Indian Navy's Lies Exposed

[Windjammer]

https://www.facebook.com/

@Areesh @snow lake @DESERT FIGHTER @Taimoor Khan

 

[Mrc]

That's neither any thing New or any thing to be ashamed of for them

 

[Mufflerman]

CJ Post. Congrats

 

[Adam WANG SHANGHAI MEGA]

Nothing can surprise when indians sink its own submarine by making its own history record on this planet

!!!!

 

[Assasin Ezio]

Source is CJ Post.

Nothing can surprise when indians sink its own submarine by making its own history record on this planet

!!!!

Total number of fatalities in all Indian Navy accidents combined since 2003 is less than the fatalities of Chinese navy personnel in a single accident alone (Chinese #361 submarine accident which killed 70 PLAN sailors).

 

[Adam WANG SHANGHAI MEGA]

Source is CJ Post.




Total number of fatalities in all Indian Navy accidents combined since 2003 is less than the fatalities of Chinese navy personnel in a single accident alone (Chinese #361 submarine accident which killed 70 PLAN sailors).

why since 2003，better since 1962, what is the fatalities in sino-india war care to show us ?

 

[Assasin Ezio]

why since 2003，better since 1962, what is the fatalities in sino-india war care to show us ?

Why since 1962, what is the fatalities in Korean war care to show us?

 

[Adam WANG SHANGHAI MEGA]

Sino -indian war Casualties and losses
Source wikipedia

Indian side:
1,383—3,250 killed
548—1,047 wounded
1,696 missing
3,968 captured

China side :
722 killed
1,697 wounded


Sino -indian war Casualties and losses
China official Source
Indian side:
4,885 killed
1047 wounded
3,968 captured

China side :
722 killed
1,697 wounded

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Bollywood nation.

 

[Adam WANG SHANGHAI MEGA]

Why since 1962, what is the fatalities in Korean war care to show us?

We defeated UN 17 nations led by USA,yes our fatalities was higher but we did not lose!!!!and USA did not win!!!\
When we entered north korea,USA army was approching Yalu rier,when the war is over, the Armistice Line stays over 38 line,you tell me who won ?

 

[Joe Shearer]

why since 2003，better since 1962, what is the fatalities in sino-india war care to show us ?

No.

We prefer since 2003. It makes some members making stupid points (not you; never you) look all the more stupid. We like it when some faces turn red.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

Source is CJ Post.




Total number of fatalities in all Indian Navy accidents combined since 2003 is less than the fatalities of Chinese navy personnel in a single accident alone (Chinese #361 submarine accident which killed 70 PLAN sailors).

But the India air force has enough to add...

 

[Joe Shearer]

But the India air force has enough to add...

Yes.

Flying the original versions of J-7 and F-7.

Flying the heavily-modified Chinese versions, there have been three deaths in the PAF already, in 2017. PLAAF fatalities are never publicised. We have no idea how many hundreds died in those.

 

[Imran Khan]

they want to be hero at any way

 

[SBUS-CXK]

Yes.

Flying the original versions of J-7 and F-7.

Flying the heavily-modified Chinese versions, there have been three deaths in the PAF already, in 2017. PLAAF fatalities are never publicised. We have no idea how many hundreds died in those.

yah, you are right, China is not open, not open, not open... So the real thing is that China crashes more than India aircraft.

In simple terms, when Chinese J-6 and type 59 tanks were at the Uganda-Tanzania war. India LCA and Arjun tank does not even exist. when China's J-7 and type 69 tank were at the Iran-Iraq war. India LCA and Arjun tank is just a paper. Still not simple enough? OK, a direct contrast....

India' LCA VS China' Q5, J-6, J-7, J-8, J-10, J-10B, J-10C, J-11, J-11B, J-15, J-16, J-20, J-31, JH-7, K-8, L-15, Y-5, Y-6, Y-7, Y-8, Y-20, H-6，H-6K, KJ-2000, KJ-500, Gaoxin 6, AG-600, C919....Some small production planes or transition models are not on the list（main：J-9, J-12, J-13, Y-10）. Oh, So sorry, I almost forgot, and JF-17.

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/the-real-gap-between-china-and-india.505673/

yah, China is not open...