What's new

India to train Vietnam air force in flying Sukhoi 30 Fighter planes

again brahmos. can't you talk something else because when i talk about brahmos indians mind it.
it's better if you equip your Su 30s with katrina kaif and ashwaria instead of using the word brahmos everywhere.

Its not the same Brahmos the Army, or the Navy or the Airforce Uses. Only the name and the range is same, the way how the missile functions is absolutely different. Its an entirely different missile. Its certainly an achievement that the Brahmos has been made capable to fire from under the sea to over the sky.
 
.
again brahmos. can't you talk something else because when i talk about brahmos indians mind it.
it's better if you equip your Su 30s with katrina kaif and ashwaria instead of using the word brahmos everywhere.

Nasar and nuke is always your answer,your nuclear threshold is so low ,atleast brahmos is conventional weapon which we boost,see the difference between you and us.
 
.
Nasar and nuke is always your answer,your nuclear threshold is so low ,atleast brahmos is conventional weapon which we boost,see the difference between you and us.
it's our answer practically but we don't take it's name regularly nor write about it in every post as indians are practicing.
go to google write brahmos and then go to news section and you will find out how brahmos is your Pet Phrase every where. you will find it's name on 60 ppercent of threads in this forum.
it isn't the case with nasr and pakistanis.
 
.
Hope the Vietnam Air Force would have a better safety record than the Indian Air Force.

I would advise India from train Vietnamese. Because Sukhoi will blame Indian trainers if Vietnam ever crash a plane.

it's our answer practically but we don't take it's name regularly nor write about it in every post as indians are practicing.
go to google write brahmos and then go to news section and you will find out how brahmos is your Pet Phrase every where. you will find it's name on 60 ppercent of threads in this forum.
it isn't the case with nasr and pakistanis.
India will put Brahmos on their flag soon. Also, why Indians never wonder that if Brahmos is so awesome, why Russia is ignoring this missile?
 
. .
India will put Brahmos on their flag soon. Also, why Indians never wonder that if Brahmos is so awesome, why Russia is ignoring this missile?

Maybe because it costs a ton to produce that missile, which the Russians cannot afford right now, or they require higher range missile I.e 1500+ km categories. Btw do you ever wonder why the Indians despite developing its own aircraft carrier, nuclear sub's, ICBMs, SLBMs, fighter jets, spy satellites, ABM systems, Air to air missiles, attack helicopters, 7500 ton destroyers, frigates etc etc, keep talking about the brahmos?
 
.
Maybe because it costs a ton to produce that missile, which the Russians cannot afford right now, or they require higher range missile I.e 1500+ km categories. Btw do you ever wonder why the Indians despite developing its own aircraft carrier, nuclear sub's, ICBMs, SLBMs, fighter jets, spy satellites, ABM systems, Air to air missiles, attack helicopters, 7500 ton destroyers, frigates etc etc, keep talking about the brahmos?

Yes, because of all the items you listed, it's the only one that is deemed successful. India failed miserably at all other items. But even it's a downgrade version of an existing Russian missile. That is why Russians won't use it. It's just a downgraded export missile to Russians.
 
. .
Yes, because of all the items you listed, it's the only one that is deemed successful. India failed miserably at all other items. But even it's a downgrade version of an existing Russian missile. That is why Russians won't use it. It's just a downgraded export missile to Russians.

So, the ICBMs, SLBMs, destroyers, sattelites, nuclear subs are not successful? This are some of the stuff which Pakistan can only dream of possessing, let alone developing it indigenously.
And yes, the downgraded brahmos missile costs much more than the original stuff, which is also available for export, nice logic.
 
. .
Yes, of all the items you listed, it's the only one that is deemed successful. India failed miserably at all other items. But even it's a downgrade version of an existing Russian missile. That is why Russians won't use it. It's just a downgraded export missile to Russians.

Russian r NT taking this missiles coz they have same Missiles with longer range nd due to NT member of MTCR at that tym it have restricted its range to 300 km...nd now on destroyer which was made recently by India is one of the best destroyer in the world it was better than ur friends Chinese destroyers , now on ABM system India is only the 5th nation to have this system so u don't think its a achievement, now India have its own navigation system so now we cn see everything in Pakistan nd China without any help of anyone so its not an achievement.? Now India have a missile which cn target any thing in range of 8000 km which was said by only ur Chinese Frnds is it NT an achievement.now we r able to develop a nuclear submarines so it is NT an achievement ...India now able to make ships of 40000 tons so what u think about it????
 
. . .
Thorium cannot be used as a weapon.
T
Thorium cannot be used as a weapon.
Thorium can't be used,but U233 can be used for making fission bombs. Uranium 233 was synthesised in thorium based fast breeder reactors.

And for your kind information uncle Sam has already detonated a U233 based fission bomb back in 50s itself.
 
Last edited:
.
Thorium can't be used,but U233 can be used for making fission bombs. Uranium 233 was synthesised in thorium based fast breeder reactors.

And for your kind information uncle Sam has already detonated a U233 based fission bomb back in 50s itself.

The percent of conversion to U233 from Thorium by Neutron irradiation is less than 3%.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom