here is a report from moscow defence brief..its pretty old and i m not sure whether it has been discussed before or not. So excuse me if i am repeating or providing stuffs which doesnt go in line with the topic.
Comparative Analysis of Russian Arms Deliveries to China and India
Konstantin MAKIENKO
China and India are the largest importers of Russian weapons. Together they consume about 60-70% of all Russian weaponry and military equipment exports. Therefore, it is worthwhile to compare the qualitative and quantitative parameters of military-technological cooperation of these two countries with Russia.
Air Force weaponry
Quantitatively, China is far ahead of India in the amount of Russian fighter jets it buys. As of the end of 2002, Russia's known commitment to China includes the delivery of about 19 Su-30MKK fighters and licenses for the production of about 180-185 Su-27SK aircraft. In the same period, 76 Su-27SK and Su-27UBK fighters, 57 Su-30MKKs, and an unknown number of kits for the licensed production of Su-27SKs in Shanghai have been delivered. Potential future contracts may include the sale of licenses for the production of up to 200 Su-27UBK/Su-30MKK fighters.
As of the end of 2002, India has received 18 Su-30K fighter jets1, 10 Su-30MKI and 10 MiG-29 fighters. The remaining contract commitments stipulate the delivery of 22 Su-30MKIs and the licensed production of 140 more Su-30MKI aircraft. A future contract will probably include the delivery of 10 more Su-30 MKIs.
Table 1 shows the quantitative parameters of Russian deliveries to China and India as of the end of 2002.
Information found in open sources seems to show that China's program of purchases will result in the acquisition of almost triple the number of heavyweight Su-27/30 fighter jets as compared to India's program. This comparison does not take into account the Chinese program for the development of a domestic F-10 lightweight fighter jet, the fulfillment of which is much more likely than the fulfillment of an analogous Indian project of Light Combat Aircraft (LCA).
However, a comparison of the qualitative characteristics of the Su-30MKI and Su-30MKK jets shows that the Indian Air Force is betting on the acquisition of much more technologically advanced machines. From one side, this military-technological policy indicates that India is trying to overcome its quantitative inferiority through higher quality - and the flight and technological training of Indian pilots allows this risk. From another side - the realization of this more risky policy will result in a constant lagging from the initial schedule of deliveries from Russia. Evidently, by the time the Indian Air Force has an appreciable grouping of Su-30MKIs at its disposal (i.e. by the end of 2003, when all 40 Su-30MKIs from the 1996 contract will be delivered), the Air Force of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) will begin a program of purchasing advanced Su-30MKs equipped with phased antenna grid radar (FAR) or begin modernizing its giant fleet of Su-27 fighters by installing modern weapons control systems. Thus, the PRC will be able to liquidate its qualitative inferiority to the Indian Air Force, while maintaining a significant quantitative lead.
Table 2 shows the basic differences between the Su-30MKI and the Su-30MKK aircraft as well as the key differences between the Chinese and Indian licensed production programs.
Special attention should be given to the fact that, in the framework of the contract for the licensed production of 140 Su-30MKI fighter jets, India bought a license for the production of an AL-31FP engine2. In the meantime, China, which plans to produce 200 Su-27SK fighter jets at its own factories, does not yet have this right. Thus, Russia maintains a significant influence over the Chinese production of fighter jets and the combat readiness of the PLA Air Force. This situation is becoming more evident considering the fact that the PRC has made the program of developing the F-10 fighter jet dependent on the availability of the AL-31FN engine.
Overall, a comparison of the Chinese and Indian programs shows that China is conducting a military-technological policy that emphasizes the relatively rapid quantitative growth of aviation technology with a more careful and slow qualitative progress. India, on the other hand, is wagering on buying a limited number of extremely modern Su-30MKI fighter jets, which only have one analogue in the world in their class - the American F/A-18E/F aircraft.
