Indian Navy's Lies Exposed

[Windjammer]

The video says authorities decided to investigate, but does not say which authority. Meaning source less or nameless. Only other authority we know is present in the neighborhood which claimed successful rescue of hostage while crossing the border and we know what happened to that claim.

I would put my dollar on any authority other than the weekend warriors blowing up fishing boats just to get attention.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

we asked for one line statistical number and you dumped the entire garbage.
Simply provide the number and be done with.

He doesn't have the number, and that's why he's being evasive.

I hope I explained the point of view clearly and in simple terms. Can someone take him on in this battle of attrition? He's playing,"Let's see how long you can keep up with my moronic behaviour and deliberate avoidance of the subject." I don't play that.




Have you even read my posts? I will happily talk to you if you have, and if there is anything of worth and of interest that you have to say. Smart one-liners and other undergraduate stuff is simply boring, unless there is some wit going out with them.

You want to know the difference between a single product and an industrial system?

India cannon.

Fake Chinese spares for indigenised Bofors guns

China cannon

Saudis Use Chinese-made Cannons in Yemen

@Joe Shearer You say India can make 1000 airplanes? Sorry, I don't know which Indian is lying. After all, it's in your genes and culture.

Indian Army ammunition won’t even last 10 days in event of a war, suggests CAG reports

 

[Maxpane]

 

[Joe Shearer]

You want to know the difference between a single product and an industrial system?

India cannon.

Fake Chinese spares for indigenised Bofors guns

China cannon

Saudis Use Chinese-made Cannons in Yemen

@Joe Shearer You say India can make 1000 airplanes? Sorry, I don't know which Indian is lying. After all, it's in your genes and culture.

Indian Army ammunition won’t even last 10 days in event of a war, suggests CAG reports

No.

I don't want to know the difference between a single product and an industrial system. I never wanted to know.

I want to know the accident rate of the PLAAF.

AND I want to see you quote where I claimed that India can make 1000 airplanes. Or an acknowledgement that lying is in your own genes and culture.

I'm sure you've seen the link. So your opinion doesn't hold water. I didn't avoid your question, but I couldn't translate these chinese links.

But ridiculous, an agricultural country, or an illiterate country, can't even make a qualified fighter. But he thinks he can make 1000 airplanes.

Doesn't it sound ridiculous that you present the evidence in Chinese links, but you can't yourself translate them? What value do they have? If you understand them, presumably you can present them in that understood form?

And I never claimed the 1000 airplanes. Could you show me where that was claimed? That is just your feeble attempt at diversion.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

No.

I don't want to know the difference between a single product and an industrial system. I never wanted to know.

I want to know the accident rate of the PLAAF.

AND I want to see you quote where I claimed that India can make 1000 airplanes. Or an acknowledgement that lying is in your own genes and culture.



Doesn't it sound ridiculous that you present the evidence in Chinese links, but you can't yourself translate them? What value do they have? If you understand them, presumably you can present them in that understood form?

And I never claimed the 1000 airplanes. Could you show me where that was claimed? That is just your feeble attempt at diversion.

Oh, it seems that you don't care about the aircraft accidents in India. Sorry, I forgot. This is not news in India. Yah, China has more aircraft accidents than India, but China is not open, yah, that's for sure.

I've learned from you —— why India uses the best parts to assemble the world's most rubbish aircraft.

 

[xyxmt]

ISI runs at least 100 CJ Post . Hard Work .

this must be the easiest job under taken by ISI

 

[Mugwop]

He doesn't have the number, and that's why he's being evasive.

I hope I explained the point of view clearly and in simple terms. Can someone take him on in this battle of attrition? He's playing,"Let's see how long you can keep up with my moronic behaviour and deliberate avoidance of the subject." I don't play that.




Have you even read my posts? I will happily talk to you if you have, and if there is anything of worth and of interest that you have to say. Smart one-liners and other undergraduate stuff is simply boring, unless there is some wit going out with them.

My one liner bothers you so much but the posts that bash indian navy or the lies and deception created by indian media to fool it's own masses doesn't even irk you?

Accidents happen all the time but their insecurity got the best of them hence such lies.

 

[Joe Shearer]

My one liner bothers you so much but the posts that bash indian navy or the lies and deception created by indian media to fool it's own masses doesn't even irk you?

Accidents happen all the time but their insecurity got the best of them hence such lies.

LOL.

Doesn't irk me? What was my contribution to this entire thread about? About transparency, or did I get it wrong. As far as lies and deception created by Indian media, my point was, and is, that they are among the most insubordinate and inquisitive in south Asia. If one of them lies, the others will trip that one up and expose it. I do not know if you have in mind any specific examples of their getting together to propagate the same lie, all at the same time.

 

[Joe Shearer]

I'm sure you've seen the link. So your opinion doesn't hold water. I didn't avoid your question, but I couldn't translate these chinese links.

But ridiculous, an agricultural country, or an illiterate country, can't even make a qualified fighter. But he thinks he can make 1000 airplanes.

How does showing a link which you yourself cannot translate mean anything? Kichhui jodi na bojho, kothopokothon'er ki dam roilo?

And who talked about making 1,000 airplanes?

Oh, it seems that you don't care about the aircraft accidents in India. Sorry, I forgot. This is not news in India. Yah, China has more aircraft accidents than India, but China is not open, yah, that's for sure.

I've learned from you —— why India uses the best parts to assemble the world's most rubbish aircraft.

