What's new

Indian SSBN Arihant completes successful Strategic Deterrent Patrol

So now you are dragging in your commercial entities in a defence related thread....save face much.
Does the likes of Tejas, Arjun, Sitara etc, etc, put a lid on your gab.

Commercial entities ? How else would you produce advanced weapon systems without even having the industrial capability?

Yeah it needs some engineering/technology background to understand this.

As for Arihant, it's operational. Have a good cry about it.
 
Commercial entities ? How else would you produce advanced weapon systems without even having the industrial capability?

Yeah it needs some engineering/technology background to understand this.

As for Arihant, it's operational. Have a good cry about it.
Why are you wasting your time?
 
So now you are dragging in your commercial entities in a defence related thread....save face much.
Does the likes of Tejas, Arjun, Sitara etc, etc, put a lid on your gab.


I hope YOU DONT choke looking at This

IMG_7772.JPG

INS+Satpura+%2528F48%2529+Shivalik+class+frigates+or+Project+17+class+frigates+are+multi-role+frigates+with+stealth+features+being+built+for+the+Indian+Navy+%25283%2529.jpg


ins-vikrant-construction.jpg


upload_2018-11-8_19-46-41.jpeg



OSTRICH bury your head in sand

AND tell us its NOT HAPPENING

the SHIPS above are INDIAN BUILT...…….. AND INDIAN DESIGNED .. BY INDIAN HANDS & BRAINS

kOLKATTA CLASS destroyers
Shivilk CLASS frigates
VIKRANT CARRIER
Arihant nuclear SSBN

keep saying its not happened
 
Commercial entities ? How else would you produce advanced weapon systems without even having the industrial capability?

Yeah it needs some engineering/technology background to understand this.

As for Arihant, it's operational. Have a good cry about it.
So going by the esteemed Indian logic, Pakistan has no industrial back ground and as you keep blabbering can't-even-produce-crude-steel bunch.... yet it's not only producing but even exporting, Tanks, Aircraft, Guns and missiles, yet the micro power which holds so many patents is still running around like a headless chicken with it's projects like Tejas, Arjun and others, suggest you hang these patent certificated around your neck and use the image as your dp. :D

Yes you are doing a good job
Not quite since i missed you out.

I hope YOU DONT choke looking at This

IMG_7772.JPG

INS+Satpura+%2528F48%2529+Shivalik+class+frigates+or+Project+17+class+frigates+are+multi-role+frigates+with+stealth+features+being+built+for+the+Indian+Navy+%25283%2529.jpg


ins-vikrant-construction.jpg


View attachment 517012


OSTRICH bury your head in sand

AND tell us its NOT HAPPENING

the SHIPS above are INDIAN BUILT...…….. AND INDIAN DESIGNED .. BY INDIAN HANDS & BRAINS

kOLKATTA CLASS destroyers
Shivilk CLASS frigates
VIKRANT CARRIER
Arihant nuclear SSBN

keep saying its not happened
Lol, you are the same clown who copy pastes Indian stuff on Pakistani threads just to feel good.
I will not put an egg on your face by posting Pakistani stuff here....fanboy.
 
I hope YOU DONT choke looking at This

IMG_7772.JPG

INS+Satpura+%2528F48%2529+Shivalik+class+frigates+or+Project+17+class+frigates+are+multi-role+frigates+with+stealth+features+being+built+for+the+Indian+Navy+%25283%2529.jpg


ins-vikrant-construction.jpg


View attachment 517012


OSTRICH bury your head in sand

AND tell us its NOT HAPPENING

the SHIPS above are INDIAN BUILT...…….. AND INDIAN DESIGNED .. BY INDIAN HANDS & BRAINS

kOLKATTA CLASS destroyers
Shivilk CLASS frigates
VIKRANT CARRIER
Arihant nuclear SSBN

keep saying its not happened
Report and move on. He's just derailing the thread.
 
Country with huge Industrial background, Pakistan, exported weapons like Missiles, Tanks, Aircrafts and arms worth of 3Mil USD in 2017

Country with micro Industrial background, India, with failed projects like Tejas, Arjun and others exported weapons worth of 56Mil USD in 2017

https://knoema.com/atlas/ranks/Arms-exports?baseRegion=BR#

However, Pakistani articles claim it needs be 1 Billion in 2 years. India is truly behind, in terms of publishing articles like that. But, they will reach ~200 million plus in 2018. Coz of the sale of 3 JF17 to Nigeria. Lets not go into if the thunder is Chinese or Pakistan.

