Indian govt 'aggressively' developing infrastructures near LAC to counter Chinese aggression

[SIPRA]

I take positive way that local people are beneficial here.....

Of course.

Otherwise, I was joking. Because, I am of the view that probability of a major war between China and India is extremely low.

 

[undercover JIX]

Of course.

Otherwise, I was joking. Because, I am of the view that probability of a major war between China and India is extremely low.

would you be kind enough to share the reasons ?, Please

 

[SIPRA]

would you be kind enough to share the reasons ?, Please

For a major war to start, one state has to attack the other one.

India may have a wish, but has neither will, nor courage, nor capacity to attack China. Besides, India knows that it's claim on Aksai Chin is highly dubious. Aksai Chin, otherwise, also has hardly any strategic or economic significance for India.

China has the capacity and capability, but no cogent reason to attack India. China already has the territory, it actually wants to retain.

China will only attack India, if it establishes that India is going to pose a serious threat to it's security, in near future. That condition also doesn't seem to occur in foreseeable future.

That is the summary of my opinion.

 

[undercover JIX]

For a major war to start, one state has to attack the other one.

India may have a wish, but has neither will, nor courage, nor capacity to attack China. Besides, India knows that it's claim on Aksai Chin is highly dubious. Aksai Chin, otherwise, also has hardly any strategic or economic significance for India.

China has the capacity and capability, but no cogent reason to attack India. China already has the territory, it actually wants to retain.

China will only attack India, if it establishes that India is going to pose a serious threat to it's security, in near future. That condition also doesn't seem to occur in foreseeable future.

That is the summary of my opinion.

aina serious??? bas bol dena tha na kay cheeni khofzada hai Modi se, Vedic Supa Powa koi choti bala nai

 

[SIPRA]

aina serious??? bas bol dena tha na kay cheeni khofzada hai Modi se, Vedic Supa Powa koi choti bala nai

Chinese are scared of 56" size black-hole of Modi Jee.

A black-hole has such a gravitational pull, that any thing, crossing it's event horizon, cannot escape it, not even EM radiation.

 

[walterbibikow]

For a major war to start, one state has to attack the other one.

India may have a wish, but has neither will, nor courage, nor capacity to attack China. Besides, India knows that it's claim on Aksai Chin is highly dubious. Aksai Chin, otherwise, also has hardly any strategic or economic significance for India.

China has the capacity and capability, but no cogent reason to attack India. China already has the territory, it actually wants to retain.

China will only attack India, if it establishes that India is going to pose a serious threat to it's security, in near future. That condition also doesn't seem to occur in foreseeable future.

That is the summary of my opinion.

Have you studied from where the Chinese troops are going to come-up from? What is the depth of their rear bases relative to their LAC position?

And similarly, the nature of Indian positions on LAC and supporting positions towards rear?

The main Chinese bases are quite a distance from LAC and any surge in troops will have to travel in a long convoy over some distance. Can this movement be hidden?

Secondly, Indian positions in the Tawang Sector tend to have an interlocking nature

Because of terrain the bases are located at regular distance in form of sort of a chain

Indian bases are mutually reinforcing

Once the Chinese have surged to the plateau, they are stuck here w/o any follow-on support

 

[undercover JIX]

Chinese are scared of 56" size black-hole of Modi Jee.

A black-hole has such a gravitational pull, that any thing, crossing it's event horizon, cannot escape it, not even EM radiation.

Uncle Uncle ye Gravitational Pull or Suction Power mae kiya farq hota hai?

hmmmm, escape tunnel and your explanation makes sense, Hindu Rashtra knows how powerful that event could be, 56"

 

[SIPRA]

Have you studied from where the Chinese troops are going to come-up from? What is the depth of their rear bases relative to their LAC position?

And similarly, the nature of Indian positions on LAC and supporting positions towards rear?

The main Chinese bases are quite a distance from LAC and any surge in troops will have to travel in a long convoy over some distance. Can this movement be hidden?
View attachment 907159

Secondly, Indian positions in the Tawang Sector tend to have an interlocking nature

Because of terrain the bases are located at regular distance in form of sort of a chain

Indian bases are mutually reinforcing

Once the Chinese have surged to the plateau, they are stuck here w/o any follow-on support

Mairay Bhai: Jub yudh hona he naheen, tau man apna waqt details main kyun waste karoon.

