What's new

India to get access to almost 99% of US defence technologies, says Obama administration official

Quibbler

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 1, 2013
Messages
779
Reaction score
-19
Country
India
Location
India
WASHINGTON: India will be the only country outside US' formal treaty allies that will gain access to almost 99 per cent of latest America's defence technologies after being recognised as a 'Major Defence Partner', a senior Obama administration official has said.

"India (now) enjoys access to (defence) technologies that is on par with our treaty allies. That is a very unique status. India is the only other country that enjoys that status outside our formal treaty allies," the official told PTI explaining what 'Major Defence Partner' status means for India.

Early this month, after a meeting between US President Barack Obama and Prime MinisterNarendra Modi at the White House, the US, in a joint statement, recognised India as a 'Major Defence Partner

"We were looking for something unique. This language you would not find in any arms transfer legislation or any of our existing policies. This is new guidance and new language that is intended to reflect the unique things that we have done with India under our defence partnership," the senior administration official said.

"This is intended to solidify the India-specific forward leaning policies for approval that the (US) President and (Defense) Secretary (Ashton) Carter...and our export control system have implemented in the last eight years," the official said.

Under this recognition India would receive license-free access to a wide range of dual-use technologies in conjunction with steps that New Delhi has committed to take to advance its export control objectives.

Acknowledging that the impression in New Delhi is that India is not getting access to the kind of technology it needs from the US, the official said it is a constant source of discussion.

"(In reality), less than one per cent of all exports (requests) are denied (to India). They are not denied because of India. They are denied because of global US licensing policies. We do not share certain technologies with anybody in the world," the official asserted.

The perception in India that the denial of such technologies is reflective of India-US relationship is far from the truth, the official said.

According to the official, India being recognised as a "major defence partner puts it on par with our treaty allies".

Inside the American bureaucratic system, such a recognition removes a number of major export control hurdles for India.

The category of 'Major Defence Partner' was created specifically for India, observed Ashley Tellis, of Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a top American think-tank.

"It was meant to recognise that although India will not be an alliance partner of the United States, the administration seeks to treat it as such for purposes of giving it access to advanced technologies of the kind that are reserved for close US allies," Tellis told PTI.

"The US expects that bilateral defence ties will only grow in the years ahead, that India and the United States will continue to work together especially regarding maritime security, that India will eventually be admitted to global nonproliferation regimes, and that it will sign the foundational agreements," he said in response to a question.

"As these developments materialise, India's access to US technology will also increase, and the "major defence partner" moniker is intended to signal to both the outside world and to the US bureaucracy that oversees licensing that India is viewed as a unique collaborator and will be treated as such where access to advanced technologies are concerned," Tellis said.

Calling India a "Major Defence Partner" is "more a term of art than a technical designation", noted Richard M Rossow, Wadhwani Chair in US India Policy Studies at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, another top American think-tank.

"It certainly captures what is emerging as a unique relationship, exhibited by programs such as the Defence Technology and Trade Initiative (DTTI) and the establishment of a dedicated 'India Rapid Reaction Cell' inside the Pentagon. Neither exists for a country other than India," he said.

"But the term 'Major Defence Partner' does not automatically trigger a specific process or program in the US system. Our two countries are feeling their way around the contours of our defence relationship," Rossow told PTI.

"India desires advanced US technology today, while the US would like more clarity on the specific operations India may be willing to undertake in the future to contribute to regional security. It is a process that has seen great progress, which we hope will carry over into the next US administration," Rossow said in response to a question.

