Indian army chief's claim regarding LoC ceasefire 'misleading': DG ISPR

[HAIDER]

Indian army chief's claim regarding LoC ceasefire 'misleading': DG ISPR​

Dawn.comPublished February 4, 2022 - Updated about 8 hours ago




32
Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) Director General Maj Gen Babar Iftikhar on Friday rejected Indian Army Chief Manoj Mukund Naravane's claim that the ceasefire arrangement on the Line of Control (LoC) was holding because India had negotiated from a "position of strength".
The 740-km LoC had seen unprovoked artillery shelling and firing from across the dividing line until February last year when India and Pakistan recommitted themselves to the 2003 ceasefire, bringing relief to the lives of the affected population.
On Thursday, Indian Army Chief Naravane said the ceasefire continued to hold because India had negotiated from a position of strength, according to a report by Indian news agency ANI.
Speaking about the ongoing military stand-off with China on India's northern border, Naravane said the "developments adequately underscore the requirement for ready and capable forces, with an optimal component of boots on ground backed by modern technology".
Reacting to the Indian army chief's comments, the DG ISPR termed the claim "clearly misleading".
The ceasefire was agreed "only due to Pakistan's concerns for the safety of people of Kashmir living on both sides of the LoC", he tweeted. "No side should misconstrue it as their strength or other's weakness."

https://twitter.com/x/status/1489448688216797184

The surprise truce announced in late February 2021 had brought an end to years of violence along the frontier that saw thousands of skirmishes rattle the Himalayan territory, where the two sides have used artillery, mortars, and small arms.
The deal effectively reinstated an earlier ceasefire signed by the two sides in 2003 that had been trampled by thousands of violations in recent years.
The ISPR said the original deal had largely held until 2016, when tensions exploded in occupied Kashmir, resulting in a surge in violence between the two sides.
As fighting along the LoC raged, ties between the rivals went into freefall with India repeatedly accusing Pakistan of sending infiltrators across the LoC, while Islamabad lambasted Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government for stoking Hindu nationalist sentiment against Muslims.
The two sides came close to another all-out war after an attack inside India-occupied Kashmir in 2019 led to tit-for-tat air strikes. But even after stepping back from the brink, fighting along the LoC escalated, reaching an apex in 2020 with thousands of clashes reported.
But the damage from coronavirus and slowing economies — along with a geopolitical tug of war — appeared to have convinced both the sides to halt for the time being.

 

[DocEinstein]

LEAVE IT TO THE DEGENERATE MOFO BHINDIANS to claim BS no matter what the reality is.
"Negotiated from a position of strength" ??
Their fucking bungholes were stuffed with chinese bungee sticks and they were running out of stories to claim "accidental deaths" to hide their losses on the LOC.
Shame on Bajwa to let this degenerate filth of a nation run away with a ceasefire without any strong concessions.
The story of Pakistani generals !

 

[Cash GK]

Idiots were force to stop firing after they were chicken nick by Chineses and Pakistanis from both side. Second thir post were stated hitting by tank shikens. Then usa withdrawal was one reason as well. Because usa told them to stop this shit as they wanted to withdraw peacefuly n they they did not wanted Pakistan to attack on Indian posts.So where that fucking strength comes their Main reason was when China pressed them from up side and Pakistan stared them pressing from Azad Kashmir side. These poor Indians realized now they are fuvked up.

 

[SIPRA]

Proper response from ISPR, to the statement of Indian "Band Master"

 

[crankthatskunk]

Why the IA chief restart the violations from position of strength!!
He would find out soon enough, how powerful IA army really is.

 

[SIPRA]

It was a quid pro quo. India wanted a part of it's forces to be shifted to Ladakh Border. Pakistan wanted to prevent unnecessay and painful casualties of Kashmiri civilians, on either side of LOC. It was they, who were bearing the burden of ceasefire violations.

 

[SQ8]

A better statement:
"Indian COAS claiming LOC ceasefire holding because they negotiated from position of strength,is clearly misleading. It was agreed because unlike India ,Pak’s has concerns 4 safety of ppl of Kashmir living on both sides of LOC. No side should misconstrue it as their strength or other’s weakness"

If you are going to send a statement then learn to give an underhanded slap along with it.

 

[Zarrar Alvi]

Indian army chief's claim regarding LoC ceasefire 'misleading': DG ISPR​

Dawn.comPublished February 4, 2022 - Updated about 8 hours ago




32
Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) Director General Maj Gen Babar Iftikhar on Friday rejected Indian Army Chief Manoj Mukund Naravane's claim that the ceasefire arrangement on the Line of Control (LoC) was holding because India had negotiated from a "position of strength".
The 740-km LoC had seen unprovoked artillery shelling and firing from across the dividing line until February last year when India and Pakistan recommitted themselves to the 2003 ceasefire, bringing relief to the lives of the affected population.
On Thursday, Indian Army Chief Naravane said the ceasefire continued to hold because India had negotiated from a position of strength, according to a report by Indian news agency ANI.
Speaking about the ongoing military stand-off with China on India's northern border, Naravane said the "developments adequately underscore the requirement for ready and capable forces, with an optimal component of boots on ground backed by modern technology".
Reacting to the Indian army chief's comments, the DG ISPR termed the claim "clearly misleading".
The ceasefire was agreed "only due to Pakistan's concerns for the safety of people of Kashmir living on both sides of the LoC", he tweeted. "No side should misconstrue it as their strength or other's weakness."

