India's fear of Chicken Neck and annexation plan of Nepal and Bhutan

[genmirajborgza786]

Great Comedy.If there is China or US in the place India ,they run a carpet bombing in Dhaka.It is because of India your country can did such cheap tricks .But that also not granted .We also have another face .If we can free 90000 sq.km area from Pakistan ,we can also teach some lessons the occupants in that area.
All Indians know about their soft leadership.They dont interfere in others matter.But dont play games with our national security.
Lots of terrorists are infiltrated through BD border to India and Indian security agencies nabbed a lot of them.We stay away from you if you dont scratch our national security .Otherwise we use all influence in our disposal.Even US dont have a say in that .

On topic: leave this paranoid behaviour.India protect both Nepal and Bhutan from external threat.Nepal and Bhutan are culturally integrated in to our society.We need good neighbours not states.They will remain as our good neighbours .

you took 90,000 sq km from Pakistan ? could you elaborate more on this

 

[BDforever]

you took 90,000 sq km from Pakistan ? could you elaborate more on this

leave it bro, he is in bollywood dream LOL

 

[third eye]

you took 90,000 sq km from Pakistan ? could you elaborate more on this

I think he meant 90000 POWs

 

[Roybot]

Jamatis keep forgetting that they have a chicken neck of their own and it would take India only a few hours to separate Rangpur division from BD to expand the chicken neck if it comes down to that.

Source: @Roybot

Yup annex Rangpur, and unhook CHT, and job is done. But then again Bangladesh is not run but stupid jamaatis, to even try something as daft as this.

 

[Skull and Bones]

Do not think that BD Army does not know tactics. Most BD Army presence is in there, keep it in mind

Bangladeshi resistance?

 

[scorpionx]

Honestly, for the last few years India's Nepal policy has been blunt and in short quite aggressive while the Chinese have adopted a "wait and see" approach concentrating more on economic ties with this small state seeing the enormous Indian influence in its political corridors. Indian attitude to Nepal is very clear. It does not want to lose the only buffer between it and its biggest neighbor in the North.Specifically after 1950, this stance had been visibly rigid and obstinate. It has allowed the Nepalese to use all its ports, free transit passage through its bed let alone the extravagantly Gurkha presence in its army. But in return India's demand is a pro-Indian regime, be it a monarch or a democratically elected government.

I would love to see India changes its aggressive tone of diplomacy to a more silent and milder one using its economic and cultural prowess more to pacify the growing Chinese influence.The longer we remain rigid there is every chance that we lose the public support in this small Himalayan state.

 

[Dandpatta]

Honestly, for the last few years India's Nepal policy has been blunt and in short quite aggressive ...........(cut n snip ) ... I would love to see India changes its aggressive tone of diplomacy to a more silent and milder one using its economic and cultural prowess more to pacify the growing Chinese influence.The longer we remain rigid there is every chance that we lose the public support in this small Himalayan state.

And honestly there is a chunk of Nepalese who have an envious disdain towards Indians. Not as marked as our Lungi-battalion under the (Chicken's) neck, but nevertheless, the disdain came about due to the exploitation of the Nepalese working class when a lot of frugal Marwadis (who already had a base in Calcutta) took up plush opportunities in the sundry trade and industry. A lot of them actually made it possible for a lot of goods from India and elsewhere to be made available in India but in the process, there was a glass ceiling .

I remember when one of my (Indian) friend's uncles had invested in one of the biggest garment factory in Asia (back in the 90s) in Biratnagar (MOMENTO APPARELS) . There was a clear divide between the factory's Indian managerial staff and the factory floor workers.

Fast forward to present day, things have changed a lot for Nepal especially. Young Nepalese are more upwardly mobile, have a larger , wordly view of their own nation and of others and are more assertive of their independence. And I agree, Indian foreign policy towards Nepal needs to be toned in the larger context of their dependence on China as well. Nepal is no more a kid. It has to be given its space to make its own decisions as an INDEPENDENT nation and not as a vassal / agent / annexee / surrogate of any power.

 

[Tractor]

No need to annex a nation in case that its diplomacy under your control.

Nepal you Indian free in and out and Chinese no such right.

 

[INDIC]

Jamatis keep forgetting that they have a chicken neck of their own and it would take India only a few hours to separate Rangpur division from BD to expand the chicken neck if it comes down to that.

Source: @Roybot

You forgot to add this.

 

[Tractor]

Bhutan people our cousin we protect them from Indian annexation.

 

[INDIC]

Bhutan people our cousin we protect them from Indian annexation.

What exactly a Han Chinese share with Bhutanese or any other people of Himalayas?

 

[Tractor]

What exactly a Han Chinese share with Bhutanese or any other people of Himalayas?

Just look into our faces you know that.

And the word tail ese we share..

 

[INDIC]

Just look into our faces you know that.

What it has to do with face. I know your entire history and fake Sino-Tibetan fraternity.

 

[Tractor]

What it has to do with face. I know your entire history and fake Sino-Tibetan fraternity.

Face is everything if you have normal sensation.

 

[INDIC]

Face is everything if you have normal sensation.

What your views about Japanese, Viets, Koreans and Mongol.

BBC News - A Point Of View: How China sees a multicultural world

From the mid-17th Century, large tracts of the western region were conquered by the Qing dynasty in a series of brutal wars. The inhabitants of these lands were not Han. With their different physical appearance, darker skin, distinctive customs and lower level of development, the Han saw them as the Other, as "barbarians".

Not surprisingly, the Chinese government, both imperial and communist, has long had a troubled relationship with parts of the western regions, notably Tibet and Xinjiang.