Over the last one decade the defence trade between India and the US has increased from being almost non-existent to more than USD 14 billion. This is expected to increase manifold as India embarks on a major defense modernisation drive
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...inistration-official/articleshow/52923468.cms
 
so then how about 90 single seat & 12 twin seat F16V version with latest version of GaN based radars and combined EW/ECM/internal jammers suites of HARM, AIM9X,AIM120D ,PGMs, SOMs,SDBs & ALCM's and hellfire and other sensor fused weapons for IAF

Latest version of wheeled & tracked light tanks and IFVs long range fire detection radars and anty radar countermaesures and range of gatling and heavy callibur machine guns and sniper rifels and latest man portable ATGMs that can breach any known armour in chinese innoventorry for the IA

and EMALS , AAG , Neuclear propulssion and light and heavy long range torpedoes and anty ship missiles and anty sub warfare radars and long range and medium rabnge search and rescue hellicopters and float planes for IN
 
so then how about 90 single seat & 12 twin seat F16V version with latest version of GaN based radars and combined EW/ECM/internal jammers suites of HARM, AIM9X,AIM120D ,PGMs, SOMs,SDBs & ALCM's and hellfire and other sensor fused weapons for IAF

Latest version of wheeled & tracked light tanks and IFVs long range fire detection radars and anty radar countermaesures and range of gatling and heavy callibur machine guns and sniper rifels and latest man portable ATGMs that can breach any known armour in chinese innoventorry for the IA

and EMALS , AAG , Neuclear propulssion and light and heavy long range torpedoes and anty ship missiles and anty sub warfare radars and long range and medium rabnge search and rescue hellicopters and float planes for IN

Oh pls. We do not need F16. Let's stop with the obsession of F16. We might need a good naval fighter, and Rafale M is good for that too.
We need their help in radars, Sensors, Emals propulsion, Jet Engine tech, and this everything falls under 1%.
 
What we lacks is electronic attack platforms. Only uS can provide a top end electronic attack platform. Growler can change the balence in this region.
 
Oh pls. We do not need F16. Let's stop with the obsession of F16. We might need a good naval fighter, and Rafale M is good for that too.
We need their help in radars, Sensors, Emals propulsion, Jet Engine tech, and this everything falls under 1%.
F16V are for IAF not IN but even there naval ASH is around 150-180 million each, including weapons,training, service and spares while a single Rafale M is close to 260-280 million each, including weapons,training, service & spares that is almost 100 million cheaper while US weapons are superior to french anyday

as for radar and jet engine tech and latest EMALS tech USA will only "sell" it forget any TOT
 
Thank God pakistan is no more ally of US ...... i am happy that india is new ally of US in the region .....

Indians usualy get very exited at any statement that feeds their habit.
We saw the same reaction when 126 Rafales were selected many moons ago.
The reality is if any of this was practical, India would have selected the F-16 by now.
 
Indians usualy get very exited at any statement that feeds their habit.
We saw the same reaction when 126 Rafales were selected many moons ago.
The reality is if any of this was practical, India would have selected the F-16 by now.
no jammer bhiya its just few most of the indians know where is the real problem and its with owr beurocracy than anything else which eats so much time but dont worry both (126 -36+90rafales and either ASH or F16V ) is coming to india as we unlike do all the paprework and minute details very thoughrowlly deu to owr past bad expereances
 
"The US expects that bilateral defence ties will only grow in the years ahead, that India and the United States will continue to work together especially regarding maritime security, that India will eventually be admitted to global nonproliferation regimes, and that it will sign the foundational agreements," he said in response to a question.
This is where things gets tricky.
India wants US help in the development of some key technologies which the US is unwilling to do.
 
Indians usualy get very exited at any statement that feeds their habit.
We saw the same reaction when 126 Rafales were selected many moons ago.
The reality is if any of this was practical, India would have selected the F-16 by now.



so are the Pakistani.. su 35.. excitement still running..
 
F16V are for IAF not IN but even there naval ASH is around 150-180 million each, including weapons,training, service and spares while a single Rafale M is close to 260-280 million each, including weapons,training, service & spares that is almost 100 million cheaper while US weapons are superior to french anyday

as for radar and jet engine tech and latest EMALS tech USA will only "sell" it forget any TOT
Guruji India would prefer to buy the key strategic weapons from a reliable partner who did not puts the end user restrictions on us whenever we wants to use them in case of an emergency.
Basically the US wants us to buy their weapons and use them against the country of their choise(China).
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom