Tiki Tam Tam
<b>MILITARY PROFESSIONALS</b>
- Joined
- May 15, 2006
- Messages
- 9,330
- Reaction score
- 0
So what? We like to do it more efficiently and cleanly compared to you. We make use of gunships and jets when we feel like, and I'm pretty sure you Indians would have done the same in Kashmir had the valley not been completely choked by a half a million of your own soldiers! And lets face it, you guys made use of pretty much every heavy weapon you had in Kargil and everyone knows that Pakistan's NLI were not the only ones fighting there...in fact far from it.
I dont know why but Indians consistantly display pictures of dead resistance members, I dont think its morally or technically allowed as per the Geneva Conventions either. If they say they do it for reasons of 'posterity' then funny how I dont see pictures of dead Indian officers and soldiers who die at pretty much an equal rate.
First of all chum, understand one thing - we do not use artillery or tanks against insurgents even if you are pretty and totally unsure.
That is why it took Kulwinder's arty bde get into the groove in from the infantry role to the arty role in Kargil and when they did, they were devastating!
Of course, you would in your dream say you won. That is why it is surprising that we are still where we are!!
If wishes were horses then beggars would ride!!
Much that you wish to delude yourself, but surprising isn't it that everyone, including Pakistani military commentators ( as posted in this forum itself) knew it was the NLI and SSG in action in Kargil.
Of course, as per your delusion, you won 1965, 1971 and Kargil. Indeed it is so, except the stupid world feel otherwise. Stupid, aren't they?
When you have no clue about the Geneva Convention or even warfare, is it not advisable to learn of it before contaminating the air?