India successfully tests Nirbhay cruise missile

[Munir]

Kindly stop using irrelevant topic otherwise i got lot more to talk on

Do not act like a mod.

 

[Green Angel]

Just wait for 3 days Notice Period for the Test of BABUR - 3 Missile with the range of 1500kms.

 

[The Deterrent]

@sandy_3126
@The Deterrent

i think the warheads will be swappable
+
for shorter range you just need to put in a heavier payload / warhead no need to decrease the fuel

if you look at all other indian missiles

the range is always quoted at the lower end and

the range v/s payload /warhead graph is always there

which means such a provision would already been made in Nirbhay

Nope. Nirbhay is a cruise missile, not a ballistic one. It simply doesn't works like that.
And range vs. payload graphs work for artillery shells, not for complex weapon systems with a load of other factors than payload affecting the ultimate range.

 

[kaku1]

Nope. Nirbhay is a cruise missile, not a ballistic one. It simply doesn't works like that.
And range vs. payload graphs work for artillery shells, not for complex weapon systems with a load of other factors than payload affecting the ultimate range.

The main game changer is not land launched Nirbhay, but it would be VLS launced Nirbhay, that able to deploy on Project 15, 15A, 17, 17A.

 

[ares]

I donot want to put you so down, but Nirbhay is a test, only Nirbhay was the one which u tested with is now dust. A test Nirbhay has no value for Pakistan.

Rest Brahmos technology which u got from Russian donations, is still needs to be updated regularly, may be it works...and I lastly Prahar is still needs to be validated.

As far as am concerned BABUR 1 & 2, RAAD and NASR missiles, they are all already MASS produced, validated, under huge numbers and complete. So, need I say more.

What nonsense are you writing?

Russian donation, Chinese donation or North Korean missile - Nuclear swap deal...The fact is India has Bhramos and loads them..There are more than 2000 Bhramos available to Indian armed forces.

Prahaar is further along in deployment than NASR..as AAD of which Prahaar is SSM version has itself been tested more than half a dozen times in addition to Prahaar's tests..How many times has Nasr been tested?.. 3 ?
Already an export variant has been unveiled last year in Seoul. Not the least, that it outmatches Nasr in all aspects.

 

[Kloitra]

@sandy_3126 What exactly is wrong with the posting. As far as I know every piece of my post is reality. Let us give moderating team the look at it...

Your first missile test failed in minutes due to laser gyro malfunction and DRDO claimed success. You can read it on the web/LiveFist etc

You are the largest nation at the moment in population...

You are busy with prop trainer (IAF skipped it by ordering foreign), you're LCA is longest program even in mankind when we talk about basic light fighterjet. You do add every part from the rest of the world. US engine, Israeli radar. European avionics.

You want to be part of Superpower. Everything is linked to be part of or accepted as Superpower.. Even the Times had the title the next superpower India... Look at average Bollywood movie and it is all about India being so good... Read posts on the web and it is all about indiagenous sorry I meant indigenous.

Modi is part of Hindu nationalism and is part of the massacre of muslims in Gujarat. Don;t tell me that he was banned by the usa for decades because he served the best chai. He was indeed a chai seller in India...

Indeed you have MKI crash just day ago.

So my Indian think tank friend. NEgative rating is not an issue but there is nothing wrong in it. Surely lightly direct but still nothing wrong and less offensive then most posters from your nation write.

@WebMaster

I think it is plain stupid if you give me rating on nothing and then start a personal discussion with all the mods. Let me be simple. Your side is abusing this forum in almost every section I have read. Your sides keep thanking eachother for what? Smileys? I do not get into discussions about ethics if there is no sincerity and certainly not based on something real. My post is correct.

Let's argue what's wrong with your post - apart from it being offtopic:

Haha. Let me remind you your last test of this missile... A few seconds flight and they call it successful till it crashed in a few minutes.

Only part remotely on topic.

Here we are looking at a nation that is the largest in the world.

Offtopic and false: 2nd biggest.

Busy with 3d generation aircraft since the 90's.

Off topic and false: 4rth gen.

Not even able to produce a prop plane

Offtopic

It has all the input it can get from Israel, USA and Europe

False: no input from any country regarding subsonic cruise missile or the real problem - turbofan.

