is not absurd, then India is doing A-Okay.Because making a $45M just for launching a $70M orbiter is absurd....
Let me show you how below.
I did not quote wiki, I have annual report from Antrix itself.As you can see....someone increased the number from 28.7 to 30 so who knows if wiki can be trusted....always have to look at the source.
Well, if making Euro 4 MILLION on a budget of 1.5 BILLION is not absurd, then India is doing A-Okay.
I did not quote wiki, I have annual report from Antrix itself.
You do know that ANTRIX which markets launch capabilities of ISRO actually makes profit, don't you?
Even if I put 70 million dollars as their marketing budget, they are still net positive at 45 million dollars profit.
By the numbers, ISRO has done way more than most of the Indian departments.
Then in that case first ask europeans to close their "low profitable" Anianespace before pointing finger at Antrix and Indian space program.Again...you're looking at the profit of one single unicorn company in a pile of unprofitable ones......on the other hand, many European ventures make profit, albeit lesser if seen individually.
Gotta look at the bigger picture...
If entity is owned by government, as you said yourself, then entire income is government's. Meaning Tax + Profit After Tax goes in government's kitty. Its just being accounted under two heads (Tax and Profit After Tax).So where did the below "45 million dollars" reference come from written by you on this thread?
I can only find the $45M "operating income", not profit, figure on wiki...
Then in that case first ask europeans to close their "low profitable" Anianespace before pointing finger at Antrix and Indian space program.
Besides, Lets see. Antrix is making 41000 Lakhs on a revenue of 170901.62 Lakhs. Thats 24% profit. I don't know about you, but I consider 24% profit a pretty good return.
As a comparison, Amazon brings 14.5 billion operating income on a revenue of $ 280.5 billion.
If entity is owned by government, as you said yourself, then entire income is government's. Meaning Tax + Profit After Tax goes in government's kitty. Its just being accounted under two heads (Tax and Profit After Tax).
So total income for government is around 41K lakh INR.
@Itachi Since we are talking profit and loss, lets look at the profits of commercial arm of SUPARO, if there is one. Care to compare?
Lets see, which is better, a sea of all non profitable companies and a sea of non profitable company and few unicorns? Why shoot unicorn because other are non profitable?I see you still didn't get what I was alluding to.......one highly profitable company in a sea of profit eating ones versus a sea of low profitable companies, which would you choose?
Care to quote any mind boggling achievements of SUPARCO?SUPARCO, like NASA, doesn't need to generate a profit.....since it's a govt. owned entity. For a $36M budget...yes, you read that write.....for what it has already achieved is mind boggling since no other govt. has done so much with so little.