What's new

Indian Political Corner | All Updates & Discussions.

Tell this to Amit Shah.. not me. I know all this.

AS was the same man who was willing to have an alliance with PDP & look what BJP has got out of that alliance?? Our ministers in the state govt. haven't even got good portfolios. Do you know how angry the BJP cadre in Jammu are??

@wolfschanzze regarding promises made.. Tg has hyderabad & a revenue surplus.. AP has no capital & a fiscal deficit..

If BJP has any honour/sense of duty. let it fulfill the promises to us:- Polavaram, money for the capital, special status/ financial+pro-corporate incentives & money for the backward regions of UA & Rayalaseema


Don't take it otherwise, but since following new Finance commission award, states would be getting 10% more of central budget than previous award, shouldn't states finance their development projects from their own kitty?

There are many things like Defence etc which are financed solely out of Central government share of revenue.
 
.
Don't take it otherwise, but since following new Finance commission award, states would be getting 10% more of central budget than previous award, shouldn't states finance their development projects from their own kitty?

There are many things like Defence etc which are financed solely out of Central government share of revenue.


Even with 10% more AP is still in deficit. The promises made at the time of partition should be honoured
 
.
Dear Volunteers,

I am extremely sorry that I am breaking the diktat of not speaking to anyone outside on what transpired in the National Executive meeting, yesterday. Generally, I am a disciplined soldier of the party.

Arvind used to say that when they were coming out of the joint draft committee meeting of the Lokpal in 2011, Kapil Sibal used to ask them not to reveal anything to the outside world. Arvind used to answer that it was his primary duty to inform the nation about the proceedings, as he was not a leader but a representative of the people. Truth and transparency was all that he had.

My presence in the National Executive is only as a representative of the volunteers. And I would be dishonest to accept the gag order. The volunteers cannot be removed from the equation; they are the source of the party. Rather than get information from selective leaks and stray statements, I have decided to give some factual details of the meeting in the public domain.

Last night I was told that disciplinary action would be taken against me, if I revealed anything. So be it – my first allegiance is to the higher truth. Here is an essence of the meeting with regards to removal of YY and PB, based on my understanding. I would request NE to release the minutes of the meeting.

Short background
During the Delhi campaign, Prashant Bhushan had threatened multiple times that he will hold press conference against the party, because of his concerns on candidate selection. Some of us were successful in somehow or other to stave off the threat till the elections. It was alleged that Yogendra Yadav was conspiring against Arvind and some evidences were produced. There were also operational irreconcilable differences and trust deficit between AK, PB and YY

On 26th Feb night when members of the NE went to meet him, Arvind conveyed that he will not be able to work as Convenor, if these two members were part of the PAC. That was the background of the NE on 4th March.

NE meeting
Yogendra said that he understood that Arvind did not want them in PAC, as it was difficult to him to work together. He and Prashant would be happy to stay out of PAC, but they should not be singled out. Two formulas were put forward by him.

·That the PAC be reconstituted and new PAC members be elected through voting. PB and YY will not put their candidature.

·That PAC continue to function in the present form and YY and PB would not attend any of the meetings.

The meeting broke for some time and Manish and others conferred with the Delhi team of Ashish Khetan, Asutosh, Dilip Pandey and others. After reassembling, Manish proposed a resolution that YY and PB be removed from the PAC and it was seconded by Sanjay Singh.

I abstained to vote, because of two contrary reasons

1. Arvind needs a smooth working in the PAC. So, I agreed that PB and YY may be out of PAC and take some alternate important roles.

2. I was taken aback by the resolution of removing them publicly, especially as they themselves were willing to leave.Also, this decision to sack them was against the overwhelming sentiments of volunteers from all over the world.

So, while I agreed that they can step down from the PAC, the manner and intention behind the resolution was not acceptable. Hence, the decision to abstain.

The other details may come when the minutes of meeting is released.


This is not a revolt, nor is this some publicity ploy. I will not go to the press. There may be some repercussions overt and covert against me. So be it.


Jai Hind

Love

Mayank Gandhi

Nation building: Note to volunteers-NE on 4th March


Its a war in AAP ,:pop:
 
Last edited:
. . .
For anybody who followed the campaign trail in Delhi it was very much evident from the beginning itself that kejriwal has also made for himself a cult following similar to what Modi did.

That's not the issue, since that's just a matter of presenting a candidate in the elections. It's about just a single person and a few around him taking decisions for the party and that's what AAP promised not to do and would be one differentiating point to other parties.
 
.
Dear Volunteers,

I am extremely sorry that I am breaking the diktat of not speaking to anyone outside on what transpired in the National Executive meeting, yesterday. Generally, I am a disciplined soldier of the party.

Arvind used to say that when they were coming out of the joint draft committee meeting of the Lokpal in 2011, Kapil Sibal used to ask them not to reveal anything to the outside world. Arvind used to answer that it was his primary duty to inform the nation about the proceedings, as he was not a leader but a representative of the people. Truth and transparency was all that he had.

My presence in the National Executive is only as a representative of the volunteers. And I would be dishonest to accept the gag order. The volunteers cannot be removed from the equation; they are the source of the party. Rather than get information from selective leaks and stray statements, I have decided to give some factual details of the meeting in the public domain.

Last night I was told that disciplinary action would be taken against me, if I revealed anything. So be it – my first allegiance is to the higher truth. Here is an essence of the meeting with regards to removal of YY and PB, based on my understanding. I would request NE to release the minutes of the meeting.

