What's new

India's Demand for Russia to Transfer Tech on PAK FA: Practical or Preposterous?

1050859714.jpg


Sources from the Indian Defense Ministry have told The Times of India that Delhi would participate in the joint development of a new PAK FA-derived fifth gen fighter in cooperation with Russia only if the Russian side included full-scale technology transfer as part of the deal. Russian experts are divided over the implications of this ultimatum.
Only last month, Vladimir Drozhzhov, deputy director of Russia's Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation, the agency charged with regulating military-technical cooperation with other countries, told Sputnik that Russia and India had agreed on a draft contract for the joint development of a new fifth-generation aircraft, the Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA) derived from Russia's Sukhoi T-50 (PAK FA) stealth multirole fighter.

However, on Thursday, the Times of India reported, citing Defense Ministry sources, that Delhi is conditioning the signing of such a deal with Russia on a full-scale transfer of technology, including the fighter's source codes. In addition, the Indian side is demanding that the FGFA project should directly aid a separate program, India's Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) project, as well.

"This is mandatory. A high-level committee headed by an Air Marshal from the Indian Air Force, which includes an Indian Institute of Technology-Kanpur professor and former chiefs of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited and National Aerospace Laboratories, is examining all these aspects," a source told the newspaper. "The government will take a call after the report is submitted in April," the source added.

The source complained that Sukhoi's previous contract with Hindustan Aeronautics – involving the delivery of 272 Su-30MKI twinjet multirole air superiority fighters, did not provide for technology transfer; Delhi considers this to have been a miscalculation.

The FGFA project is part of the Make in India initiative launched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in 2014. Under the deal, Russia's Sukhoi Company and Hindustan Aeronautics Limited would develop an advanced derivative of the T-50 (PAK FA) fifth generation fighter. The multi-billion dollar project is set to include 43 improvements over the T-50, in areas including engine thrust, stealth capabilities, advanced sensors and onboard avionics, as well as supercruise (sustained supersonic flight) capability. Last year, the two countries agreed to commit $4 billion each to R&D, prototype development, testing and infrastructure for the 127 fighters which India expects to cost a total of $25 billion.

Russian experts are divided over the implications of Delhi's ultimatum.

Speaking to Radio Sputnik, Col. (ret) Andrei Golovatyuk, military observer and senior member of the Russian Officers Union, explained that the issue of technology transfer in general is an extremely sensitive one.

"By transferring our technology, we are creating the conditions in the recipient country to stop purchasing our military equipment over the next 10-15 years, and to use our technology to develop its own instead," the officer said. "This is about the same thing that happened with China in the past. In the 1950s and 1960s, we gave them a number of military technologies, and subsequently Beijing made a huge step forward in the development of weapons and military equipment."

"Something similar could now happen with India," Golovatyuk said. "Of course, this is a very delicate issue – both from the diplomatic and the military-technical perspective. If these are today's technologies, and we have next generation technologies in the wings, then it may be advisable to consider their transfer." Otherwise, the logic is that perhaps Moscow should hold off making the transfer.

The issue is further complicated, the expert noted, by the fact that military-technical cooperation with India is very important for Russia. "There is a saying: 'nature abhors a vacuum'. If we were to 'leave' India, the vacuum would immediately be occupied by the Americans, the Germans, the British or the Chinese, who are moving forward in leaps and bounds toward developing their own military equipment."

"India," Golovatyuk stressed, "occupies one of the leading positions in the purchase of Russian arms and military equipment, and we cannot lose this market. Therefore, we should weigh everything very carefully when making a decision."

For his part, prominent Russian military observer Viktor Litovkin is convinced that Delhi's ultimatum is just a bargaining tactic. India, he noted, "simply doesn't want to pay for a fifth-generation aircraft, and is coming up with all sorts of excuses. In fact, they are demanding that Russia give them all the technology for the plane, which can then be built in India's own plants. That is, they want ultra-modern equipment and technology for a hill of beans."

Litovkin stressed that Sukhoi need not concern themselves too much with the Indian side's demands, pointing out that Russia's Indian partners have always held to the tactic of bargaining for the lowest-possible price.

"Some time ago, they bought our aircraft carrier [the Baku, now known as the INS Vikramaditya] for the price of scrap metal," the expert recalled. They wanted us to make it into a super battle-ready warship. We explained that an aircraft carrier is an expensive combat system, and that it was impossible to acquire it for a red cent. They made a lot of noise about it, but ultimately ended up paying."

Ultimately, Litovkin too said that troubles or not, cooperation with India brings out the best in Russian designers. "In general, we should be forthcoming, listen to their complaints, but calmly proceed to do our work," the expert noted. "Yes, on the other hand, they can be cranky, but on the other hand, it's good for us: they force us to bustle about, to think about how to fulfill the tasks that they set for us."

"Everything will turn out ok," the observer emphasized. "We will make them a fifth generation plane. They just need to pay."

Finally, Mikhail Alexandrov, a senior expert at the Center for Military-Political Studies at the Moscow State Institute of International Relations, pointed out that full-scale technology transfer is outside the practice of any country engaged in the creation of advanced weaponry.

"No state engages in the export of cutting edge weapons systems– especially systems which are still under development. And no one ever sells the technology behind these systems – it simply isn't done," the expert stressed.

