amitkriit
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2014
- Messages
- 1,245
- Reaction score
- -29
- Country
- Location
No, Air-Power (especially of the Brute kind) is again highly unsuited for these ops.
It will need intelligent and persistent operations by numerous small groups of "foot-sloggers".
TINA......There Is No Alternative to this method as the primary means of action.
Just as there is ABSOLUTELY NO ESCAPE for providing Governance in the affected areas; which is the root cause for the deep disaffection prevailing.
In the meanwhile; please to take time to ruminate on all the other points that I have made earlier. There is barely any scope for any "Cowboy Actions". Resorting to them will be disastrous.
Attack Helos cannot look through thick vegetation or forest cover. Conversely anybody well armed with HMGs or equivalent or (god forbid) MANPADS and easily camouflaged in the vegetation/topography will be able to swiftly alter the "balance of power".
Think about it!
When the UAVs were pressed into service, few experts were not in favour of it, the logic being "thick vegetation" but the plan paid off. In case of anti-naxal ops attack helicopters must be deployed in troops support role (close support, reinforcement and evacuation). Air Power is more effective in cases when the enemy assets/formations are concentrated in a particular area and not in cases of asymmetric warfare because the Air Power is more like the blunt side of the hammer (The US learned it the hard way in Iraq).
If the battle reaches a stage when we might have to face HMGs and MANPADs we must be very clear in our minds that the problem must no longer be treated as a "law and order" problem and in that case we better flatten the whole area without caring about who died on ground.