What's new

India to stay in Afghanistan despite Pak objections

desiman

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 21, 2009
Messages
3,957
Reaction score
0
India to stay in Afghanistan despite Pak objections


During an hour-long bilateral meeting held between Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and US President Obama held at Blair house in Washington on Sunday, the Indian PM has made it clear that there was no question of withdrawing from Afghanistan despite Pakistan’s objection.

The uncompromising posture on Afghanistan is based on the efforts India has made in the war-torn country, where many Indians have also been killed. In 2008, India’s Military Attaché Brig R.D. Mehta and IFS officer Venkat Rao were killed in a suicide bombing. This year six Indians, including two Indian army Majors were killed when Taliban terrorists attacked the hotel where they were staying.


India, which did not send troops to Afghanistan to support the US-led global war on terror (GWOT), is involved in large scale humanitarian relief work. As part of the relief work, India has pledged US$1.3 billion in aid to the Afghan government, making it the biggest regional contributor. It is also constructing power stations, schools, hospitals, and training the Afghan national army apart from gifting buses to setup a public transport system and providing aircrafts to Afghanistan’s national carrier.


The meeting that took place on the side-lines of the ongoing nuclear security summit was significant to both countries, since diplomatic relations were strained due to several recent issues like India not getting access to 26/11 Mumbai attacks mastermind, David Headley, who is under US custody and the US' decision to supply more weapons (F-16s, frigates etc) to Pakistan despite India's concerns.


On its part, the US response was positive on both the important issues. OneIndia reports that Obama has assured India will get access to Headley. However, no time, date or place has yet been finalised. Another important outcome of the meeting was President Obama applauding the Indian role in Afghanistan and expressing desire that India continue the good work in Kabul, as well as promising to monitor the US arms aid to Pakistan reports Hindustan Times.


As a consequence of the tough stand taken by PM Manmohan Singh, PTI reports that Obama has prevailed upon the Pakistani PM Yousuf Raza Gilani, in a bilateral meeting, to reign in the terror groups like LeT operating against India from its soil.

8ak - Indian Defence News
 
.
awwwie, nothing new, same old things been repeated again & again, The thing is right now Americans give a damn to what Indians have to say regarding their concerns about Pakistan :)
 
.
India, which did not send troops to Afghanistan to support the US-led global war on terror (GWOT), is involved in large scale humanitarian relief work. As part of the relief work, India has pledged US$1.3 billion in aid to the Afghan government, making it the biggest regional contributor. It is also constructing power stations, schools, hospitals, and training the Afghan national army apart from gifting buses to setup a public transport system and providing aircrafts to Afghanistan’s national carrier.

How noble. Looks like India has a lot of money to spare. Maybe it should think about the slums and poverty present WITHIN its borders first. But then again, India does have an undeniable interest in Afghanistan (i.e. the neighbour next door).
 
.
How noble. Looks like India has a lot of money to spare. Maybe it should think about the slums and poverty present WITHIN its borders first. But then again, India does have an undeniable interest in Afghanistan (i.e. the neighbour next door).

Very true.. India spending in Afghanistan in my view is akin to defence spending..
 
.
People please stop this d1ck comparing debate before this thread goes to ruins...B/w another example of how independent our foreign policy is....

You are right. People here are writing without an logic.

Also I am amazed by India's tone over Iran issue. Now-a-days USA is talking good about Pakistan and OTOH India is taking different position. Meanwhile our foreign minister is doing somehing in China.

Something is cooking up. And everyone can smell. ;)
 
.
How noble. Looks like India has a lot of money to spare. Maybe it should think about the slums and poverty present WITHIN its borders first. But then again, India does have an undeniable interest in Afghanistan (i.e. the neighbour next door).

Sure we have an undeniable interest in Afghanistan. Pak wants to use it for its own benefit and if we can negate Pak's influence in Afghanistan, it would be easy to improve relations between India and Afghanistan.
Who know if in future Afghanistan could offer its airbases and territory to field our equipment and army. That would be interesting.
 
.
As neighbors our both countries (india and pak) should come on to a discussion table regarding afghanistan. We have seen over the years the fickle mindedness of america. since we are the people more concerned a consensus should be developed atleast on afg (since kashmir is a sore point). That would be a real development.:yahoo:
 
.
indians are really desperate, but they don't understand that America wants to exit Afghanistan safely and they cannot do that without Pakistan's help, and if they want Pakistan's help then they also have to understand Pakistan's concerns and regional interest and that is to get india out of Afghanistan!

No matter how hard manmohan and co try to cling on to the rope, it will eventually break.:wave:
 
.
A strawman by the Indian media.

Pakistan never said it wanted India to stop investing in Afghanistan - both the Pakistani civilian and military leadership have said as much. It was the military footprint and covert activities that were argued against.

Self serving rhetoric to paint India in a better light is all it is, much like the reports on 'Obama lectured Pakistan at India's behest'.
 
.
A strawman by the Indian media.

Pakistan never said it wanted India to stop investing in Afghanistan - both the Pakistani civilian and military leadership have said as much. It was the military footprint and covert activities that were argued against.

Self serving rhetoric to paint India in a better light is all it is, much like the reports on 'Obama lectured Pakistan at India's behest'.

this is exactly wat i had in my mind before entering this thread.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom