Indian Missiles are Superior to Chinese in Quality, Says Experts

[Aramsogo]

LOL, Indians claiming 6 to 8 times the accuracy of latest Russian Bulava missile...

MissileThreat :: SS-NX-30

 

[Manas]

You may have heard about it, I have read the MTCR..
Do you see the countless loopholes in it to exploit..

Also.. knowledge and items are two different things.
Education in the hows and whys..
exact blueprints.. etc.
All help in making something.

Dont get me wrong.. Indian ingenuity had a lot to play in it..
But had a lot of Russian know-how to push it along.
Where the MTCR was not violated..
You get systems like the brahmos.

We are taking about indian missile visa vis chinese missile , are n't we ??

While indians surely have some russian assistance , then Chiese received much larger and much longer Soviet/Russian assistance since the 60s when they started building nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles.

Indian nuclear weapon program was by far indigenous and spun off from the civilian nuclear program pioneered by Dr Homi Bhaba.
Similarly our missile program that started in mid 80s drew technical knowhow from our space program by ISRO .The Agni missile is actually based on a American Rocket, indian scientist APJ Kalam had the opportunity to study at NASA on a academic stay.

So yes we had some assistance from outside , but they are comparatively less than what other countries e,g china received from Russia ,and also from the west. Whatever assistance we got it was transparent and legal. We didn't blatantly copy weapons imported and sell it as our product like the Chinese do .

And Brohmos isn't just made by Russian assistance ,but its a fullfledged joint venture between india and Russia.We can't sell it other countries or use its technology in other weapon systems without the assent of Russia.

 

[Screambowl]

LOL, Indians claiming 6 to 8 times the accuracy of latest Russian Bulava missile...

MissileThreat :: SS-NX-30

it not a claim. It is an experimental value which came out visually as seen by the IN frigates stationed near the ground 0 where the RV fell. understand???

mean while Bulava is an another type of an ICBM(Quasi)

 

[JayAtl]

fact that the only technology that could not be hidden as they do with other hardware from being benchmarked internationally- proves to be shoddy and piece of garbage. i.e. you can't hide your subs... China’s Noisy Subs Get Busier — And Easier to Track China's Noisy Subs Get Busier -- And Easier to Track | Danger Room | Wired.com - tells us that the meme that Chinese quality is 20 years behind Indian hardware is true.

 

[Aramsogo]

it not a claim. It is an experimental value which came out visually as seen by the IN frigates stationed near the ground 0 where the RV fell. understand???

mean while Bulava is an another type of an ICBM(Quasi)

Where is the re-entry video if India is so good and 8 times better than the Russians.
What quasi ICBM?? Bulava has more range than anything Indian.

Ahahahhahahahah!!!!!

 

[rcrmj]

fact that the only technology that could not be hidden as they do with other hardware from being benchmarked internationally- proves to be shoddy and piece of garbage. i.e. you can't hide your subs... China’s Noisy Subs Get Busier — And Easier to Track China's Noisy Subs Get Busier -- And Easier to Track | Danger Room | Wired.com - tells us that the meme that Chinese quality is 20 years behind Indian hardware is true.

clueless thing, do not divert the topic, its about Indian's primitive ICBM technology (but labeled as superior one by an Indian 'expert') now you are trying to laugh at Chinese subs``can india even produce subs? the reality is no```then let me lower the standard, can indian even produce rifles and bullets? the answer is no too

if the India 'quality' is 20 years 'ahead' China then why there is '0' india's 'super doper' harderware in world's capital goods industry? and again the reality is neil``not to mention your sorry country is importing all sorts of Chinese hardwares to keep your primitive manufacturing and service industries (call centers) working`

 

[chauism]

it not a claim. It is an experimental value which came out visually as seen by the IN frigates stationed near the ground 0 where the RV fell. understand???

mean while Bulava is an another type of an ICBM(Quasi)

Bulava is a true ICBM, it just can opt to fly in a Quasi ballastic trajectory.

