What's new

Indian Political Corner | General Election 2014, All Updates & Discussions.

.
Ordinance to protect convicted netas 'complete nonsense', says Rahul Gandhi

New Delhi: Rahul Gandhi today denounced the controversial ordinance to negate the Supreme Court verdict on convicted lawmakers as "complete nonsense" and said it should be torn up and thrown away, in a huge embarrassment to his own government.

Making a surprise brief appearance at a meet-the-press programme of his party's general secretary Ajay Maken at the Press Club in New Delhi, he said the ordinance should be "torn up and thrown away"

The government, which had pushed the ordinance and forwarded to President Pranab Mukherjee in questionable haste this week despite strong objections, may now have to withdraw the ordinance.

Last night, even the President had called three union ministers including Law Minister Kapil Sibal to discuss his own reservations on the need to bring such an ordinance.

"I personally think what the government is doing on the ordinance is wrong. It was a political decision, every party does it, and there is a time to stop this nonsense," Rahul Gandhi said. "It is about time that political parties mind and stop making these type of compromises. If we actually want to stop corruption then we cannot make these compromises."

The 43-year-old Congress vice president did not waste much time trashing the ordinance moments after he made a surprise appearance at the press conference.

The ordinance overturns a Supreme Court disqualifying convicted MPs and MLAs, and allows them to stay on without a salary or voting rights, if a court stays their conviction.

The proposed move has ranged the ruling party against its own government ahead of polls in five states later this year and the national elections due by May.

Rahul Gandhi's comments came just after the Law Minister defended the ordinance in an interview to NDTV.

"We will honour the Supreme Court order. We are giving no protection to anybody. If any individual is convicted, it's only if he or she gets a stay of conviction or stay of sentence, can he be allowed to participate in proceedings. If no stay is given, by the Court , either of conviction or of sentence, he can not just sit in the house," Mr Sibal told NDTV.

The stand by a person widely seen as Congress party's Prime Ministerial face came as a relief to several party members who had gone public with their criticism of the move.

"Most of us are against the ordinance, why the hurry?" asked Congress MP Sandeep Dikshit, the latest in a growing queue of Congressmen going public with their criticism of the move. Milind Deora, Digvijaya Singh, Priya Dutt and Anil Shastri have also questioned the rush to bring the ordinance.

The BJP had asked the President last evening to reject the ordinance, calling it "illegal, immoral and unconstitutional."

Ordinance to protect convicted netas 'complete nonsense', says Rahul Gandhi | NDTV.com
 
.

NEW DELHI: In a landmark judgement on Friday, the Supreme Court for the first time allowed voters to cast negative vote by pressing a button saying none of the candidates is worthy of his vote. (Highlights)

The SC asked the Election Commission to provide None Of The Above (NOTA) button on EVMs and ballot papers.

The apex court said the right to vote and the right to say NOTA are both part of basic right of voters.

"When a large number of voters will press NOTA button, it will force political parties to choose better candidates. Negative voting would lead to systemic change in polls," the apex bench observed.

The bench also observed that implementation of NOTA option was akin to 'abstain option' given to MPs and MLAs during voting in respective houses.

The SC directed the EC to start implementing NOTA button on EVMs forthwith in a phased manner and asked the Centre to render all assistance.

A bench headed by Chief Justice P Sathasivam said that negative voting would foster purity and vibrancy of elections and ensure wide participation as people who are not satisfied with the candidates in the fray would also turn up to express their opinion rejecting contestants.

The bench noted that the concept of negative voting is prevalent in 13 countries and even in India, parliamentarians are given an option to press the button for abstaining while voting takes place in the House.

The court said right to reject candidates in elections is part of fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression given by the Constitution to Indian citizens.

It said that democracy is all about choice and significance of right of citizens to cast negative voting is massive.

With the concept of negative voting, the voters who are dissatisfied with the candidates in the fray would turn up in large number to express their opinion which would put unscrupulous elements and impersonators out of the polls, it said.

The bench, while reading out the operative portion of the judgement, did not throw light on a situation in case the votes cast under no option head outnumber the votes got by the candidates.

It said that secrecy of votes cast under the no option category must be maintained by the Election Commission.

The court passed the order on a PIL filed by an NGO, People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) which had submitted that voters be given the right to negative voting.

Agreeing with the NGO's plea, the bench passed the path-breaking verdict and introduced the concept of negative voting in the election process, saying that it would further empower the voters in exercising their franchise.

The latest verdict is part of series of judgements passed by the apex court on the election process.

Earlier, the apex court had restrained people in custody from contesting elections.

