What's new

Indian Diplomat's Take On: Pakistan's Yemen War

And are they senior in real life? Do they have a military position or a diplomatic or even a say in our policies in real life?

Damn someone online says something and you people start going nuts? THAT is cheap and easy!!!

Again..you are shooting the messenger...Just observe the thread relating to this topic, you will find more support for Pakistan to allign with SA and Gulf states rather than to not to allign with them...
 
Wrong.

Push for Pakistan's membership in coalition is coming from military itself. Your service chiefs are regularly registering attendance at House of Saud.
Simply saying wrong, and making a useless comment doesn't change reality. There is plenty of evidence that the military is not eager to just go in guns blazing.
 
Simply saying wrong, and making a useless comment doesn't change reality. There is plenty of evidence that the military is not eager to just go in guns blazing.
What evidence? I am not being sarcastic, just asking a question.
 
What evidence? I am not being sarcastic, just asking a question.
The fact that the military has kept quiet about this and left it to the political leadership, or the fact that there is major opposition to getting involved with Yemen. The current internal security situation will not allow the military to get involved with Saudi's war in Yemen, it's as simple as that.

The military has traditionally not moved to conduct operations until a political consensus in the country has been reached, and no consensus has been reached as of yet.
 
The fact that the military has kept quiet about this and left it to the political leadership, or the fact that there is major opposition to getting involved with Yemen. The current internal security situation will not allow the military to get involved with Saudi's war in Yemen, it's as simple as that.

The military has traditionally not moved to conduct operations until a political consensus in the country has been reached, and no consensus has been reached as of yet.
So the main evidence is that the military hasn't said anything yet? Well that could change, Pak is certainly very beholden to Saudi in many ways. Anyways, let's wait and see what comes of all thus :)
 
So the main evidence is that the military hasn't said anything yet? Well that could change, Pak is certainly very beholden to Saudi in many ways. Anyways, let's wait and see what comes of all thus :)
Sometimes the best way to say something is to say nothing. The military is leaving it to the political leadership, but I can guarantee you that they've already expressed their reluctance to Nawaz in secret.
 
The number of Indians occupying post space on such threads is really astonishing!

Come on ....Do not you know how much love we have for you!!!!!!!!!!!!....That is why we are there where ever you go...:yahoo:
 
Hi,

Please excuse me for my limited knowledge here, I am nothing but a humble guy here

Unique terms used especially in one sentence isnt what I am used to


Hi,
so Nukes getting into hands of fanatic Mullah is far more worse, right ?
Indeed, and perhaps that's why the political power of clergy has been bounded to a limit by their creators.
 
The funny thing is, when US ordered Pakistan in 1991 to be part of Operation Desert Storm, Pakistan immediately complied and sent Pakistani soldiers on the mission to attack Iraq.

This guy is lying that they did not help Iran because they had a "policy" to be neutral. Lying through his teeth. Shamelessly.

indeed,there is no muslim identity only cultural identity.

muslims can indeed find common ground despite being from different countries but the country always comes first if not biradari.

Perhaps the State should get control over terrorists who want to cause sectarian conflict in Pakistan. Then perhaps the Shia in Pakistan will rather than themselves engaging against the State will support the State?

Perhaps you should visit Lebanon? Well, not now, most of the country is filled with refugees.



You're wrong, the Saudi's requested Pakistani troops, while Pakistan considered the request the Saudis had second guesses over their combat effectiveness against Saddam's 8-year hardened troops, the Saudis then went to the US.

And Pakistan did send troops but only in a symbolic measure, they were deployed to relieve Saudi troops guarding the Yemen border.

Listen to this guy --> @Daneshmand

Fact of the matter is that Pakistan is a sunni muslim state,they are bound by religious diktat to be on the side of saudi arabia and Iran knows it very very well.

So all this talk of not taking sides is sheer lies,India is the country which truly doesnt take sides even when we were much closer to the USSR ,we only tried to make peace and we were never obliged to fight someone else's war.
 
I understand that in ancient Athens, any man in debt wasn't allowed to vote in the assembly because he wasn't considered free. What is true for an individual is also true for a society or a country - if you are indebted to someone, your actions aren't really going to be your own. The Greek debt issue that's playing out in Europe is a modern day confirmation of the same principle - an indebted government doesn't really have the freedom to decide its policies and actions.

So the question really is, whether Pakistan is indebted to the Saudi monarchy - in form of cheap oil, soft loans and aid. If so, then I guess the Pakistani government/armed forces don't really have a choice in the matter. Hoping this isn't the case. I guess we are going to find out after 6 April.
 
Yemen crises has posed again a catch 22 situation for Pakistan. If Pakistan say no , then it is saying no to one of the most enduring partnership. Saudi would not forget this event because they are left alone by USA already to tackle it's own mess.(Only intelligence support).If say Yes, then Pakistan is getting embroiled into yet another's war which can run into couple of years.

We Indian surely loving this.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom