Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes! first win a war against Vietnam.
India will never go to war with China because they know they are no match for China. India dare not even think of going to war with China. Chinese will maul them even worse than they did in 1962.Lol just by deploying helicopters for the first time?? Then what you call regular ceasefire violation across Indo-pak border by your logic.
India will never go to war with China because they know they are no match for China. India dare not even think of going to war with China. Chinese will maul them even worse than they did in 1962.
India won't fight any war with even pakistan tooIndia will never go to war with China because they know they are no match for China. India dare not even think of going to war with China. Chinese will maul them even worse than they did in 1962.
Then one wonders why do you keep allegedly losing heads.We are militarily dominating on both LoC and LaC.
So according to you we can start war with pak anytime we want, whenever we feels like.India will never go to war with China because they know they are no match for China. India dare not even think of going to war with China. Chinese will maul them even worse than they did in 1962.
This is how China went to war with India in 1967 and got their azz whopped...
The Chinese had installed loudspeakers at Nathu La, and warned the Indians that they would suffer as they did in 1962, if they did not withdraw. However, Major General Sagat had carried out a detailed appreciation of the situation, and reached the conclusion that the Chinese were bluffing. They made threatening postures, such as advancing in large numbers, but on reaching the border, always stopped, turned about and withdrew. They also did not use any artillery, for covering fire, which they would have certainly done if they were serious about capturing any Indian positions
Ditto for Chinese quoting Chinese sources... or may be they will have smaller eyes...Indian quoting Indian sources using Indian chest-thumping wordings and preaching them to be facts.
Circle-jerking(and habitual lying) is an Indian specialty.
Looks like india wants to make a big deal with U.S. And trying to give the reason.
So what exactly did India achieve in an area not disputed, other than claimed killing of hundreds of Chinese soldiers with a photoshopped picture as evidence?This is how China went to war with India in 1967 and got their azz whopped...
The Chinese had installed loudspeakers at Nathu La, and warned the Indians that they would suffer as they did in 1962, if they did not withdraw. However, Major General Sagat had carried out a detailed appreciation of the situation, and reached the conclusion that the Chinese were bluffing. They made threatening postures, such as advancing in large numbers, but on reaching the border, always stopped, turned about and withdrew. They also did not use any artillery, for covering fire, which they would have certainly done if they were serious about capturing any Indian positions
Chinese wanted territory... India whopped them back to their original lines.. thats what strong defense is all about...So what exactly did India achieve in an area not disputed?
So let me get this straight Indians can kill hundreds of soldier in Sikkim and yet Aksai Chin is still in China? Does it make sense to you?Chinese wanted territory... India whopped them back to their original lines.. thats what strong defense is all about...