anonymus
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2011
- Messages
- 3,870
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
India was not formed on the ideology of hinduism. So the srilankan tamils need not be a hindu to get citizenship.
Neither is India formed on basis of Tamil ideology. Thus we do not have any responsibility towards Sri Lankan Tamils too by this logic.
well, because we claim to be secular, we cant discriminate people based on religion. In any case I was questioning 'liberal' word.
State is neither legally, nor morally bound to treat all asylum seeker/migrants as equal. State ,at least India, is only bound to be secular only when dealing with citizens, with few exceptions like appointing people on religious posts.
And I would be happy to carry a label of Fascist/Nazi/Sanghi/KKK/Whatever is flavor of the day , than given asylum to people who hate me, and as this forum ( I have provided reference and those reference are from this forum only. There are many from other forums too which I would be happy to point out) ,and history (Ahemadis rioted with Sunnis on direct action day, and Jinnah was a Shia muslim) , and current affairs have proved, muslims have very low co-existence tendencies and tolerance potential.
Europe tried to fit a square peg into a circular hole and is learning the lesson in tolerance and co-existence the hard way.