https://twitter.com/x/status/1489448688216797184

The surprise truce announced in late February 2021 had brought an end to years of violence along the frontier that saw thousands of skirmishes rattle the Himalayan territory, where the two sides have used artillery, mortars, and small arms.
The deal effectively reinstated an earlier ceasefire signed by the two sides in 2003 that had been trampled by thousands of violations in recent years.
The ISPR said the original deal had largely held until 2016, when tensions exploded in occupied Kashmir, resulting in a surge in violence between the two sides.
As fighting along the LoC raged, ties between the rivals went into freefall with India repeatedly accusing Pakistan of sending infiltrators across the LoC, while Islamabad lambasted Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government for stoking Hindu nationalist sentiment against Muslims.
The two sides came close to another all-out war after an attack inside India-occupied Kashmir in 2019 led to tit-for-tat air strikes. But even after stepping back from the brink, fighting along the LoC escalated, reaching an apex in 2020 with thousands of clashes reported.
But the damage from coronavirus and slowing economies — along with a geopolitical tug of war — appeared to have convinced both the sides to halt for the time being.

Bullshit It was the Nakyal Raid by the SSG on the Indian Officers visiting the forward OP when the CF was agreed upon by the Indians. Their DGMO even Complained about our Brigade Commander of that area to Pak DGMO.

A better statement:
"Indian COAS claiming LOC ceasefire holding because they negotiated from position of strength,is clearly misleading. It was agreed because unlike India ,Pak’s has concerns 4 safety of ppl of Kashmir living on both sides of LOC. No side should misconstrue it as their strength or other’s weakness"

If you are going to send a statement then learn to give an underhanded slap along with it.

Postion of Strength according to them is Loosing Two Captains and a lieutenant with 7 other soldiers in Nakyal Cross LOC raid by the SSG. The reason they planted a fake news about killing 7 SSG commandos

 

[Tornado23]

Bullshit It was the Nakyal Raid by the SSG on the Indian Officers visiting the forward OP when the CF was agreed upon by the Indians. Their DGMO even Complained about our Brigade Commander of that area to Pak DGMO.

Nakyal raid?

 

[Zarrar Alvi]

Nakyal raid?

Yes the Cross border Action by Pak SSG in Nakyal Sector LOC where they had Killed two Indian Captains and a Lieutenant visiting the Forward OP. Even collected some trophies. After getting thrased by the SSG they deliberately planted a fake BS about Killing some 8 Pak soldiers including 6 SSG.

Yes the Cross border Action by Pak SSG in Nakyal Sector LOC where they had Killed two Indian Captains and a Lieutenant visiting the Forward OP. Even collected some trophies. After getting thrased by the SSG they deliberately planted a fake BS about Killing some 8 Pak soldiers including 6 SSG.

6 or 7 SSGs as claimed by the Indians

 

[Tornado23]

Yes the Cross border Action by Pak SSG in Nakyal Sector LOC where they had Killed two Indian Captains and a Lieutenant visiting the Forward OP. Even collected some trophies. After getting thrased by the SSG they deliberately planted a fake BS about Killing some 8 Pak soldiers including 6 SSG.


6 or 7 SSGs as claimed by the Indians

2020 november cross border skirmish?

 

[POPEYE-Sailor]

Power of Alkhalid Tank

Some one give indian army chief cow dung.

 

[Zarrar Alvi]

Position of strength some couple of months ago in Poonch

2020 november cross border skirmish?

Yes . These were by the Pak Infantry Units. Cross LOC action was taken by SSG I even posted the Head of an Indian Officer on twitter back in 2020

Power of Alkhalid Tank

Some one give indian army chief cow dung.

Don not need them on the LOC. We still have Upper Hand on them whenever the LOC becomes Hot. Only the Snipers and LOC raiders are enough.

 

[Akatosh]

Yes the Cross border Action by Pak SSG in Nakyal Sector LOC where they had Killed two Indian Captains and a Lieutenant visiting the Forward OP. Even collected some trophies. After getting thrased by the SSG they deliberately planted a fake BS about Killing some 8 Pak soldiers including 6 SSG.


6 or 7 SSGs as claimed by the Indians

No Indian Army Captain or Lieutenant got killed in combat in entire 2021

https://indianarmy.nic.in/writereaddata/documents/army-day/ArmyDay-Ad%20Hindi.pdf

 

[Great Janjua]

Position of strength some couple of months ago in Poonch

Yes . These were by the Pak Infantry Units. Cross LOC action was taken by SSG I even posted the Head of an Indian Officer on twitter back in 2020


Don not need them on the LOC. We still have Upper Hand on them whenever the LOC becomes Hot. Only the Snipers and LOC raiders are enough.

Position of strength my arse konsa teer mara hain pakistan ne LOC par yah kashmir mein in pichle saalo mein.