 

[JayAtl]

clueless thing, do not divert the topic, its about Indian's primitive ICBM technology (but labeled as superior one by an Indian 'expert') now you are trying to laugh at Chinese subs``can india even produce subs? the reality is no```then let me lower the standard, can indian even produce rifles and bullets? the answer is no too

if the India 'quality' is 20 years 'ahead' China then why there is '0' india's 'super doper' harderware in world's capital goods industry? and again the reality is neil``not to mention your sorry country is importing all sorts of Chinese hardwares to keep your primitive manufacturing and service industries (call centers) working`

and here I thought Chinese claimed to have a high IQ. the question was not about indigenous production or home made systems in my claim. My claim was about quality in addition to the claim made in the article . Even a child would be able to deduct that when your own chief says china is 20 years behind western military technology and those same western countries offer their top systems to India. then the quality of Indian hardware/ inventory is 20 times better than yours. and yes India is making its subs which would be better than your noisy tin pots. you should be happy india is importing small stuff from china. its helps with population control in china , after all more people are forced into hard labor camps and more go the* cough * foxconn way

 

[Aramsogo]

abey chuu**** ... there is a difference between a Quasi BM and BM. What Russian Tested is a quasi BM and the only Quasi BM in that range.

Come to India go to DRDO ask for it. Simple.

Bulava is the most advanced Russian missile. This is 65+ years of missile experience. Only Indians high on rocket fume claim Agni is better.

 

[breeze]

Indian claiming 'superiority' is the equivalent of Sub-Saharan African claiming civilization. Laughable.

 

[Manas]

The CEP of Chinese missiles was added in by an edit with no references.

Indeed, the fact of the matter is, China tested its first ICBM in the 1970's. We had a 40 year head start. Do you really, really think that China, with a rocket success record just as good as the US, has worse guidance systems?

This is utter illogical.

India is tested its first ICBM in 2012 ,doesn't mean the technology is of 1960s .Its like saying since LCA is our first fighter jet ,so technology wise it'll be the same as Mig-21 built in the 60s.

India has been launching rockets since the 70s and have very well developed space program and its current rockets/missiles are among best in their class.

 

[chauism]

and here I thought Chinese claimed to have a high IQ. the question was not about indigenous production or home made systems in my claim. My claim was about quality in addition to the claim made in the article . Even a child would be able to deduct that when your own chief says china is 20 years behind western military technology and those same western countries offer their top systems to India. then the quality of Indian hardware/ inventory is 20 times better than yours. and yes India is making its subs which would be better than your noisy tin pots

Those Subs in the article are Han class SSN, China had them for 40 years already, and no one said that they are quite. Again where is your nuclear sub?

 

[Screambowl]

Bulava is a true ICBM, it just can opt to fly in a Quasi ballastic trajectory.

dude i think you cannot differentiate things.

Bulava It is Mirved, has a greater range than Agni.


no comparison

Agni5 non mirved version is tested, has a range 5000kms-5500kms

this clarifies your CEP problem.



There are two more test to be done.

 

[Aramsogo]

and here I thought Chinese claimed to have a high IQ. the question was not about indigenous production or home made systems in my claim. My claim was about quality in addition to the claim made in the article . Even a child would be able to deduct that when your own chief says china is 20 years behind western military technology and those same western countries offer their top systems to India. then the quality of Indian hardware/ inventory is 20 times better than yours. and yes India is making its subs which would be better than your noisy tin pots. you should be happy india is importing small stuff from chian. its helps with population control in china , after all more people are forced into hard labor camps and more jump off roofs * cough * foxconn

US doesn't sell strategic weapons to India. The Slurpee is for Americans only.

 

[chauism]

abey chuu**** ... there is a difference between a Quasi BM and BM. What Russian Tested is a quasi BM and the only Quasi BM in that range.

Come to India go to DRDO ask for it. Simple.

The only difference is the trajectory, but the guidiance and flight control technology is still the same.