Short background
During the Delhi campaign, Prashant Bhushan had threatened multiple times that he will hold press conference against the party, because of his concerns on candidate selection. Some of us were successful in somehow or other to stave off the threat till the elections. It was alleged that Yogendra Yadav was conspiring against Arvind and some evidences were produced. There were also operational irreconcilable differences and trust deficit between AK, PB and YY

On 26th Feb night when members of the NE went to meet him, Arvind conveyed that he will not be able to work as Convenor, if these two members were part of the PAC. That was the background of the NE on 4th March.

NE meeting
Yogendra said that he understood that Arvind did not want them in PAC, as it was difficult to him to work together. He and Prashant would be happy to stay out of PAC, but they should not be singled out. Two formulas were put forward by him.

·That the PAC be reconstituted and new PAC members be elected through voting. PB and YY will not put their candidature.

·That PAC continue to function in the present form and YY and PB would not attend any of the meetings.

The meeting broke for some time and Manish and others conferred with the Delhi team of Ashish Khetan, Asutosh, Dilip Pandey and others. After reassembling, Manish proposed a resolution that YY and PB be removed from the PAC and it was seconded by Sanjay Singh.

I abstained to vote, because of two contrary reasons

1. Arvind needs a smooth working in the PAC. So, I agreed that PB and YY may be out of PAC and take some alternate important roles.

2. I was taken aback by the resolution of removing them publicly, especially as they themselves were willing to leave.Also, this decision to sack them was against the overwhelming sentiments of volunteers from all over the world.

So, while I agreed that they can step down from the PAC, the manner and intention behind the resolution was not acceptable. Hence, the decision to abstain.

The other details may come when the minutes of meeting is released.


This is not a revolt, nor is this some publicity ploy. I will not go to the press. There may be some repercussions overt and covert against me. So be it.


Jai Hind

Love

Mayank Gandhi

Nation building: Note to volunteers-NE on 4th March


Its a war in AAP ,:pop:

The Core of this letter, :D

There were also operational irreconcilable differences and trust deficit between AK, PB and YY (Arvind Keju, Prashant Bushan, Yogendra Yadav)

On 26th Feb night when members of the NE went to meet him, Arvind conveyed that he will not be able to work as Convenor, if these two members were part of the PAC.

No doubt a true Democrat at last :lol:

537132_752933911391193_1088274276_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
You have basically three Indias, stratified by money, and money only.

1/2 total population: extremely poor. That’s 500 million ppl. They squeak by somehow. Of that figure, some percentage (not really sure, I’m guessing maybe 15-20% or 75-100million ppl) are DIRT POOR. They don’t eat everyday. They may spend their entire lives browsing the public dumps for food and anything they can use at home or possibly resale.
That’s a staggering number, and more poverty than China. You may think Democracy and capitalism work better than communism and capitalism, but the experiment has already been done in India and China, and India (democracy) has lost. Capitalism will not do anything to change the poverty of these 500 million people. Why? It is not designed to, that’s why, and that is a pretty basic failure when it comes to a model on which to base an entire society.

About 450 million lower-, middle-, and upper-middle class. Yes they do the IT jobs and the service jobs (Hello, this is Krish, may I help you?) and the engineering jobs. There’s also a class that produces the arts (classical music and dance, and of course, all things Bollywood). They are not as wealthy as the tech and engineering billionaires, but they don’t have to be because those billionaires are their patrons.

Then there’s the superrich. They do what superrich people everywhere do, and are in fact better thought of as members of the global superrich society.

Yes, the caste system still exists, but in the final analysis, it’s the money that determines status.

But my point is, these are three totally different societies, even though they are all comprised of Indian people. I’d be very careful about lumping them together. My musician friends and associates are as far away from the impoverished India as I am sitting here in Seattle. In fact, they are closer to me culturally than they are to India’s poor.

what truck load of crap ? This is Indian political corner
 
. . .
Tell this to Amit Shah.. not me. I know all this.

AS was the same man who was willing to have an alliance with PDP & look what BJP has got out of that alliance?? Our ministers in the state govt. haven't even got good portfolios. Do you know how angry the BJP cadre in Jammu are??

@wolfschanzze regarding promises made.. Tg has hyderabad & a revenue surplus.. AP has no capital & a fiscal deficit..

If BJP has any honour/sense of duty. let it fulfill the promises it made to us:- Polavaram, money for the capital, special status/ financial+pro-corporate incentives & money for the backward regions of UA & Rayalaseema
BJP promised 1.7 lakh crores to both states over a 5 year period, they will both get it, Rushing won't help anyone.
Let them set the Economy straight first.
 
. . . .
Tell this to Amit Shah.. not me. I know all this.

AS was the same man who was willing to have an alliance with PDP & look what BJP has got out of that alliance?? Our ministers in the state govt. haven't even got good portfolios. Do you know how angry the BJP cadre in Jammu are??

@wolfschanzze regarding promises made.. Tg has hyderabad & a revenue surplus.. AP has no capital & a fiscal deficit..

If BJP has any honour/sense of duty. let it fulfill the promises it made to us:- Polavaram, money for the capital, special status/ financial+pro-corporate incentives & money for the backward regions of UA & Rayalaseema

I would have said these words to amit shah, had i been his advisor mate. for all practical purposes the alliance between bjp and pdp is the best thing to happen for J&K. J&K need to have a long term strategy, and i am hopefull that bjp dsn't compromise on its core promises of abrogating art. 370 and complete inclusion of J&k in to India.' As far as A.p is corncerned bjp has to rise against petty politics and commit to the promises that it made to the people of A.p. A.P should have been given special status along with bihar and bengal... let's see what future holds for A.p..
 
.
Back
Top Bottom