Indian actress Priyanka Chopra scammed singer Nick Jonas into marriage. US Mag...

[Maarkhoor]

same goes to Pakistan actresss ...Sir

Looking a typical Pakistan girl without makeup....



have a look your pakistan actress
status without makeup...

https://www.shughal.com/30-terrifying-pakistani-actresses-without-make-up/

Want to be continued but no time...... for this time waste topic

Still lot better than ugly Indian counterpart...

 

[Rajesh Kumar]

Still lot better than ugly Indian counterpart...

Naah.... you are not whitest people from west.... coming to same most ugly people if you say to indians. Sir

https://www.fashioncentral.pk/blog/2015/11/21/pakistani-actresses-with-and-without-makeup/

 

[Peshwa]

As per my standards she is not.....

Of course she isn’t up to your standards, since you can actually see her face.
We understand PDF Pakistanis prefer not to see the woman’s face at all and need them to be covered from head to toe.
Perhaps Darth Vader is more to your liking (standard)? Lolol

 

[fitpOsitive]

Priyanka Chopra scammed Nick Jonas into marriage


Social media went into a tizzy yesterday after an article in New York magazine's The Cut accused Priyanka Chopra of manipulating singer Nick Jonas into marriage. Netizens jumped to the defence of PeeCee. Facing a backlash, the references to PeeCee being a 'scam artiste' were initially deleted and later, the article was pulled off the site. The editor's note read: 'Upon further editorial review, we found this story did not meet our standards. We've removed it and apologise', reports Mid-Day.




The article titled, 'Is Priyanka Chopra and Nick Jonas's love for real?' termed PeeCee a 'scam artiste who tricked a naive and young Jonas into a lifelong commitment when all he really wanted was a fling'. It further read, 'Nicholas Jonas married into a fraudulent relationship against his will'. The article, written by Mariah Smith, also said 'Priyanka intends to break Nick's heart' and advised him to run away on the horse he arrived to his wedding on. 'Priyanka's indulgences and what she views as necessities speak volumes of her personality and what she'll do, or think she needs to do, for her career.'



It also shamed her for buying expensive things and said that their relationship doesn't make sense. Sonam K Ahuja, Swara Bhasker and Sona Mohapatra were among the first to slam the article. Sonam tweeted, "For a publication that shows women what they are made of @TheCut has a lot to answer for. The article was sexist, racist. Also, it's written by a woman which is sad. It reeks of envy and bitterness. @mRiah shame on you (sic)."

Bhai, Shadi kerli agli nain. Larki nain phansaya ya larky nain, ki tu shadi na?
I think its ok to scam like that
Haan, bachi tu log pataty thy, bacha patana is bibi nain introduce kerwa dia....its ok

@Rajesh Kumar

 

[Basel]

I partially agree with the article. What is misses is that BOTH have simply made a contract.... for a few years for the advantage of their careers. Thats it.

Hmm that may be right, as it's done in media.

 

[JohnWick]

same goes to Pakistan actresss ...Sir

Looking a typical Pakistan girl without makeup....



have a look your pakistan actress
status without makeup...

https://www.shughal.com/30-terrifying-pakistani-actresses-without-make-up/

Want to be continued but no time...... for this time waste topic

Not a too much difference
Hope we agree!