Moscow, Alexandrov noted, must clearly and calmly emphasize to its Indian partners "that there are no other countries – the French or the Americans included, willing to share their tech and the intricacies of their aircraft [with India]. I think it's to Delhi's advantage to deal with Russia as things are. We offer them more than other countries, including participation in joint projects, which offers a chance to learn, plus the opportunity to assemble the planes themselves in Indian plants. I do not believe it is worth going beyond that."
https://sputniknews.com/military/201703101051455656-russian-indian-fifth-gen-fighter-dispute/

Looks like Russian romance with Indian come to an end. India was trying to be very smart and signed defense deal with Russia before joining US group and think that they trap Russia and for next 25years Russian can't do anything to them and in the meantime they will able to get Western technology and they may not need Russia after that. Now after big failure of Mother of all defense deal and it end up with just 36 planes and western refusal for technology transfer and India realize that Russia is the only source which gives them technology transfer as well with almost no cost. So now that makes India desperate and now they are playing their last card to get technology from Russia because they know that now even Russia don't trust them. As far as i know bear, they will now never transfer technology to India and if India goes to any hanki panki then India consider that money goes to drain. Maximum India can get now is plane only.

You are right about throwing money at our own companies. Problem is we will still need external help. China took so many decades to develop WS engines and they are still not in massive production. This is a problem where throwing money on available talent/skills is not going to cut it. We will need consultancy and study of proven designs to actually arrive anywhere.

Ideally, I will like to see HAL, Russian companies and few major Indian private companies take this up together. Private companies in India have shown ability to absorb technology and extend it. If it is just GTRE we run a risk of prolonged development cycle.

India has started AMCA but sure as hell they will need expertise of an expericened country like Russia to complete it properly.

You are wrong and WS is in full production phase and more then 300+ is build as far as i know
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shenyang_WS-10
 
.
You are wrong and WS is in full production phase and more then 300+ is build as far as i know
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shenyang_WS-10
Thats an unoffical estimate. Plus, reliability of the engine is still to be proven. Usually you produce more engines than planes for spare etc.

Looks like Russian romance with Indian come to an end. India was trying to be very smart and signed defense deal with Russia before joining US group and think that they trap Russia and for next 25years Russian can't do anything to them and in the meantime they will able to get Western technology and they may not need Russia after that. Now after big failure of Mother of all defense deal and it end up with just 36 planes and western refusal for technology transfer and India realize that Russia is the only source which gives them technology transfer as well with almost no cost. So now that makes India desperate and now they are playing their last card to get technology from Russia because they know that now even Russia don't trust them. As far as i know bear, they will now never transfer technology to India and if India goes to any hanki panki then India consider that money goes to drain. Maximum India can get now is plane only.

Actually it equally applies to Russia as well. Read my older posts. Either bear will deliver on its promise or they can find someone else to fund their development.
 
.
Thats an unoffical estimate. Plus, reliability of the engine is still to be proven. Usually you produce more engines than planes for spare etc.



Actually it equally applies to Russia as well. Read my older posts. Either bear will deliver on its promise or they can find someone else to fund their development.

WS10 is in production and i think Chinese are that much smart to look into reliability of the engines and there is always room for improvements. Regarding your proven statement i feel it is childish because they are using it in three platforms (J11B,J15 ad J16) and it shows how reliable and proven platform it is. 300 plus is not a joke
 
.
It is in production and i think Chinese are that much smart to look into reliability of the engines and there is always room for improvements. Regarding your proven statement i feel it is childish because they are using it in three platforms (J11B,J15 ad J16) and it shows how reliable and proven platform it is
What really is childish is to take something as proven without giving it enough time so all the issues come forth. These are complex machines, infact most complex machines. Unless they are being used for five or six years it does not matter if they are being used in one or 100 platforms. BTW, these platforms actually use different engines. WS-10G is J-20 specific stealth engine.

Lastly, the entire point was about stealth engines. I re-read the article. WS-10 derivatives are used elsewhere have an unofficial number of 300 or 500. Nowhere it says that WS-10G has 500 number built. I think my original point stands, China has not yet mass produced WS-10G for J-20.

And then there is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xian_WS-15 . WS-15 -- 180 KN engine which was supposed to power J-20. Again, it is not in mass production.
 
.
What really is childish is to take something as proven without giving it enough time so all the issues come forth. These are complex machines, infact most complex machines. Unless they are being used for five or six years it does not matter if they are being used in one or 100 platforms. BTW, these platforms actually use different engines. WS-10G is J-20 specific stealth engine.

Lastly, the entire point was about stealth engines. I re-read the article. WS-10 derivatives are used elsewhere have an unofficial number of 300 or 500. Nowhere it says that WS-10G has 500 number built. I think my original point stands, China has not yet mass produced WS-10G for J-20.

And then there is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xian_WS-15 . WS-15 -- 180 KN engine which was supposed to power J-20. Again, it is not in mass production.

Read again and it is not WS15 but WS10 and it is in mass production and its mean that its clear all its test. Do you know how production planning works? and what is the meaning if someone says it is in production? The first run was in 1990 (i.e 27 years back)
 
.
Read again and it is not WS15 but WS10 and it is in mass production and its mean that its clear all its test. Do you know how production planning works? and what is the meaning if someone says it is in production?

Read it again, it is about WS-10G. Which is a TVC derivative of WS-10 for J-20. J-20 stealth engine is not in mass production (obviously).

Even other derivatives of WS engine family are not offically used widely. Look at your JF-17. It would have been first to get those engines.
 
.
Read it again, it is about WS-10G. Which is a TVC derivative of WS-10 for J-20. J-20 stealth engine is not in mass production (obviously).

WS10A is in mass production and WS10G is latest version still in testing phase. Now please back to topic
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom