What's new

India’s air defence upgrades are eroding Pakistan’s offensive capability

. .
Just imagine how much money the 2 countries have spent on weapons that could be used for Healthcare, sanitation, desalination plants, educational institutes.

Spending is one thing, spending on acquiring rather than developing is worse.
 
.
Just imagine how much money the 2 countries have spent on weapons that could be used for Healthcare, sanitation, desalination plants, educational institutes.

India and Pakistan's defence budget is peanut in comparison to USA and China.
 
. . . .
INDIA’S AIR DEFENCE EFFORTS ARE ERODING PAKISTAN’S OFFENSIVE ABILITY
ShareTweet

Through its deployment of land-attack cruise missiles (LACM) and various ballistic missiles, Pakistan stated that it is maintaining “minimum credible deterrence.” However, while that might be accurate in terms of its nuclear deployment capability, Pakistan’s conventional deterrence is at risk of eroding.

By ‘conventional deterrence,’ we refer to Pakistan’s ability to leverage its conventional capabilities – such as airstrikes, deploy armoured columns, or launch conventional warheads at long-range – to dissuade its adversary India from instigating a potential conflict through a pre-emptive strike.

The main causes for this erosion of capability stem from multiple factors, but the most pressing problem, at least in the near-term, is India’s significant investment in ground-based air defence systems. This would include the flagship, the S-400, and an assortment of other potent solutions, such as the Barak 8.

The Impact of India’s Air Defence Efforts
In response to its airstrike on Balakot, the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) undertook a retaliatory air campaign – designated “Swift Retort” – centered on its core assets, namely the F-16, JF-17, Mirage III/5, Falcon DA-20 electronic warfare (EW) jammer, and Erieye airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) system.

Whatever the intent of Swift Retort, it was without a doubt a template of an offensive counter-air (OCA) package. Moreover, with some element of surprise to India (such as the disproportionate size of the OCA force), the PAF had demonstrated a credible offensive capability should India trigger a conflict.

However, the PAF’s ability to exercise that capability is eroding in the face of India’s growing investment in ground-based air defence systems (adding to its significant spending on new multi-role fighters).

The most significant of these new air defence assets is the S-400. In 2018, India signed the $5.5 billion USD contract with Russia for the long-range surface-to-air missile (SAM) system. While the S-400 is best known for the 40N6 missile, which offers a range of up to 400 km, it is in fact a multi-layered solution comprising of various SAMs, including the 250 km 48NG, 120 km 9M96E2 and 40 km 9M96E.

Though Washington is opposing the sale, it appears that India is on-track to start receiving the S-400 after 2020, according to the Russian Federal Service for Military-Technical-Cooperation.[1]

In addition to linking the S-400 into an integrated air defence ground environment (ADGE), which will see it draw on gap filler radars (to plugin blind spots of the S-400’s long-range, high-altitude radar), India will also deploy the Barak 8-based MRSAM platform at-scale through the 2020s. The baseline Barak 8 offers a range of up to 70 km.[2] Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) is also developing a long-range variant of the Barak-8, i.e., the Barak 8ER, which could potentially have a range of up to 150 km[3]…

Source:
https://quwa.org/2019/11/10/indias-air-defence-efforts-are-eroding-pakistans-offensive-ability-2/
Actually the bad thing for India is, that Pakistanis study these toys very well, and then we do what we did earlier this year.
 
. .
Compared to India's airdefence 5-10 years ago, it is actually going to be impressive the amount of SAM system, etc. going to be green lighted.
 
.
What's ASELSAN KORAL, originally designed to subdue the Greek S-300, for??? Definitely it's "libraries" will be updated for S-400!! It's already battle proven in the Syrian theater (USA+Russia+Israil+France etc.) with 200km range...

Naval and airborne versions are being tested....

w704_5.jpg


Pakistani drone will also come into equation as minimum operation level for s400 is 100 feet height, where as drone can fly lower than 100 feet. I think Pakistan is going to invest heavily in drone technology in coming years
Leverage the Turkish lead in UAVs fulfilling the entire spectrum...

Years ago, Turkish Air Forces trained against Azerbaijani S-300's... Russia didn't object. You know this systems all export variants, so it doesn't really create a big problem for Russia's own air defence.
So if they so choose, probably Pakistan can easly train her pilots against Turkish or Chinese S-400's... Russia won't care.
Export version is not equal to the indigenous version....
 
.
What's ASELSAN KORAL, originally designed to subdue the Greek S-300, for??? Definitely it's "libraries" will be updated for S-400!! It's already battle proven in the Syrian theater (USA+Russia+Israil+France etc.) with 200km range...

Naval and airborne versions are being tested....

w704_5.jpg



Leverage the Turkish lead in UAVs fulfilling the entire spectrum...


Export version is not equal to the indigenous version....
So Koral can make S 400 useless if it is placed at maximum of 200 km from it?
Also Turkish, Chineese and Indian S 400 systems will be same?

@Khafee sir wats the update of F 16s which u talked about.
 
.
What's ASELSAN KORAL, originally designed to subdue the Greek S-300, for??? Definitely it's "libraries" will be updated for S-400!! It's already battle proven in the Syrian theater (USA+Russia+Israil+France etc.) with 200km range...

Naval and airborne versions are being tested....

w704_5.jpg



Leverage the Turkish lead in UAVs fulfilling the entire spectrum...


Export version is not equal to the indigenous version....


KORAL_Radar_ES_Electronic_Support_System_Aselsan_Turkey_Turkish_army_military_equipment_defense_industry_001.jpg


Koral_4.png


@Khafee sir wats the update of F 16s which u talked about.
:angel:
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom