What's new

India Ups Firepower Along Borders with China with Modern Artillery Guns, Rocket Systems for Army

Casualties and losses
Indian claims:
88 killed
163 wounded[6][7]
Chinese claims:
101 killed
(65 Nathu La, 36 Cho La)[8]
Indian claims:
340 killed
450 wounded.[7]
Chinese claims:
32 killed (Nathu La), unknown (Cho La)[8]
sikkim-jpg.879539

002yz38rly1gv9hjudsvvj60wn0szjy002-jpg.879538

1634847856714-png.786741

Who occupies that land today?
 
Who occupies that land today?
Don't know, but India always claims that China newly occupied hundreds of miles of Indian controlled lands in recent years and changed the status quo, is that part of this claim?
 
Don't know, but India always claims that China newly occupied hundreds of miles of Indian controlled lands in recent years and changed the status quo, is that part of this claim?

yes, but thst is in kashmir. In Chola and Nathula, India took control of both passes after pushing Chinese back from the area.
 
yes, but thst is in kashmir. In Chola and Nathula, India took control of both passes after pushing Chinese back from the area.
You can claim Indians took control of south Tibet after beating China and pushing PLA out of the region in 1962 too, you always win.
 
Don't know, but India always claims that China newly occupied hundreds of miles of Indian controlled lands in recent years and changed the status quo, is that part of this claim?
@SIPRA
In pangong tso, china used to patrol up to finger 4 and india to finger 8. current buffer is f4 to f8. Since China used to patrol till F-4, they can no longer come there either
in depsang india is blocked from its patrol points 8km east of y-junction while china is blocked from its points 7km west of y-junction. India's on paper LAC claim is 18km east of y-junction in what is historically Pla controlled territory. Which is why Indian troops only asserted control up to 8km east of y-junction via patrols. If china had a upper hand it would have escalated in ladakh rather than withdrawing from pangong tso and continuing to be denied access to its patrol line near burtse in depsang.
20221003_114654.jpg

- In hot spring area, Chinese post has been relocated ~3km to rear.
- Which means, the Chinese have effectively agreed to ~6km of buffer on their side of the claim line!
-Sir, why pla have withdrawn 26 miles into its own side of galwan while nearest indian base is 2 miles away?
20221001_224257.jpg
 
Last edited:
@SIPRA
In pangong tso, china used to patrol up to finger 4 and india to finger 8. current buffer is f4 to f8. Since China used to patrol till F-4, they can no longer come there either
in depsang india is blocked from its patrol points 8km east of y-junction while china is blocked from its points 7km west of y-junction. India's on paper LAC claim is 18km east of y-junction in what is historically Pla controlled territory. Which is why Indian troops only asserted control up to 8km east of y-junction via patrols. If china had a upper hand it would have escalated in ladakh rather than withdrawing from pangong tso and continuing to be denied access to its patrol line near burtse in depsang.
So it's you are lying or your government is lying, they always claim China is "encroaching" Indian terriroty, who is lying?
 
Entire Aksai Chin is India’s territory which is illegally occupied by China
But they claim China has changed the status quo and newly occupies some Indian controlled lands, are they lying?
 
It's either you or your government is lying, you can not be both true cause you are contradicting each other.
 
@SIPRA
In pangong tso, china used to patrol up to finger 4 and india to finger 8. current buffer is f4 to f8. Since China used to patrol till F-4, they can no longer come there either
in depsang india is blocked from its patrol points 8km east of y-junction while china is blocked from its points 7km west of y-junction. India's on paper LAC claim is 18km east of y-junction in what is historically Pla controlled territory. Which is why Indian troops only asserted control up to 8km east of y-junction via patrols. If china had a upper hand it would have escalated in ladakh rather than withdrawing from pangong tso and continuing to be denied access to its patrol line near burtse in depsang.
View attachment 884288
- In hot spring area, Chinese post has been relocated ~3km to rear.
- Which means, the Chinese have effectively agreed to ~6km of buffer on their side of the claim line!
-Sir, why pla have withdrawn 26 miles into its own side of galwan while nearest indian base is 2 miles away?
View attachment 884289
@Black Tornado @VkdIndian @vishwambhar @Cheepek @Raj-Hindustani @Skull and Bones @LakeHawk180
 
Indian fools, get out of south tibet, or you will be annihilated.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom