hkdas
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2012
- Messages
- 2,271
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
I don't agree that increasing the number of operators will necessarily affect the quality of the training as long as the NSG also increases its capacity to train operators and allocates/receives more budget per operator- which it is succeeding on both accounts-With the regional centres in Hydrabad and Chennai being "mini-Mansears" in a sense, able to impart all relevant refresher training on operators once they have passed out of Mansear and are deployed regionally in the Hubs so there is no extra burden on the NSG's central/main training centre- additionally the SRG is actively being reduced so more budget is being freed up for the SAG operators.
The US SOFs have been expanded many times in the past 13 years and if anything they are better trained today than ever before.
they are taking about increasing number not the budget of the force. increasing number of hubs are good, but increasing number of commandos are not. in all probability there is no need for 460 personnel in one hub. in case of an emergency like 26/11, the size of NSG deployed will be less than 150. The number of active duty FBI HRT is less that 90(the US counterpart of NSG) and the country like US were more crimes are occurring has only this small no of personals, NSG is increasing the number like they are creating an infantry unit. total number of NSG is ~10,000. while FBI HRT is >90... what NSG need is a better mobility, not number. as we all know that the NSG is facing deficit of choppers. there is no decision for allotting additional helicopters for NSG.
the budget for HRT is many times bigger than that of NSG,