 

[Trango Towers]

aina serious??? bas bol dena tha na kay cheeni khofzada hai Modi se, Vedic Supa Powa koi choti bala nai

Shrarti batcha

 

[walterbibikow]

Mairay Bhai: Jub yudh hona he naheen, tau man apna waqt details main kyun waste karoon.

China can at best employ about 130-160 aircrafts due to the severe limitations of air bases in Himalayas. Out of the 7 airfields it has, none except Lhasa is able to house a full squadron. Tibet has 4 air bases, out of which only Ngari is close to Ladakh. The other 3- Shigatse, Lhasa and Nyingchi are 1500 to 2500 kms away. All the 4 Tibet bases are at a high altitude of more than 4000 meters, effectively reducing their weapon load and range by half, and making them visible to an enemy with a high performance AEWCS platform. Xinjiang air bases are at a medium altitude of 1300-1600 meters, but are farther than the Ngari air base, between 300 to 700 kms from the Pangong area. The J-20 has no support infrastructure in Tibet or Xinjiang and will have to operate out of Chengdu which is 4000 kms away from Ladakh and will need multiple refuelling. That will make it vulnerable to India’s NETRA AEWC

 

[Raj-Hindustani]

For a major war to start, one state has to attack the other one.

India may have a wish, but has neither will, nor courage, nor capacity to attack China. Besides, India knows that it's claim on Aksai Chin is highly dubious. Aksai Chin, otherwise, also has hardly any strategic or economic significance for India.

China has the capacity and capability, but no cogent reason to attack India. China already has the territory, it actually wants to retain.

China will only attack India, if it establishes that India is going to pose a serious threat to it's security, in near future. That condition also doesn't seem to occur in foreseeable future.

That is the summary of my opinion.

You are talking the same way, the way many Indians talk about india vs Pakistan war..

Mostly say that we have capability and can run over, can get the pak kashmir and GB....

But practically, at what cost china will? A full flesh war where their all cities will be on nuclear missiles range? And why would do such blunder?

India position is same as Pakistan against India...

 

[applesauce]

This didn't make sense to me. I think one war comes under China's Eastern theater command and the other under Northern or Western theater command.

If the Chinese ever want to reclam Taiwan, than India's is their least of worries. They have to worry about defeating a potential alliance of the US + Japan + Australia + UK and possibly NATO (per it's charter about one country's conflict is everyone's) and then India.

no.
an indian invasion over the himalayas simply will not be able to tie up many PLA troops due the nature of the terrain. and even if india managed to push, they wouldn't get far and wouldn't hit any areas that would seriously hinder a taiwan war(there being not much of strategic value in tibet other than the land itself). plus a war over taiwan would be mostly air and naval leaving large parts of the army twiddling their thumbs. also china has never had a shortage of volunteers, even when it had 5 million+ active in the army, never mind now and especially if they are fighting japan, taking taiwan or in a defensive war against india.

 

[khansaheeb]

1https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1712228/china-india-war-tawang-arunachal-pradesh-narendra-modi-ladakh

​

Discount codes Puzzles Horoscopes Express Rated Shop Paper
LOGINREGISTER

9°C
Find us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterFind us on Instagram

China 'preparing for war' as India confirms ‘unprecedented’ troop deployment along border​

Thousands more troops have been deployed along the so-called Line of Actual control (LAC).​

By CIARAN MCGRATH
11:37, Wed, Dec 21, 2022 | UPDATED: 11:56, Wed, Dec 21, 2022
95

India-China tensions: Expert on potential military clashes​

0 seconds of 1 minute, 50 secondsVolume 90%










SUBSCRIBE
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
China is "preparing for war" with India, senior Indian opposition figure Rahul Gandhi in the light of the recent spike in animosity. Meanwhile, New Delhi is drawing a line in the sand with Beijing by unveiling plans for a 1,000-mile road along its border with China, days after troops from the world’s two most populous nations slugged it out in more brutal clashes.

RELATED ARTICLES​

• Harry and Meghan's jet use questioned as Thunberg appears in clip
• Meghan and Harry’s Netflix show 'backfires' as US turns on couple

The two-lane “frontier highway”, stretching along the border throughout the disputed Arunachal Pradesh, a northeastern Indian state, will be completed by 2027, according to reports.

The revelation comes a day after Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, India’s defence minister, confirming he was deploying thousands of troops along the border after what he called an “encroachment” by PLA troops which he blamed for the skirmishes in Tawang earlier this month.
During the clashes, on December 9, 21 Chinese soldiers and nine from India were hurt, with senior Indian Army figures having claimed the PLA forces have regularly entered Indian territory in recent months.
The planned road will also stop nomadic Chinese herdsmen from crossing into Indian territory and building settlements.