One thing to notice, even though India is the largest arms importer, It also is a major arms manufacturer as well. Something Pakistan cannot claim.

https://www.sipri.org/databases/armsindustry
 
Report and move on. He's just derailing the thread.


windjammer = is struggling to admit that indi has just become only the 6th nation on the planet to design build launch and commission into service a nuclear powered ballistic missle submarine.

He would rather talk about Tejas Arjun and Pakistani exports ………. what exports fool
 
Keep the abusive language to yourself, asshole.

We have demonstrated multiple launches of our SLBMs from the submarine & this was widely reported.

Now STFU.


Screw yourself you little rat-India. Fk yourself, You rats are there to be used and abused. you should have known by now. LIVE WITH IT.

Show us the fcking proof that you have tested your missiles using the sub NOT the static pontoons, till then, keep that stinking Indian curry munching mouth of yours firmly shut. Savy?
 
Since rape is endemic among your kind, you should, must be asking your mom about your parenthood proof.

Listen kiddo, its not difficult to comprehend. Go and find a video and paste here on this forum where your sub has fired a missile in open sea. Something similar to this (WITH NO PONTOON).



Till then, just fk off from here and don't waste bandwidth.
Lol.
How do we know it is not an underwater mobile platform like the one developed by MBDA.
The official Pakistani press release never mentioned it is a submarine.

https://www.mbda-systems.com/press-...of-scalp-naval-frances-future-cruise-missile/

I exist , you exist (even though might be result of rape since its your national sport), Ababeel with enhanced missile cone exists, what do not exits is the proof of your fking cuntry claim that it has mated the missiles with its sub and fired in open sea! All previous tests done and shown to world are conducted using static poonton.
Ababeel is far away from operational status.
Only one test so far that too 22 months back.
 
Lol.
How do we know it is not an underwater mobile platform like the one developed by MBDA.
The official Pakistani press release never mentioned it is a submarine.

https://www.mbda-systems.com/press-...of-scalp-naval-frances-future-cruise-missile/


Ababeel is far away from operational status.
Only one test so far that too 22 months back.


We have claimed that our second strike capability is operational and we have demonstrated that (without the use of pontoons). Can you not atleast show the proof that you have finally launched your missiles in deep sea without pontoons anywhere in sight?

Ababeel is really not a different missile altogether rather enhanced shaheen with a different warhead with MIRV capability. That has been tested and that's all we need to know.
 
We have claimed that our second strike capability is operational and we have demonstrated that (without the use of pontoons). Can you not atleast show the proof that you have finally launched your missiles in deep sea without pontoons anywhere in sight?

Ababeel is really not a different missile altogether rather enhanced shaheen with a different warhead with MIRV capability. That has been tested and that's all we need to know.
No official press release ever stated that. Give link if otherwise

MIRV payload needs at least 5-6 tests before it becomes operational.
 
So have you , have you not seen the video of your conception ? If not, going by your logic, how do you know you are your father's son?

Just putting a circular cone on a missile, instead of a pointy one does not make it a MIRV missile. Come on show us the video of Ababeels MIRV separation, if you claim it is a MIRV missile.



Lets put things here in perspective shall we?

Your fking cuntry has been over zealously projecting the launch of your sea based missiles all these years, albeit using the static pontoons. So how come there is the no proof of the same being fired from the sub? Are you suggesting your country do not have the capability to record the video of the test in deep sea? Its not something out of ordinary. You have been capturing the pontoon based launches in past. No one is asking to show the missile warhead separation after the launch or hitting the target. Just simple fking launch!

With this background, now you little rat-Indian, show the proof or bugger off.

No official press release ever stated that. Give link if otherwise

MIRV payload needs at least 5-6 tests before it becomes operational.

Stated what?

Ababeel is the not the discussion. your so called sea based "deterrence" is. So show us the proof that you have alteast tested this capability, if not fully functional.
 
Lets put things here in perspective shall we?

Your fking cuntry has been over zealously projecting the launch of your sea based missiles all these years, albeit using the static pontoons. So how come there is the no proof of the same being fired from the sub? Are you suggesting your country do not have the capability to record the video of the test in deep sea? Its not something out of ordinary. You have been capturing the pontoon based launches in past. No one is asking to show the missile warhead separation after the launch or hitting the target. Just simple fking launch!

With this background, now you little rat-Indian, show the proof or bugger off.



Stated what?

Ababeel is the not the discussion. your so called sea based "deterrence" is. So show us the proof that you have alteast tested this capability, if not fully functional.


Let me explain one last time, why there will not be video of it ever.

Have you ever seen what what INS Arihant looks like - a video , or even proper picture of it, during building launching, commissioning.

Why not ?

Arihants class has been classified as Top secret in India, one is not allowed to film it or click its pic.
No cameras are allowed in its vicinity.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom