AgNoStiC MuSliM
ADVISORS
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2007
- Messages
- 25,259
- Reaction score
- 87
- Country
- Location
Indian artillery shells could have landed anywhere, or nowhere. It is a logical fallacy to argue that Pakistan should prove a negative. India is making claims about carrying out strikes on non-military targets so the onus is on her to provide coordinates for the locations where those strikes were carried out so that independent verification can take place.Where as Pakistan army is claiming, that Indian army hit civilian targets
The easiest way of debunking Indian army's claims, would be for Pakistan to actually show , where these artillery shells landed, the craters formed or the civilians injured. If that is not being provided, what are we to assume ?
That would be a much more conclusive proof, that some co-ordinates, which you will have cross reference with Indian drone footage(which you believe is doctored in the first place.)
Pakistan has to provide images/video of civilian casualties to support its claims.
If neither side provides evidence, is the conclusion then that the Indian Army bombed nothing more than a bunch of rocks and trees like the IAF in Balakot?