What's new

Indian explosives found in Syria!!!

American M4s and Russian RPGs along with Chinese AK 56s were also found in Syria.

Surprise surprise.

NOT !
 
Just like Pakistani toothpastes were found at the scene of 26/11-

Enough prove to blame a country and send dossiers- No?-

One has to be an idiot to think the dossier was based on toothpaste! Even a peebrain would know as part of evidence gathering police record everything found at crime scene and it becomes part of wider body of evidence. Hence it was shared with Pakistan, only for pakistani terrorist fanboys to start splashing their mindset by making idiotic conslusions.

Why is it that for some pakistanis every thread is an opportunity to offer apologies for their state's terrorism.
 
there is another video on youtube- where a terrorist spoked live to a indian news channel- see if you can find it-
his accent was pure indian-

No Indian say Kiraya as Karaya.
 
Just like Pakistani toothpastes were found at the scene of 26/11-

Enough prove to blame a country and send dossiers- No?-


Toothpaste..with Guns..with GPS Phones...with Mobile Phones...with bullets...Hand Grenades and Of course a 9 dead and one alive terrorist...

And when was the last time India imported Toothpaste from Pakistan legally.
 
Indian made explosive material which is exported to the world is being used to kill people by terrorists.

Indian can not be exempted from the after affects of its dangerous export material.

Either India should initiate measures to control the usage of this dangerous material elsewhere in the world, or its export to other countries be banned by international community.

Go cry river or request your dads to impose a ban.
 
Once the shipment has landed the ownership of the explosives rest with the importer ...its their responsibility to ensure safety and security of the item they have exported. Its a legal export that was stolen from importers storage .how is India liable for that.

Because the material is produced in India and India sells it to countries which can not ensure proper safeguards. Therefore either India ensures that the country it sells the material to is a responsible state which should ensure the safety of the material and does not use it for the purpose of terrorism, or should stop the export as a responsible nation.

It can not just say that it is not India's responsibility because it is not India but another country which uses Indian exports to kill people.

Go cry river or request your dads to impose a ban.

Shut up tinker-head. When you do not have the knowledge to understand and comment on a topic, stay out.
 
Because the material is produced in India and India sells it to countries which can not ensure proper safeguards. Therefore either India ensures that the country it sells the material to is a responsible state which should ensure the safety of the material and does not use it for the purpose of terrorism, or should stop the export as a responsible nation.

It can not just say that it is not India's responsibility because it is not India but another country which uses Indian exports to kill people.

International Shipment rules are simple... once the shipment is at importers destination ..its his responsibility..if he was not competent to take care of the shipment he should not have ordered the same.
 
Because the material is produced in India and India sells it to countries which can not ensure proper safeguards. Therefore either India ensures that the country it sells the material to is a responsible state which should ensure the safety of the material and does not use it for the purpose of terrorism, or should stop the export as a responsible nation.

It can not just say that it is not India's responsibility because it is not India but another country which uses Indian exports to kill people.

Important question is who is diverting our exports towards a civil conflict. Till now neither Assad regime or the FSA have accused India of meddling. Its Iran,Turkey, West and Arab countries that are blamed for involvement in Syria.
 
There is a difference between sale of weapons and war like material to other nations. These are sold as per the existing and mutually agreed norms.

Acquisition of weapons like AK-47 and RPGs etc is also a different matter and is illegal under international law. There are conventions which deal with such aspects and those who violate the norms are punished.

However, when industrial material being sold for peaceful purposes is used for terrorism, it also involves not only the nation to whom such a material is sold but also the nation selling such a material. India in this case must also ensure that it only sells to a country which can ensure proper safeguards and seeks an assurance from the country to whom it sells that they would not use it for any other purpose than such a material is sold for.

If India can not ensure this, it should stop selling this material to that particular country. And if India refuses to do this, ban on such Indian exports may be imposed.

International Shipment rules are simple... once the shipment is at importers destination ..its his responsibility..if he was not competent to take care of the shipment he should not have ordered the same.

Export of dangerous materials do not fall under normal international export norms.
 
There is a difference between sale of weapons and war like material to other nations. These are sold as per the existing and mutually agreed norms.

Acquisition of weapons like AK-47 and RPGs etc is also a different matter and is illegal under international law. There are conventions which deal with such aspects and those who violate the norms are punished.

However, when industrial material being sold for peaceful purposes is used for terrorism, it also involves not only the nation to whom such a material is sold but also the nation selling such a material. India in this case must also ensure that it only sells to a country which can ensure proper safeguards and seeks an assurance from the country to whom it sells that they would not use it for any other purpose than such a material is sold for.

If India can not ensure this, it should stop selling this material to that particular country. And if India refuses to do this, ban on such Indian exports may be imposed.
Bhai sahab ek baat batao....Maine apko gadi bechi....woh gadi tumhare ghar se chori ho gayi aur chor ne kisi ko us gadi se maar diya toh kya woh meri jimewari hai...

I sell you a car ...it gets stolen from your house..and the thief kills someone with it...is it my responsibility....should I be held responsible for the sale of the car to a person who was not competent enough to ensure safety of the car in his home...

Who knows how this explosive landed in Syria...may be some one stole it from other country and then smuggled it to Siriya....

Till now I have not seen a news item regarding this anywhere else on the internet....may be the news is fake itself.
 
Important question is who is diverting our exports towards a civil conflict. Till now neither Assad regime or the FSA have accused India of meddling. Its Iran,Turkey, West and Arab countries that are blamed for involvement in Syria.

Sooner than later concerns on such aspects will be raised. Either India is complacent, or it is in cohorts with these countries or it is directly involved - such concerns would be raised.

India as a responsible nation must ensure that its dangerous material exports must not be used by terrorists to kill people. India can not stay out of the blame, when it knowingly sells and exports dangerous material to countries which may be supporting or fueling a war in another country which results in killings of innocent human beings. .
 
May be these are fake copies made in China and exported to syria to give bad name to India, no?
May be these are fake copies of Pakistani explosives made in China and exported to syria to give bad name to India, no? :P
 
Bhai sahab ek baat batao....Maine apko gadi bechi....woh gadi tumhare ghar se chori ho gayi aur chor ne kisi ko us gadi se maar diya toh kya woh meri jimewari hai...

I sell you a car ...it gets stolen from your house..and the thief kills someone with it...is it my responsibility....should I be held responsible for the sale of the car to a person who was not competent enough to ensure safety of thew car in his home...

Who know how this explosive landed in Syria...may be some one stole it from other country and then smuggled it to Siriya....

Till now I have not seen a news item regarding this anywhere else on the internet....may be the news is fake itself.

There is a difference between selling and exporting chemicals which could be used by terrorists in killing innocent human beings or fueling wars elsewhere.
 
None of these idiots know what they are talking about. One is saying those explosives were used by Syrian regime, the original report from where he stole those images says they were used by the rebels, then there are self made international trade lawyers who can not tell which law or which resolution or sanction was not complied with, and the all pervasive toothpaste logic walla terrorism apologists who will win mental gymnastics event at paralympics anyday, and there's that victimhood specialist who claims the explosive grading should be changed to grade 1 because its a conspiracy againt one side of muslims in syria, he's not sure which!!!

Its easy to tell when they are lying - their lips move.
 
Back
Top Bottom