The apex court has also ruled that MPs and MLAs would stand disqualified after being convicted of serious crimes. The government has brought an ordinance seeking to negate the court's judgement striking down a provision in the electoral law that protected convicted lawmakers from immediate disqualification.

A two-judge bench of the apex court had felt that the issue on negative voting needed to be adjudicated by a larger bench as there were certain doubts over the interpretation of the ruling passed by a Constitution Bench in the Kuldip Nayar Vs Union of India case relating to a voter's right.

Under the existing provisions of Section 49(O) of the Representation of People Act, a voter who after coming to a polling booth does not want to cast his vote, has to inform the presiding officer of his intention not to vote, who in turn would make an entry in the relevant rule book after taking the signature of the said elector.

According to the PUCL, Section 49(O) was violative of the constitutional provisions guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) (Freedom of Speech and Expression) and Article 21 (Right to Liberty) and violated the concept of secret ballot.
(With inputs from PTI)



:yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo::yahoo:
 
.
The right to reject does not actually mean anything because even if None of the Above gets most of the votes no fresh election will be conducted and the candidate who gets the maximum other votes will win.

In an ideal situation the election to that constituency should be cancelled and all those people who were on the ballot should be prohibited from standing again. This will force parties to select good candidates
 
. .
Chidambaram and Modi: Close encounters with facts

Which government – UPA or NDA – has been better for India’s economic and social indicators? Dismiss the rhetoric and stick to the facts. In this analysis, I’ve chosen 10 key parameters. They cover both economic and social criteria.

1.GDP growth:

Average GDP growth in 1998-2004 (NDA) was 6% a year. Average annual GDP growth in 2004-13 (UPA), up to June 30, 2013, was 7.9%.

Caveat 1: The Vajpayee-led NDA battled US-led economic sanctions following the Pokhran-II nuclear test in May 1998. It faced a short but expensive Kargil war in 1999 and the dotcom bust in 2000. When it took office, it had the lag effect of the East Asian financial crisis of 1997-98 to contend with.

Caveat 2: The UPA government, in contrast, benefitted from the economic momentum of the high (8.1%) GDP growth rate of 2003-04 – the NDA government’s final year – and rode that wave. The global liquidity bubble in 2004-08 bouyed foreign mflows, helping UPA-I achieve a high GDP growth rate in its first term. The Lehman Brothers collapse in September 2008 did hurt the Indian economy but the ensuing US Federal Reserve asset buying programme attracted a steady flow of near-zero interest dollars into India from 2009.

Despite these caveats, the UPA government’s average annual GDP growth rate of 7.9% in 2004-13 clearly scores over the NDA government’s average annual growth rate of 6%. First strike to UPA.

2. Current Account Deficit:

2004: (+) $7.36 billion (surplus).

2013: (-) $80 billion.

The winner here is clearly NDA. It ran a current account surplus in 2002, 2003 and 2004. Under UPA this dipped into deficit from 2006 and has spun downwards since.

3. Trade deficit:

2004: (-) $13.16 billion.

2013: (-) $180 billion.

Again, advantage NDA.

4. Fiscal deficit:

2004: 4.7% of GDP.

2013: 4.8% of GDP.

Not much to choose between the two.

Caveat: This extract from the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI) report, published in 2010, explains why and when the UPA government’s fiscal defict began to spiral out of control.

“The central budget in 2008–2009, announced in February 2008, seemed to continue the progress towards FRBM targets by showing a low fiscal deficit of 2.5% of GDP. However, the 2008–2009 budget quite clearly made inadequate allowances for rural schemes like the farm loan waiver and the expansion of social security schemes under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA), the Sixth Pay Commission award and subsidies for food, fertilizer, and petroleum.”

“These together pushed up the fiscal deficit sharply to higher levels. There were also off-budget items like the issue of oil and fertilizer bonds, which should be added to give a true picture of fiscal deficit in 2008–2009. The fiscal deficit shot up to 8.9% of GDP (10.7% including off-budget bonds) against 5.0% in 2007–2008 and the primary surplus turned into a deficit of 3.5% of GDP.

“The huge increase in public expenditure in 2008–2009 of 31.2% that followed a 27.4% increase in 2007–2008 was driven by the electoral cycle with parliamentary elections scheduled within a year of the announcement of the budget.”

The recent announcement of the Seventh Pay Commission comes again, not unexpectedly, at the end of an electoral cycle.


5. Inflation:

1998-2004: 5%.

2004-2013: 9% (Both figures are averaged out over their respective tenures).

Advantage again to NDA. Inflation under NDA was on average half that under UPA, leading to the RBI’s controversial tight money policy, high interest rates and rising EMIs.

