Bang Galore
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2010
- Messages
- 10,685
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
As per AIIMS report just a few days before Sunanda died, she was on no medications at all and had no pre-existing medical condition. Shashi Tharoor and his cohorts are more than capable of arranging an alibi and it is no biggie at all. That is the lamest excuse, he need not have been present at the scene of death at all.
Arranging alibis? There were cameras, he was at a public function- a day long meeting of the Congress.
I have at least not seen any posts from you criticizing non-BJP govts at all and this is not a case of being selective. While I have seen you concur with posts critical of UPA2, any outright criticism from you of congress or its leaders has been largely missing. Anyway, my post was restricted to the govt in Karnataka. SM Krishna's govt was just as corrupt though of course only Bangalore did a lot better during his time. What you accuse me of is exactly what you are guilty of, seeing only one side.
My criticism cannot necessarily be refined to your tastes. I suggest you look harder. I have not defended Krishna because it hasn't come up. Not defending & not attacking cannot be seen as support, atleast by anyone neutral. I have defended the UPA government & ministers when I saw fit but that was equally true of the NDA government of Vajpayee. No selectiveness, unlike you my loyalties do not permanently reside anywhere.
This link debunks all your claims about Justice Hegde's integrity, Advani's approval notwithstanding, and Yeddy's culpability. I do not expect nor ask that you share my opinions, but given the leeway you seem to extend towards all non-BJP parties, your political inclination and lack of objectivity is obvious.
That is silly. Even Modi didn't buy it, why not ask him to agree first.The case against Yeddiyurappa was stopped not because the High court held him innocent but because they deemed he had not been given a chance to put forward his defence. A defence that does not exist, the decision of the high court only on technical grounds. The man got money from 2 mining firms, only the absolutely cussed would believe that the money was goven from the goodness of the hearts of those corporates which were suffering losses.
Integrity is not decided whether a case is uoheld or not. In that case all high court judges who have their decisions overturned by the Supreme court are, according to your logic, of suspect integrity. How Justice Hegde's integrity is viewed is seen by the Supreme Court going by those findings when it shut down mining. The same court asked him to look at suspected encounter cases in Manipur.
You are welcome to assume lack of objectivity if you want, I'm not inclined to labour that point with you. I have never suggested that I am purely objective on all matters, only that my objectivity or lack therof is not based on party lines. I have my likes & dislikes but unlike you, they are not based on whether the party line is being forwarded. I make no bones that I have & will defend decisions (that I agree with) of the Congress &/or others, just like I will defend those of the BJP . Depends on the decision, not on the party taking it.