CaPtAiN_pLaNeT
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 10, 2010
- Messages
- 7,685
- Reaction score
- 0
like i said, the article left me a bit confused. If what you are saying is indeed true, then it is wrong and shouldn't be done. What do you, as a citizen plan to do?
Previously awamileague government told that bd will earn a lots of duty from this transit... before implementing it... after the signing of the deal india demanded the duty to be withdrawn... n bd government is doing just the same... they will take only a yearly fee just to cover up the damage which will be done by indian transport and for maintenance... there is no other thing included... I just wonder what bd will get out of it... n there is no limit placed on indian transport... if the Indians continue to flood the road with their transport and later said that there was no limit on the deal then what will be the case... drug dealing, smuggling, traffic congestion, lossing of bd's business in the NE india, annoying china and ULFA these are the only thing that will happen...no profit or benifit for bd what so ever... n I do not know why this article told bd will get duty from water transport... as few days back bd allowed to let 2 indian vessel go without paying any duty..... n finance minister said there will be no duty on water transport as well..