6. External Debt:

March 2004: $111.6 billion.

March 2013: $390 billion.

The UPA suffers badly in this comparision, a result of lack of confidence in India’s economy and currency following retrospective tax legislation and other regressive policies, especially during UPA-2.

7. Jobs:

1999-2004: 60 million new jobs created.

2004-11: 14.6 million jobs created.

Clearly, the UPA’s big failure has been jobless growth – a bad electoral omen.

8. Rupee:

1998-2004: Variation: Rs. 39 to 49 per $.

2004-13: Variation: Rs. 39 to 68 per $.

The NDA government’s economic and fiscal policies, despite the various crises of 1998-2000 pointed out earlier, evoked more global confidence, leading to a relatively stable rupee (Rs. 10 variation) compared to the Rs. 29 variation during UPA’s tenure.

9. HDI:

2004: India was ranked 123rd globally on the human development index (HDI) in 2004, with a score of 0.453.

2013: India has slipped 13 places to 136th globally on the HDI in 2013 with a score of 0.554.

10. Subsidies:

2004: Rs. 44,327 crore.

2013: Rs. 2,31,584 crore.

Here again, profligate welfarism, as the ADBI report quoted earlier shows, has led to a rising subsidy bill. Worse, a significant amount is siphoned off by a corrupt nexus of politicians, officials and middlemen.

Conclusion: UPA scores above NDA on one of the 10 parameters (GDP growth), is level on one other parameter (fiscal deficit) while NDA does better than UPA on the remaining eight parameters.

The next time Finance Minister P. Chidambaram wishes to stage an encounter with facts, he would do well to be aware of those facts.

Sources: Economic Survey of India, UNDP, IMF, Planning Commission of India.

Chidambaram and Modi: Close encounters with facts by Head On : Minhaz Merchant's blog-The Times Of India
 
.
547521_411784772256929_1289489412_n.jpg
 
. .
Jamaat - e - Ulema - e - Hind support of Modi

Jamaat - e - Ulema - e - Hind twenty thousand Muslims in Narendra Modi's rally to support the claims. On Friday, Gate Turkmen brigade in the area, also tried to rally but police did not allow it. Jamaat says that she would belie Congress propaganda that Muslims are not with BJP.
State BJP headquarters at 14 Pantmarg Jamaat - e - Ulema - e - Hind Theological meeting of the national anthem began. The first song Vande Mataram was fixed but no consensus on that.

Blue Vijender Gupta and Vijay Goel at the meeting was to attend but only Vijay Jolly came. However, Jamaat - e - Ulema - e - Hind President Maulana Suhaib Casmi the meeting claimed that the Congress has betrayed the country in the last 65 years and will suffer the consequences in the coming elections. Turkmen gate rally at Maulana said that he wanted to convey the message of unity among Muslims, but does not allow Congress to put pressure on the police.

Jamaat - e - Ulema - e - Hind President Maulana Suhaib said the Turkmen Gate Casmi but we wanted to rally the Congress MLAs and MPs and they did not let us rally. We came up with 20 to 25 thousand Muslims will support Narendra Modi to live. "

Theological meeting with state officials did not have any major BJP. Vijender Gupta was the first to come, but she did not come. Vijay Jolly said his party arrived at the meeting, including Muslims, the message is inclusive society.

BJP leader Vijay Jolly said, "We favor a society inclusive of all people and that's the message we want to give Modi Ji's rally.

http://aajtak.intoday.in/story/modi-delhi-rally-gets-20000-muslims!-1-743128.html
 
.
जमात-ए-उलेमा-ए-हिंद ने नरेंद्र मोदी की रैली में बीस हजार मुसलमानों के साथ समर्थन देने का दावा किया है. शुक्रवार को तुर्कमान गेट इलाके में जमात ने रैली भी करनी चाही लेकिन इसकी इजाजत पुलिस ने नहीं दी. जमात का कहना है कि वो कांग्रेस के दुष्प्रचार को झुठलाना चाहते हैं कि मुसलमान बीजेपी के साथ नहीं हैं.
बीजेपी के स्टेट हेडक्वार्टर 14 पंतमार्ग में जमात-ए-उलेमा-ए-हिंद के उलेमाओं की बैठक राष्ट्रगान से शुरू हुई. पहले वंदे मातरम गाना तय हुआ था लेकिन उस पर सहमति नहीं बनी.