Indian Army soldiers are pictured on a Bofors gun near the LAC (Image: GETTY)

Rahul Gandhi has claimed China is "preparing for war" (Image: GETTY)
PLA troops have been accused of using the herdsmen as a pretext to cross the border themselves.
Beijing has simultaneously been building infrastructure on its side of the border, known as the Line of Actual Control, including major roads, heliports and airstrips.
In a further illustration of escalating tensions, New Delhi also earlier this week tested its Agni-V nuclear-capable strategic missile, which has a range of more than 4,000 miles, off India’s eastern coast.
China and India fought a brief war in 1962, and tensions have simmered ever since.
JUST IN: Heartwarming moment injured Ukraine soldier reunited with toddler

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi (Image: Getty)

China's President Xi Jinping (Image: Getty)

RELATED ARTICLES​

• Ukraine LIVE: US set to offer $1.8m in military aid including Patriots
• Gender switch law will let Scottish 15-year-olds start process

Beijing continues to claim Arunachal Pradesh lies within its territory, arguing it had historically been part of South Tibet in China.
In June of last year, PLA troops killed a minimum of 20 Indian soldiers in during brutal hand-to-hand combat in the western Indian union territory of Ladakh, described at the time as “medieval” by Tobias Ellwood, chairman of Parliament’s defence committee.
India has roughly 200,000 troops stationed along the border.
Describing Indian troop numbers in the region as “unprecedented”, Mr Jaishankar yesterday said: “Today we have a deployment of the Indian army on the China border that we have never had.
“It is done in order to counter Chinese deployment, which has which has been scaled up massively since 2020.”
DON'T MISS
War spills into Russia as Putin claims 'US-made missiles' downed [LIVE BLOG]
Lukashenko labels himself and Putin as most 'harmful' people on Earth [INSIGHT]
Sunak hits back and says UK 'not a racist country' after Sussex claims [VIDEO]

India: More Indian troops have been deployed in Arunachal Pradesh (Image: Getty)

TRENDING​

• Furious backlash as Biden prepares to appoint Joe Kennedy to NI role
• Andrew Bridgen suspended from Parliament after breaching MPs' rules
• China 'preparing for war' as India confirms troops build-up

Previously Mr Gandhi, leader of the opposition Congress party, accused President Narendra Modi’s government of being in denial about the risks involved, adding: “It is very clear that China is preparing for war.
“The government is trying to hide and ignore the obvious threat.”

By contrast, China has said little about recent events, with Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin saying on December 13: “As far as we understand, the China-India border situation is stable overall.”
The two sides “maintained unobstructed dialogue on the border issue through diplomatic and military channels”, Mr Wenbin said.
Beijing also called on New Delhi to “earnestly implement the important consensus reached by both leaders, strictly abide by the spirit of the agreements and accords signed by both sides, and together uphold the peace and tranquility of the China-India border region”.

You are talking the same way, the way many Indians talk about india vs Pakistan war..

Mostly say that we have capability and can run over, can get the pak kashmir and GB....

But practically, at what cost china will? A full flesh war where their all cities will be on nuclear missiles range? And why would do such blunder?

India position is same as Pakistan against India...

Denazification of India is long due.

 

[SIPRA]

You are talking the same way, the way many Indians talk about india vs Pakistan war..

Mostly say that we have capability and can run over, can get the pak kashmir and GB....

But practically, at what cost china will? A full flesh war where their all cities will be on nuclear missiles range? And why would do such blunder?

India position is same as Pakistan against India...

I don't gather, from your post, whether you are agreeing with my post or contradicting it.

I have made certain claims in my post. I may respond and clarify, if you raise objection, specific to any of those claims.

 

[Horse_Rider]

no.
an indian invasion over the himalayas simply will not be able to tie up many PLA troops due the nature of the terrain. and even if india managed to push, they wouldn't get far and wouldn't hit any areas that would seriously hinder a taiwan war(there being not much of strategic value in tibet other than the land itself). plus a war over taiwan would be mostly air and naval leaving large parts of the army twiddling their thumbs. also china has never had a shortage of volunteers, even when it had 5 million+ active in the army, never mind now and especially if they are fighting japan, taking taiwan or in a defensive war against india.

You are saying what I said essentially. What theater command India comes under? Western or Northern?