You haven't learnt much from me. We care about aircraft accidents. We hold public enquiries. All accidents to our aircraft, rotary and fixed wing, are clearly visible in the media, available in public. You do not. You conceal all your problems. After all this back and forth discussion, you still aren't able to fulfil one single demand - that you display the accident statistics for Chinese assembled aircraft. Whether you have more accidents than India cannot be stated for certain, because you are not open.

Whether we make the world's most rubbish aircraft or not remains to be seen. We will know the truth the day you dare to reveal your figures.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

How does showing a link which you yourself cannot translate mean anything? Kichhui jodi na bojho, kothopokothon'er ki dam roilo?

And who talked about making 1,000 airplanes?

Sorry, this is my mistake. I use PLAAF to compare IAF.
IAF's victory is to announce the accident rate.
Great victory.

So it is not surprising. With the best parts assembled the most garbage aircraft.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

How does showing a link which you yourself cannot translate mean anything? Kichhui jodi na bojho, kothopokothon'er ki dam roilo?

And who talked about making 1,000 airplanes?



You haven't learnt much from me. We care about aircraft accidents. We hold public enquiries. All accidents to our aircraft, rotary and fixed wing, are clearly visible in the media, available in public. You do not. You conceal all your problems. After all this back and forth discussion, you still aren't able to fulfil one single demand - that you display the accident statistics for Chinese assembled aircraft. Whether you have more accidents than India cannot be stated for certain, because you are not open.

Whether we make the world's most rubbish aircraft or not remains to be seen. We will know the truth the day you dare to reveal your figures.

LOL. I really do not need to learn the logic of India, India does not care how to make a good plane, India does not even feel shame?

Announced the accident is to make better progress and improvement. This is to create better aircraft.

So ask - India published aircraft accident. (assuming China is not published) But the Indian LCA has any progress?

their navy is the laughing stock of the world, who remembers this herd US navy shows these pictures to the new recruits on how not to dock ships

Oh, but not surprising.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Sorry, this is my mistake. I use PLAAF to compare IAF.
IAF's victory is to announce the accident rate.
Great victory.

So it is not surprising. With the best parts assembled the most garbage aircraft.

I notice that you are still unable to answer a simple question.

LOL. I really do not need to learn the logic of India, India does not care how to make a good plane, India does not even feel shame?

Announced the accident is to make better progress and improvement. This is to create better aircraft.

So ask - India published aircraft accident. (assuming China is not published) But the Indian LCA has any progress?


Oh, but not surprising.

Yes.

The AESA kit has been tested and is due for installation. The advanced model of the engine has been tested, and will be installed in the near future.

And there are still no accidents. Hidden or otherwise.

And it still flies better than your faded carbon copies.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

I notice that you are still unable to answer a simple question.



Yes.

The AESA kit has been tested and is due for installation. The advanced model of the engine has been tested, and will be installed in the near future.

And there are still no accidents. Hidden or otherwise.

And it still flies better than your faded carbon copies.



Do you even have a dock? LOL.

Wow. after 33 years of efforts, LCA finally progress... In a possible future. This is the effort of 1000 aircraft crashes. and It is worth noting that these are the top aircraft —— SU-30，MIG, C-130...

Good, good, Finally reached the JF-17 level.

my faded carbon copies..

And India has abandoned T-50, this is true?

Do you even have a dock? LOL.

What you have?

In addition to the magic confidence....

 

[Joe Shearer]

Wow. after 33 years of efforts, LCA finally progress... In a possible future. This is the effort of 1000 aircraft crashes. and It is worth noting that these are the top aircraft —— SU-30，MIG, C-130...

Good, good, Finally reached the JF-17 level.

my faded carbon copies..

And India has abandoned T-50, this is true?


What you have?

View attachment 434492

In addition to the magic confidence....

Have you found and translated the statistics yet?

LOL.

I'm beginning to enjoy this.

Oh, by the way, since our discussion is about transparency in statistics, there have been 6 Su 30 crashes (out of 240 aircraft); five of them were due to mechanical failures beyond the scope of maintenance.

Wow. after 33 years of efforts, LCA finally progress... In a possible future. This is the effort of 1000 aircraft crashes. and It is worth noting that these are the top aircraft —— SU-30，MIG, C-130...

Good, good, Finally reached the JF-17 level.

my faded carbon copies..

And India has abandoned T-50, this is true?


What you have?

View attachment 434492

Heh.

Do you really not know the difference between docks and ships?

You must be the local expert!

In addition to the magic confidence....

 

[SBUS-CXK]

Have you found and translated the statistics yet?

LOL.

I'm beginning to enjoy this.

Oh, by the way, since our discussion is about transparency in statistics, there have been 6 Su 30 crashes (out of 240 aircraft); five of them were due to mechanical failures beyond the scope of maintenance.



Heh.

Do you really not know the difference between docks and ships?

You must be the local expert!

India's statistics must be "transparent"! Because India wants to buy it again, it can get rebates.

And India has abandoned T-50, this is true?

Have you found and translated the statistics yet?

LOL.

I'm beginning to enjoy this.

Oh, by the way, since our discussion is about transparency in statistics, there have been 6 Su 30 crashes (out of 240 aircraft); five of them were due to mechanical failures beyond the scope of maintenance.



Heh.

Do you really not know the difference between docks and ships?

You must be the local expert!

Sorry, I really don't know India has dock. I think the Indian imports dock.