What's new

Indian Army warns Rs 40,000 crore Arunachal border road could be a liability if tensions break out

Kao Boy

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 22, 2015
Messages
586
Reaction score
-4
Country
India
Location
India
With the Army raising fears that its proximity to China could make it a liability in case of a confrontation. The objection has irked the state government, and the matter could end up in a tussle between the home and defence ministries.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Act East Policy, pushing for development in the neglected Northeastern states, could be severely affected now the Army is opposing the mega road project, which costs between Rs 30,000 and Rs 40,000 crore and would connect Tawang with Vijoynagar, bordering Myanmar.

While initial construction between Tawang and Dirang is done, the work ahead is yet to begin, sources said.

Sources said local leaders from the state will be writing a protest letter to the prime minister.

“The matter has been brought to my knowledge and I will call a meeting of officials from home and defence ministry along with state officials to sort out the issues,” said Kiren Rijiju, Minister of State for Home Affairs, who also represents Arunachal Pradesh.

The Army is sticking to the old tactic of not developing border areas to ensure minimal damage and to cut off easy access for the enemy in case of an infiltration. However, this creates hurdles in the home ministry’s plan to develop remote areas and resettle the local population.

Sources said that since there is no infrastructure, locals have been pushed as far as 50 km from the border, posing a threat from Chinese forces who could claim it to be their territory in the event of a face-off.

The road has also been planned considering the large-scale migration of people from border areas and the need to push them back by creating all basic amenities.

“They should be happy that the road is close to the border. It can be a boon for the troops for swift mobilisation,” said an official.

Pasang Dorjee, an MLA from Arunachal Pradesh, said the Army is creating hurdles for the road project that will affect development in the area.

“Instead of saying that the road should be closer to the border, like China did, the Army is saying it should not be along the border.”

While the lack of infrastructure and roads on the Indian side has been an old grievance for the locals, the situation across the border is completely different.

“Chinese forces have top-class roads till their border outposts. The villages and towns are well inhabited and have excellent infrastructure. If not match them, we need to at least achieve 10 per cent of what they have,” said a government official.

Earlier Beijing had also registered a protest against the road project as it could complicate the border dispute between India and China.

India has been concerned with the development of areas across the border, and with China’s own expanding road network.
 
. . .
Indians army are scared the shit out of it by PLA, only the big mouth inidan members here keep bragging their mighty power to fight two front war. lol

I am glad you think so. It is good for us as long as you think like this, as we would rather face a stupid and over-confident opposition than a sensible and down-to-earth one. Keep up the good work.
 
.
Indians army are scared the shit out of it by PLA, only the big mouth inidan members here keep bragging their mighty power to fight two front war. lol
it doesn't prove such..
 
.
The mentality of India for a long time, has been to avoid building infrastructure near the border, in case China uses it to push deep into Indian territory.

But without good border infrastructure, how can you possibly hope to win a conflict on said border? China's border infrastructure allows us to achieve a much stronger force concentration at the conflict point, whereas India's own soldiers will have to manually trek over 50+ km on foot just to reach the border. By the time they arrive on the border, everything will have been finished already.
 
.
The mentality of India for a long time, has been to avoid building infrastructure near the border, in case China uses it to push deep into Indian territory.

But without good border infrastructure, how can you possibly hope to win a conflict on said border? China's border infrastructure allows us to achieve a much stronger force concentration at the conflict point, whereas India's own soldiers will have to manually trek over 50+ km on foot just to reach the border. By the time they arrive on the border, everything will have been finished already.

Actually,there is nothing on border,and as it is mountainous areas,it remains as natural obstacle for any such misadventure for any invasion force.No Armour or Support lines,invasion will fail pretty fast,because without these there is no hope to break containment placed by Indian Army.

But I'm for developments.The misconception of not developing is ultimately harming us more than gain.
 
.
Actually,there is nothing on border,and as it is mountainous areas,it remains as natural obstacle for any such misadventure for any invasion force.No Armour or Support lines,invasion will fail pretty fast,because without these there is no hope to break containment placed by Indian Army.

But I'm for developments.The misconception of not developing is ultimately harming us more than gain.

That seems like a repeated mistake.
 
.
Infrastructure is necessary and should be made regardless of anything
 
.
That seems like a repeated mistake.

Actually,It is military tactics which are being used in thousands of years..Using Geography on your favor is most one of the most important learning for military point of view.
 
.
Actually,It is military tactics which are being used in thousands of years..Using Geography on your favor is most one of the most important learning for military point of view.

Terrain is key of course. My question is that if the terrain is good enough as an obstacle (without any infrastructure), how come it didn't work before even against 1960's tech.

Terrain can give a good advantage if you use it well, but it's not enough by itself.
 
.
Terrain is key of course. My question is that if the terrain is good enough as an obstacle (without any infrastructure), how come it didn't work before even against 1960's tech.

Terrain can give a good advantage if you use it well, but it's not enough by itself.

You mean you can bring your Armour and Support Vehicles deep into Indian territory through the roads where even normal cars has terrible time to pass??

Now don't harp about 1962,as there no such armour and other support vehicles were involved.Thinly spread and poorly armed Indian personnel collapsed against mass attack.But that is no longer viable in this age.
 
. .
So there are no other means of transport, not even military transport aircraft?

Anyway, fine. If you guys don't want to build border infrastructure that's your own decision.

You've capability to carry 1 or 2 Tank Battalions and drop it in any semi prepared runway(lets assume China has captured one such) and support equipments and drop it deep inside India from where it can support your Infantry thrust??If you have 1 or 2 dozens of C-17 which can mount such operations without hindarence,I'm all ear.
 
.
Actually,there is nothing on border,and as it is mountainous areas,it remains as natural obstacle for any such misadventure for any invasion force.No Armour or Support lines,invasion will fail pretty fast,because without these there is no hope to break containment placed by Indian Army.

But I'm for developments.The misconception of not developing is ultimately harming us more than gain.




So there are no other means of transport, not even military transport aircraft?

Anyway, fine. If you guys don't want to build border infrastructure that's your own decision.



Don't worry we are well aware
http://indianexpress.com/article/in...unachal-pradesh-china-border-mechuka-2827901/
 
.
Back
Top Bottom