Table 1. Russian deliveries of combat aircraft to China and India as of the end of 2002. China
India
Delivered as of the end of 2002
36 Su-27SK
40 Su-27UBK
76 Su-30MKK
18 Su-30K
10 Su-30MKI
10 MiG-29
Russia’s contract commitments as of the end of 2002
19 Su-30MKK
200 SU-27SK (kits for licensed production)
22 Su-30MKI
140 Su-30MKI (kits for licensed production)
Probable contracts
Up to 200 Su-30MKK (licensed production)
AL-31F/FN engines (licensed production)
10 Su-30MKI
Total number of 4th-generation fighter jets after the carrying out of all planned purchases from Russia
350-500
200
Table 2. Basic differences between the licensed production programs of the PRC (Su-30MKK) and India (Su-30MKI) Su-30MKI
Su-30MKK
FAR radar
Yes
No
Front horizontal guiding fin
Yes
No
Controlled engine thrust vector
Yes
No
French and Israeli components
Yes
No
Licensed production of the AL-31F/FN engine
Yes
No
Navy weaponry
The same tendency can be observed in the sphere of navy technologies: India is pursuing a fairly risky technological policy, importing weaponry not yet in use by the Russian Navy, which contains components from other coun­tries. China is more conservative in its pur­chases - the technological demands grow less rapidly, but the purchases are made in large quantities.
The qualitative difference in the surface vessels that India has ordered - as in the case with the Su-30MKK fighter jet - is a weapons system that has not been used by the Russian fleet. The frigates from the 1135.6 class have never been built before, and they contain subsystems of foreign production. These include Indian navi­gation and communication systems, German wa­ter purifiers and Danish energy installations3. While, unlike in the case of Su-30MKI deliver­ies, there have been no delays in the export-ori­ented construction of 1135.6-class frigates, the risks of the emergence of defects and shortcom­ings in construction at the exploitation stage remain.
On the contrary, the PRC has obtained a system that is very familiar to the Russian Navy, since about 17 Sovremenny-class destroyers have actively been used by the Russian fleet for over 20 years. As in the case of the fighters, demands for the weapons system were raised with the acquisition of the second batch. Modernized destroyers will have a reinforced air defense and a more long-range anti-ship missile complex. It is possible that ships from the second batch will carry anti-ship missiles with effective range close to the limits of Missile Technology Control Regime - from 280 to 300 kilometers4.
Overall, the PRC received four submarines and two surface ships from Russia in the 1990s, and placed orders for two surface ships and eight submarines. India received four submarines and ordered three surface vessels, the transfer of which will take place in 2002-2003.
Air Defense and Ground Forces
There is not much sense in comparing China's and India's purchases in the sphere of air defense and ground forces, since unlike China, India did not make any major air defense system purchases in the 1990s. Right now, it is very likely that India's integrated air defense will be built on the basis of Israeli armaments systems5. With regard to ground forces weaponry, China
Table 3. Russian deliveries of Navy weaponry to the PRC and India in the 1990s China
India
Surface Vessels
2 Project 956E (Sovre­menny class) destroyers
2 956ME-class destroyers
3 1135.6-class frigates
Effective range of the mis­sile complex
120 km for the Project 956E
280 km
Stealth elements in the con­struction of the hull
No
Yes
Presence of analogues in the Russian Navy
Yes
No
Submarines
2 Project 877EKM (Kilo class) submarines
2 Project 636 (Kilo class) submarines
Contract for 8 submarines of the project 636
4 Project 877EKM (Kilo class) submarines
Modernization of 4 877EKM-class submarines
Target Detection Systems
No
9 Ka-31 EW helicopters
Sea Snake target-search system module
Naval Aviation and Air-borne Missiles
28 Su-30MKK aircraft,
Х-31A (AS-17)
No
Potential purchases
12-22 Su-30MKK aircraft
Admiral Gorshkov (Kiev class) aircraft carrier,
20-40 MiG-29K fighters
3 1135.6-class frigates (second batch)
Project 677 submarine
aims to fulfill its needs through national production. Indian orders for armaments for their ground forces are placed with several different states, but the largest of these contracts - an $800 million contract for the purchase of 310 T-90S main battle tanks - is with Russia.
Conclusion
The following conclusions can be made from a comparison of Chinese and Indian purchases of Russian weaponry:
The PRC is currently focusing on modernizing its Air Force, while the Indian Army, despite actively purchasing aviation equipment, is still giving priority to the purchase of naval armaments.
India is buying more technologically advanced armaments, taking greater technological risks, and thus jeopardizing the initial schedule for the delivery of aviation technology.
China is carrying out a less technologically ambitious, but much more realistic program of purchasing models that are outdated, but very familiar to the Soviet army and Russian industry.
The PRC generally buys larger batches of aviation armaments than India does.
Russia not only allows the transfer of more technologically advanced armaments to India, but also allows the sale of licenses for the production of critical subsystems needed for these armaments. The best example of this is the sale to India of licenses for the production of the AL-31F aircraft engine. Deliveries of such high-technology armaments and production technologies for critical subsystems to China are blocked by the Russian Defense Ministry.
Moscow Defense Brief