And now you wannebee superpowaah.

Offtopic

I smell Modi. A seller of chai now acting like God after massacre of Muslims in Gujarat

Offtopic, accusations without proof and personal ranting coming after giving someone negative rating for the same.

All of this to explain how Nirbhay is a copy of tomahawk:

. Let us be fair. Nothing the Indians planned worled. Now USA wants India to be counter of China. Suddenly you have a working Tomahawk copy? That is not trolling my friend. That is an opinion. And if you ask me that is more realistic knowing Indian background.

Source: India successfully tests Nirbhay cruise missile | Page 18

Your post barely touched the topic, and didn't explain how USA helped India or how Nirbhay resembles Tomahawk.

 

[a.kumar]

Babur 1 barely touched 500 km that too being a subsonic Cruise missiles , while BrahMos being supersonic missile officially can hit targets till 290km , Many times DRDO has mentioned it to be 500 km range one . Babur-2 hardly covers 700 km just 200km more , not a big improvement , While Nirbhay hit target at 1050km in its second test shows it can hit target over 1300-1500 with little changes to its internals .

 

[Kloitra]

Babur 1 barely touched 500 km that too being a subsonic Cruise missiles , while BrahMos being supersonic missile officially can hit targets till 290km , Many times DRDO has mentioned it to be 500 km range one . Babur-2 hardly covers 700 km just 200km more , not a big improvement , While Nirbhay hit target at 1050km in its second test shows it can hit target over 1300-1500 with little changes to its internals .

Not little change. If current range is the limit, it would require major changes to improve it.

 

[Asian.Century]

Bro, Prahaar already is in mass production.

And one thing, Prahaar will be inducted in Artillery regiment not in SFC, like BrahMos.

Prahaar is a tactical BALLISTIC missile, go check DRDO, a Mobile battlefield missile support system, NOT a CRUISE Missile. It is a MBRL. Prahaar is still highly an unstable system, with very in accurate guidance system, and still hits target above 10 meters, which is sadly not good enough. Pragati is export variant of Prahaar Missile, which nobody is interested to buy ever from India. Prahaar as u rightly said, is still not deployed yet in mass regiments of Indian Artillery Army.


While am listing you Babur 1, Babur 2, NASR land based Cruise Missiles and RAAD, is Pakistan air launched Cruise Missile far ahead to anything Indians has.

All four types of Pakistani Cruise missiles, are in mass production, highly accurate, advanced electronic, and in full deployment, India has no match against it, except the Russia-indo Brahmos.

And as far as Ballistic Missile capability, Pakistan has a big, mighty answer for Ballisitc Missiles, where India cannot even play a catch up game.

 

[Omega007]

Babur 1 barely touched 500 km that too being a subsonic Cruise missiles , while BrahMos being supersonic missile officially can hit targets till 290km , Many times DRDO has mentioned it to be 500 km range one . Babur-2 hardly covers 700 km just 200km more , not a big improvement , While Nirbhay hit target at 1050km in its second test shows it can hit target over 1300-1500 with little changes to its internals .

'Little changes' would not do it bro.In order to increase the range to say 1500 km,either the present turbofan has to be discarded completely in favor of a newer one with better SFC or the missile body has to be elongated to cater for extra fuel.

 

[Kloitra]

Prahaar is a tactical BALLISTIC missile, go check DRDO, a Mobile battlefield missile support system, NOT a CRUISE Missile. It is a MBRL. Prahaar is still highly an unstable system, with very in accurate guidance system, and still hits target above 10 meters, which is sadly not good enough. Pragati is export variant of Prahaar Missile, which nobody is interested to buy ever from India. Prahaar as u rightly said, is still not deployed yet in mass regiments of Indian Artillery Army.


While am listing you Babur 1, Babur 2, NASR land based Cruise Missiles and RAAD, is Pakistan air launched Cruise Missile far ahead to anything Indians has.

All four types of Pakistani Cruise missiles, are in mass production, highly accurate, advanced electronic, and in full deployment, India has no match against it, except the Russia-indo Brahmos.

