Guynextdoor2
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2013
- Messages
- 12,286
- Reaction score
- -42
- Country
- Location
You may be right...But he has learnt this art from Congress itself..If Congress can sell Mahat,a Gandhi and rule for 65 year....so simply he is following some of his foot steps...Do you really think any political party is really comcerned about morality?
There are 3 things that happens in election time..
1- How to appease Muslims to get 15% vote... I would say not appeasement rather kaise Muslim logon ko Topi pehnao with help of some bearded Mullahs around them to get vote...
2- How to talk about Hindu pride...when the same party does not have any answer when Dalit people are not allowed to go inside temple.
3- How to appease poor people...when Gov macinary are corrupt and the nation depends on bussiness people for development....And we will be crazy to think tha pvt beussiness empire will think about the poor people rather than own profit..
This is the tragedy of the nation...So we prefer to some one who is slightly better or less evil than others...This is the state of affairs of our nation..
Mahatma Gandhi was both the leader of the Congress party and served in high offices of the party. They don't need to 'claim' him. He is as much a part of the party's legacy as Patel and Nehru. They don't need anyone's permission (least bit modi) to talk about him.
These guys were sent invitation to join AAP only because they had Gandhi and Shastri as their surname. AAP wants to use these people to garner votes in the name these folk's fathers/grand fathers. A pure display of their dishonest intentions!!! . If they were such an epitome of truthfulness and honesty then then they should have asked people's vote based on their own strength and not Gandhi's and Shashtri's (neither of whom would have supported AAP's brand of politics anyways)..
That's your theory. Fact is Shastri's grandson was a big shot in apple with a package of several crores. He gave it up to join them, it is a sacrifice.