बैठक में यूं तो विजेंद्र गुप्ता और विजय गोयल को भी आना था लेकिन आए सिर्फ विजय जौली. बहरहाल, जमात-ए-उलेमा-ए-हिंद के अध्यक्ष मौलाना सुहैब कासमी ने बैठक में दावा किया कि कांग्रेस ने पिछले 65 सालों से देश को छला है और इसका खामियाजा उसे आने वाले चुनावों में भुगतना होगा. मौलाना ने कहा कि वो तुर्कमान गेट पर रैली कर मुसलमानों में एकता का संदेश देना चाहते थे लेकिन कांग्रेस ने पुलिस पर इजाजत ना देने का दबाव डाला.

जमात-ए-उलेमा-ए-हिंद के अध्यक्ष मौलाना सुहैब कासमी ने कहा तुर्कमान गेट पर हम रैली करना चाहते थे लेकिन वहां विधायक और सांसद दोनों कांग्रेस के हैं और उन्होंने हमें रैली नहीं करने दी. हम 20 से 25 हजार मुसलमान भाइयों के साथ पहुंचकर नरेंद्र मोदी जी को समर्थन देंगे.'

उलेमाओं के साथ बैठक में राज्य बीजेपी का भी कोई बड़ा पदाधिकारी नहीं था. पहले विजेंद्र गुप्ता का आना तय था लेकिन वो भी नहीं आए. बैठक में पहुंच विजय जौली ने कहा कि उनकी पार्टी मुसलमानों समेत पूरे समाज को साथ लेकर चलने का संदेश दे रही है.

बीजेपी नेता विजय जौली ने कहा, 'हम समाज के सभी लोगों को साथ लेकर चलने के हिमायती हैं और यही संदेश हम मोदी जी की रैली में भी देना चाहते हैं.'

मस्जिदों में पर्चे बांट रही है BJP
मोदी की रैली में मुसलमानों को जुटाने के लिये पार्टी राजधानी की करीब 100 मस्जिदों में पर्चे भी बांट रही है. मोदी को लेकर मुस्लिमों की शंकाओं का समाधान करने के लिये पार्टी ने खास पर्चे छपवाये हैं जिसमें 1947 से लेकर अब तक देश में हुए बड़े दंगों की फेहरिस्त जारी की गई है.

क्या लिखा है पर्चे में
दिल्ली बीजेपी के अल्पसंख्यक मोर्चे के अध्यक्ष आतिफ रशीद ने भी दावा किया है कि रैली में 20,000 से ज्यादा मुसलमान जुटेंगे. रशीद ने कहा, 'मुस्लिम समुदाय ने गोधरा दंगों को लेकर सवाल किए लेकिन हमने उनका जवाब इस पर्चे में दिया है कि आजादी के बाद से देश में हजारों सांप्रदायिक दंगे हुए हैं. इसमें गुजरात की मौजूदा स्थिति और वहां के मुसलमानों की आर्थिक स्थिति के बारे में भी बताया गया है.' उन्होंने बताया कि मुस्लिम बहुल इलाकों से लोगों को रैली में लाने के लिये 340 बसें लगाई गई हैं.

दिल्ली विधानसभा में विपक्ष के नेता विजय मल्होत्रा ने बताया कि 40 से ज्यादा देशों के राजनयिकों ने रैली में शामिल होने की सहमति दे दी है.



और भी... modi delhi rally gets 20000 muslims!:

That google translation sux...

The Game is On... This is turning to be better than we thought.

BJP should try to bring Ajit Singh onboard... Even though he is not trust worthy but he has some solid support of Muslims in UP..
 
. .
That google translation sux...

The Game is On... This is turning to be better than we thought.

BJP should try to bring Ajit Singh onboard... Even though he is not trust worthy but he has some solid support of Muslims in UP..

LOL ajit singh has also no support after MZFRNGR riots ,neither jats nor muslims like him.

adding him will end growing support of jats for bjp in West UP,big NONO.
 
.
Last edited by a moderator:
.
this post is the reply for those believe that Muslims doesn't like modi...
 
.
he he he he he kya baat hai waise nair sahab apko pata hai sare AAP , JDU , INC, SP and what not are so against BJP and modi these days :azn:

kyonki baki sare baria piece :D BJP me aa gaye hain aur modi ki paancho ungliya ghee me aur sar kharai me hai:yay:

:omghaha::omghaha:

Ye kejrivala saheb ye kahete he ki hamari party me sab honest politician he agar kisi ki bare me koi sabut mileto hum usse nikal denge BJP Congress esa nahi kar sakte ...hmmm thik he saheb AAP is a small party aapke pas sirf 50 neta he yahoo bat jab aap national paty ban jaye tab bol na ...

P.S actully I am not against AAP on the contrary I like to see them winning in delhi lets see how they perform ...
 
.
Back
Top Bottom