And as far as Ballistic Missile capability, Pakistan has a big, mighty answer for Ballisitc Missiles, where India cannot even play a catch up game.

What exactly Pakistan got which is so big and mighty that India can't catchup? Can you list the types and range available with both countries? Can you tell why are Indian BM not sufficient for Pakistan, and why Pakistan had to develop cruise?
How Prahar is unstable system? How NASR is a cruise missile? How accurate are Pakistani cruise missiles (CEP)?

 

[SrNair]

Missile was test fired in morning.But thread is still flying.

 

[Asian.Century]

What exactly Pakistan got which is so big and mighty that India can't catchup? Can you list the types and range available with both countries? Can you tell why are Indian BM not sufficient for Pakistan, and why Pakistan had to develop cruise?
How Prahar is unstable system? How NASR is a cruise missile? How accurate are Pakistani cruise missiles (CEP)?

Here the proof Pakistani Missile capability far ahead to India:

why are you bringing all the crappy missile Babur , Nasr or any ballistic missile, which you never tested?.
All the missile either bought from North Korea or China
you people will never understand the excitement and anticipation of missile testing and will never go such feeling.
please take your crappy ****_hurt opinion some where else . no one cares about your opinion.

Never tested ???? North Korea and China Imported?

 

[Omega007]

Prahaar is a tactical BALLISTIC missile, go check DRDO, a Mobile battlefield missile support system, NOT a CRUISE Missile. It is a MBRL. Prahaar is still highly an unstable system, with very in accurate guidance system, and still hits target above 10 meters, which is sadly not good enough. Pragati is export variant of Prahaar Missile, which nobody is interested to buy ever from India. Prahaar as u rightly said, is still not deployed yet in mass regiments of Indian Artillery Army.


While am listing you Babur 1, Babur 2, NASR land based Cruise Missiles and RAAD, is Pakistan air launched Cruise Missile far ahead to anything Indians has.

All four types of Pakistani Cruise missiles, are in mass production, highly accurate, advanced electronic, and in full deployment, India has no match against it, except the Russia-indo Brahmos.

And as far as Ballistic Missile capability, Pakistan has a big, mighty answer for Ballisitc Missiles, where India cannot even play a catch up game.

'Less than' 10 meter brother,we have our own way with words.Like previously the Nirbhay's range was reported to be more than 700 kilometers.And present CEP of Prahaar NLOS BSM is with RLG INS only,wait till our IRNSS comes online,then you get the glimpse of the true potential of Indian missiles.

And besides,your Nasr is in no way a cruise missile,it's a same system like Prahaar only with one third the range and payload!!

And coming to your Babur,congrats with that.You have it deployed only because you guys started like 15 years earlier than India and still it is fitted with an engine that is generations behind the one on board the Nirbhay prototype!!Says a lot about the military industrial complexes and R&D base of the respective countries.

And for Ballistic missiles,what you say was true like 8 years ago son,the reality has totally changed and India has already snatched the pace.The gap has widened beyond any catching up, you got that correct...............only it is in our favor.

 

[Kinetic]

Prahaar is a tactical BALLISTIC missile, go check DRDO, a Mobile battlefield missile support system, NOT a CRUISE Missile. It is a MBRL. Prahaar is still highly an unstable system, with very in accurate guidance system, and still hits target above 10 meters, which is sadly not good enough. Pragati is export variant of Prahaar Missile, which nobody is interested to buy ever from India. Prahaar as u rightly said, is still not deployed yet in mass regiments of Indian Artillery Army.


While am listing you Babur 1, Babur 2, NASR land based Cruise Missiles and RAAD, is Pakistan air launched Cruise Missile far ahead to anything Indians has.

All four types of Pakistani Cruise missiles, are in mass production, highly accurate, advanced electronic, and in full deployment, India has no match against it, except the Russia-indo Brahmos.

And as far as Ballistic Missile capability, Pakistan has a big, mighty answer for Ballisitc Missiles, where India cannot even play a catch up game.

WHAT KIND OF WEED ARE U SMOKING?

You are comparing K-4, K-15, Agni-5, Agni-4 and Agni-3 with pakistani missiles!! go compare with trident-2 or bulava.

Guys, ignore this fun, and move ahead.